when the status quo frustrates.

Why I support black-focused schools

Thursday, January 31st, 2008

A few people have asked for my thoughts on the TDSB’s decision in favour of black-focused schools. Sonjaa and Troubleinchina both wrote good posts on the subject, and I recommend reading those too.

I’ll preface this by saying that this is a divisive issue in Toronto, particularly within the black community and the activist community. It’s also a rare example of my opinion reversing on a controversial issue within a very short period of time. In August 2007, I thought that black-focused schools were a terrible idea. Five months later, I support the plan, albeit critically. This about-face happened because of a) my experiences at OISE, b) my experiences in an actual Toronto high school, and c) heated debates with people that I respect.
(more…)

Everything’s more delicious when it’s seasoned with Privilege

Saturday, January 12th, 2008

My salt shaker has corroded shut, and should I break it tomorrow in a last attempt to open it with some help from a vise, I may need a new salt and pepper shaker set. Maybe this time I’d like a cute one, so off to ebay I go.

And, oh, my god.

First off, there was apparently a time, post-WWII, when the whole of occupied Japan was forced to make ceramic novelty condiment sets to satiate America’s apparent post-war frenzy for kitchy salt and pepper sets. This must be a big deal for current salt and pepper set collectors, with JAPAN being in many auction titles and occasionally, more helpfully, OCCUPIED JAPAN.

Secondly, WTF?

917f_2

No, really. What. The. Fuck.
20e9_1

“Black Mammy” (or “Black Americana”) is still a shockingly popular motif – there are several salt shakers and I also ran into it while looking for vegetable bins. Which, OK, maybe they have some collector’s value even if you’d have to be insane to actually put them on your table, but that doesn’t explain the times people describe them as “cute.”

As for the salty ta-tas… Well, I wish I could say I was surprised, but after Melissa’s Boobie Product Parade, I’m not.

The 9 Most Racist Disney Characters

Saturday, January 5th, 2008

Racist Disney
I really don’t remember this scene from Fantasia.

You may have already seen this, but if you haven’t, do take a moment and check out Cracked.com’s rundown of Disney’s most shameful moments. I mean, not that it’s surprising that a massive corporation run by a right-wing snitch has some skanky race issues, but wow.

Most parents show their kids these cartoons. Mine did, and no, I didn’t get the cultural and historical context that makes a character like Uncle Remus so very, very disturbing. This is the sort of thing that makes explaining systemic racism to white people so terribly frustrating. (On a related note, don’t read the comments unless you have a stronger stomach than I do.)

I’m surprised that this didn’t get a mention. Though I guess nameless slaves don’t really count as “characters.”

Third Reich to Fortune 500 is also funny/disturbing.

Hat tip: rantipole6

Racism is like the Ravenous Bugblatter Beast of Traal: if you can’t see it, it can’t see you. Right?

Thursday, November 15th, 2007

Breaking news: white boy does something racially insensitive and is knocked right on his ass.

Gabriel Keith, an assistant editor at the City College Times at Minneapolis Community & Technical College, used a drawstring from a hooded sweatshirt to make a noose, from which he hung a message about making deadlines in late October.

The tactic did not go over well in a newsroom that included several black students. Keith took the noose down five minutes later, but the ensuing hubbub led to his firing from the paper and a dispute between the editor-in-chief and the adviser.

Long story short: everyone involved knows that this college newspaper editor was not trying to make a racist statement; however, his offensive and poorly executed attempt to be funny and the apparently poor handling of the event afterwards meant that at the very least, he needed to be replaced by someone with a clue. Anyone who has ever spent five minutes in a campus newspaper office can probably imagine how this whole thing went down. And really, how can you not have sympathy for the guy? Expecting a journalism upperclassman to be aware of all the major symbols in modern American history is like expecting him to remember the names of all 50 freaking states. That’s like, a lot, and he’ll never even use half of it, so whats the big deal?

I was in the middle of learning to fix a heat stage when my friend came in to talk about this terribly critical event; mostly he wanted to complain that the thought police were on their way when a man can’t use a noose to convince his subordinates to do their work on time. I was just surprised that every guy in the room needed to have why a noose could be interpreted as a racist symbol explained to them. I made several compelling arguments about why this newspaper editor was in the wrong, including: “well, duh” (this one didn’t work as well as I think it should have) and “a newspaper editor, off all fucking people, should know better than to use such a heavily laden symbol for something so stupid, especially since the noose has no special relationship to making people work more effectively so he could have just as easily picked something else” which I think they found a little harder to argue with. I mean, really, pretend you’re a person who has no negative noose-related associations, then pretend you’ve just seen one hanging over your boss’ desk. My first thought? WTF? My second? Maybe I need a new boss, if this one is threatening to kill me in an elaborate and antiquated manner for missing a deadline. Perhaps I’d like to work with someone with better management skills. See? Even if you remove the racist imagery all together, Gabriel Keith is still a dumbass.

Then I actually read the article. Now, the version I linked to is similar to the version I read this morning, but it replaces a few paragraphs with more recent information. In the version I read, two assistant editors (or they may have been section editors, I forget which) said that they’d been there when Keith and his friend had made the noose, and they told them it was a bad idea to hang it up. In fact, other suggestions were made and dismissed in favor of the noose.

The two assistant editors were black women, by the way.

So now those of us who have spent some time in the campus journalism school really know how this all went down, don’t we? There’s always that One Guy. They’re everywhere, and most of them never get beaten with the clue-by-four they so richly deserve, so you can imagine how surprised these guys are when someone finally calls them on their bullshit. How much do you want to bet that the two guys making the noose were too busy giggling over how funny it was to heed their prudish colleagues warnings? And now they’re paying for it, cause no one can just take a joke. It’s a harsh world, I know, and let’s pause and feel sorry for poor Gabe. OK, that should be enough of that. I’m sure he’ll do OK once all the furor dies down; you don’t reach 2623 that clueless without some kind of safety net.

So I went back to my friend and said, hey, I read the article and while it is overkill that this campus incident has made national news, the editor in question was pretty fucking stupid, doubly so because he’d been warned by his two coworkers that hanging the noose was a terrible idea. Now, I know what I’ve been thinking when I’ve told guys “I don’t think this is a good idea.” And I have been told by others, “I don’t think this is a good idea.” We all know what “I don’t think this is a good idea” means; it means: dude, fucking stop it, this is an awful idea. No, seriously, fucking stop it right now because you’re going to get in trouble. The person saying this is nearly always right.

My friend, however, considered this a terribly cryptic, almost useless warning. What, he said, are we supposed to read women’s minds?

White male privilege in a nutshell, ladies and gentlemen.

Wait till they discover that the hordes of children were camouflaging how much their mall sucks on its own merits

Monday, November 5th, 2007

When I was a child, downtown Cleveland had something around three major department stores, the kind you actually had to visit an urban area to see. We went every winter to see Mr. Jing-a-ling, a Santa look-alike who hosted brunch; people had their bridal registries there and we traveled to these departments stores for special occasion clothes – suits, first communion dresses, formal dresses – that you just couldn’t find outside the glamorous big city. Even as late as 1986, going Downtown was kind of an experience.

Of course, now the pale imitation of a shopping center that replaced the now-defunct department stores of yore is falling on hard times, and it’s clearly not because it’s got the same Victoria’s Secret and Waldenbooks my local mall has; it must be those damn black kids!

A downtown Cleveland mall is implementing one of the nation’s toughest curfews on teenagers, joining a growing national trend among shopping centers that say loud, unruly youngsters drive away paying customers.

The mall, Tower City Center, said it would ban anyone under 18 after 2:30 p.m. unless he or she was accompanied by an adult.

What time does school get out again? Just askin’.

I’ve walked through this mall a couple of times. Yes, the kids are obnoxious douchebags, and the begging problem outside is quite annoying. But the kids are concentrated mainly in the movie theatre and the food court and you know what else is obnoxious? That horrible screeching thing installed in the alleys to keep the homeless from sleeping in them. So Cleveland’s mall has fallen on tough times, and like most Cleveland institutions, they’ve hit on a solution that is about as bad as the problem it was meant to solve.

Tower City is the 51st of the nation’s 1,104 large retail shopping centers to impose a curfew on minors, according to the International Council of Shopping Centers. But it is one of the few whose policy will be in effect seven days a week; most mall curfews restrict teenagers only on weekends or after 6 p.m., the council said.

The curfew is part of Tower City’s new Parental Involvement Program, which Krieger said was in keeping with “a national trend as retail centers seek to create a family-friendly atmosphere.”

Getting rid of the scary hordes of black child-thugs with their ‘hip-hop’ and their- I dunno, dark skin?- may help the “family-friendly” (euphemism for whatnow?) atmosphere, but why would Mr. & Mrs. WhiteFlight lug their kids all the way to the center of downtown to shop at Tower City when every damn mall around the ‘burbs offers the same basic stores and nearby Beachwood and Legacy Village offer way better pretentious luxury goods shopping Midwest-style (seriously, they have a Pottery Barn Kids, WTF?) and free parking?

“I know the kids can be kind of intimidating, especially for people that are from out of town or from outside of the city,” said Tishara Clement of Cleveland.

Who? Who is coming from out of town or outside of the city? Who? People don’t even come here to see the damn Rock and Roll Hall of Fame, who the hell is traveling from anywhere more distant than Parma to shop in our exclusive Lady Foot Locker?

Ah, yes, those imaginary people who are just dying to come to Cleveland if only we’d build a convention center or ban smoking or clap our hands, yes everybody, clap your hands!

On balance, said Krieger, of Tower City, many mall managers are concluding that it’s worth the loss of vitality and sales from younger visitors to lure back adults and out-of-towners who may be intimidated by loud groups of teenagers.

“The centers that have done this are really seeing their centers go up, and they’re seeing more families wanting to come back,” she said.

What is Yahoo! smoking?

Saturday, October 13th, 2007

I think I need to check Yahoo! more often. First, Fengi found this adorable pair of articles on how those elitist, overly educated single women need to lower their standards, play dumb, and give more blowjobs. Or something like that.

The most mind-boggling quote, to me, is this one, from “dating coach” and self-hating Jew Evan Marc Katz:

In real life, if you start talking to someone at a party who is intriguing, you’ll probably get a phone number and set up a date. You may not find out until later that he’s a different religion, or political party….For example, I’ve got a male dating-coaching client who is 24 and runs a multimillion-dollar corporation. He never got a college degree, so he wouldn’t appear in many women’s educational searches. Too bad for them. I’ve got a female client who is 64 and still goes hiking, fishing and skiing. She’s beautiful, youthful and vibrant, and completely off the radar for most men. It’s a shame, isn’t it?

While I think it’s fine to date outside of your social circles, I wonder why this sort of romantic advice so often encourages women to go out with anti-choice Republicans men with wildly different political views. I guess these relationships work sometimes, but I would have a hard time dating someone who thought that my body was his property. It’s just not sexy. If Republicans can’t get dates, which is I think what Katz’s advice suggests, maybe they should work on developing a less misogynist world view. Just a thought.

Anyway, that’s not the weirdest thing on Yahoo! lately. Hat-tip to Seaya for finding this charming little game, called Missionaries and Cannibals.

The kind missionaries can’t be left alone with too many evil cannibals, but they all have to cross a river in a small boat. Can you help them?

If you think that description is bad, wait until you see the graphics.

Video game fans prove that they aren’t racist by hurling racist slurs

Friday, August 3rd, 2007

Kym Platts at Ask This Black Woman/Black Looks posted the other day about some seriously problematic imagery in the new Resident Evil 5 game.

The new Resident Evil video game depicts a white man in what appears to be Africa killing Black people. The Black people are supposed to be zombies and the white man’s job is to destroy them and save humanity. “I have a job to do and I’m gonna see it through.”

This is problematic on so many levels, including the depiction of Black people as inhuman savages, the killing of Black people by a white man in military clothing, and the fact that this video game is marketed to children and young adults. Start them young… fearing, hating, and destroying Black people.

Now, my knowledge of RE goes about as far as having seen the first two movies (which I liked, incidentally), so I watched the trailer that Kym linked to. And yes, it is disturbing. Because while it’s fiction, with zombies, it can’t be read outside of a cultural context: European imperialist adventures on the African continent, slavery, eugenics, criminalization of Black people, media depictions of people of colour as subhuman and violent, and so on.

She made a good point, and those familiar with how the blogosphere works can guess what happened next. A bunch of white gamer boys immediately leaped on her with responses ranging from “reverse racism!” to “Get back into the cotton fields, you filthy [N-BOMB].” And death threats. Because she dared express an opinion on a video game.

Follow-up posts are here here and here. Stay away from the comments if you happen to be eating—these fanboys are as bloodthirsty as a horde of zombies and about as intelligent.

Group of angry drama queens threatened by internal strife, “gah! Mexicans!” edition.

Saturday, March 3rd, 2007

Got some dark corn syrup and Kaluha? Well, get thee to a grocery store, because it looks like it might be time to make a Schadenfreude pie for the Minutemen.

Internal strife is at an all-time high and there are ousters! And take-overs! And shrieky banners screaming “ALERT! HIJACKERS HAVE HIJACKED THIS SITE!” on the official minutemen website, which I would totally upload if I could so that you could see them in all their glory without dirtying your browser history with a visit to the actual site. After printing all the emails he’s recieved on the topic, Men’s News Daily’s Casey Hendrickson reduces the problem to its essence:

Question is … are the three “hijackers” really doing this because they feel Gilchrist is corrupt? Do they just want money, and power? Are they in fact working for the Mexican government?

OK, maybe he was a bit subtle, but you really do have to read all the recriminations in all the hysterical emails to really get why that last sentence (emphasis mine) is so very crazy. Casey’s harping on the accusation that the Minutemen’s conquorers have stolen email lists and pre-signed official stationary, while ignoring the conquorer’s accusations that Gilchrist was mismanaging donations in a way that they felt they’d be held accountable for when the IRS came a callin’. By immediately suggesting that the group’s boardmembers are puppets of the evil Mexican government, it’s clear that Casey is on the side of those who are willing to do any mental gymastics necessary to keep their faith in their charismatic leader. Which means that if the situation escalates, there will be bloggy fun for all!

From the sounds of it, either a) this is a very ordinary hate-group power struggle of the type that commonly tears newbie men’s rights groups and racist organizations asunder or b) Gilchrist actually has been mismanging funds. Either way, it’s time for pie. The pie, of course, is for the part of the drama that
has bubbled up into the mainstream. If in fact, Jim Gilchrist was fleecing the Minutemen’s money, then maybe sueing the people who kicked his ass out wasn’t the best idea. The board of directors claims to have “unreleased tape recordings” that will prove they did have the authority to kick the guy out. Oh, God, please let there be tape recordings, and please let them become public record.

Here’s looking foward to a long, resource-sucking, group-crippling clusterfuck of suits, counter-suits, and the public airing of dirty laundry.

Ali and rap

Wednesday, December 6th, 2006

Sports fans have probably already seen the article on ESPN, but music fans take note: Chuck Klosterman has some fascinating commentary on hip hop, the media, and Muhammed Ali.

I love it when a piece that, by all accounts, should be nothing more than synergistic network propaganda (ESPN is airing a doc called “Ali Rap”) turns out to be far more provocative than the event it’s promoting.

OK, for the last time. If you’re going to claim it was just a joke, at least make some attempt to make it funny.

Tuesday, December 5th, 2006

I thought about writing a post about how vile it is to use the holidays as an excuse to be more racist than you would normally be, but then I thought this would get in the way of my post on how wrong it is to hold kittens by the neck in your left hand and then punch them with your right. Or why it’s not a good idea to give drugs to your dog (my old manager at a restaurant I used to work at told me that one. Actually, he didn’t say it was bad, he said it was hilarious. But it sounded bad. Later he was fired for stealing meat.)

Then I noticed that the author of today’s racist piece filed it under “humor,” which confused me. Pretend for a moment that you find racist humor funny, and then read this.

I have developed a “How To” guide to assist true “Peace Loving” Muslims when traveling during the upcoming Holiday Season.

1. It’s completely ok to pray when flying or in an airport. I have done it every time I fly. If you chose to pray out loud, even loud enough to call attention to yourself and your group then that’s on you.

2. The Phrase, “Allahu Akbar, Allahu Akbar” in this country is the same as pulling a gun out as far as I’m concerned. Islamic Terrorists have used this phrase before exploding suicide bomb vests strapped to themselves. Islamic Terrorists have used it before beheading Jews and Christians in Afghanistan, Iraq, and even the Philippines. Don’t Say It! Don’t Use It! It’s a call to war and if you are treated like a red headed stepchild for saying it, then you deserved it!

3. When you get on the plane. Sit Your A$$ the F#*k Down and Stay In Your Seat! If your Islamic or Muslim or Middle Eastern, Don’t be switching seats and moving all over the place. Find a seat and sit the f*#k down! You will raise suspicion and you risk getting your a$$es kicked by freedom loving people who don’t desire to blow up, crash or meet some cartoon like Prophet and 72 virgins.

4. If you have a one way ticket and security wants to check your stuff…Live with it! The rest of us have to and so should you.

5. If you don’t need the seat belt extender, then don’t request it! In the wrong hands, it can be used as a weapon. If you wear a size 6 burkka then don’t ask for the seatbelt extender. It raises eyebrows and makes normal freedom loving people think to themselves….”Hmmm?!”

Get it? We have to do racial profiling because of 9/11! Bwaa-haa-haaaaa! Oh, god, it’s comedy gold! And it’s family friendly comedy gold, because all of the S’s in ass have been replaced with dollar signs. Or not. If you can get past the offensiveness, what you have left is pretty weak, comedy-wise.
(more…)

Don’t let a little racism get in the way of your holiday DVD shopping

Tuesday, November 21st, 2006

Apparently, Jerry Seinfeld heard Shakes’ Sis say she won’t be buying any more Seinfeld DVDs after Michael Richards openly pined for the good ol’ days of lynching and public n-bombs.

Shakes’ Sis also has the footage from Richards’ apology on Letterman, which came during Seinfeld’s appearance on the show. At the end of the interview, Seinfeld says he wanted to help a friend apologize to the country.

*ahem*
Bullshit.

Yeah, sure, maybe Jerry felt a little bit of “hey, my unquestionably racist buddy needs a break on national TV.” Being a multimillionaire one-trick Three Stooges wannabe is a tough racket. If he doesn’t get a chance to pretend he’s not a bigot, he might not be able to swindle more money mailing in third-rate stand-up gigs (except in the kinds of towns that name their high school mascot “Johnny Reb”).

Seinfeld has to know many fans will feel the same way Shakes’ Sis did about buying Seinfeld products in the future, and I think he foresees the kind of dip in his earnings potential that might prevent him from purchasing Grenada as an anniversary present for another future child bride.

If he really wanted to help Michael Richards, Seinfeld would suggest the assclown find some way to use his pile of money to actually work with people in the African-American community in some meaningful way instead of just letting him come on air and say there’s racism in all of us and he’s sorry he’s been a bad boy. When Letterman asked what else Richards was going to do other than apologize, Richards clearly hadn’t even _considered_ doing anything other than “personal work,” which I take to mean enhancing the diversity in his life. Which probably means hiring more black folk around his mansion and/or raising the pay of any he might’ve inadvertantly “forked in the ass.”

No way around it: Seinfeld trumpeted the apology hoping to earn holiday cash from more than just the KKK’s Amazon wish list.

The good news is that I’m sure Wal-Mart will order an extra batch of the season where Kramer burns the Puerto Rican flag. Maybe they can even set up an in-store display showing Richards festively lynching with a wreath one of the many black actors never hired on Seinfeld’s lilly-white show.

A series of minor meltdowns at MND & a picture’s worth a thousand thoughts

Wednesday, November 8th, 2006

Nothing like an election to bring out a softer side at Men’s News Daily.

A little humor, courtesy Carey “Marxists with vaginas haunt my nightmares” Roberts:

Bush Needs to Rein in Feminist Operatives

Tuesday night, President Bush’s Republican party hemorrhaged blood all over the TV screen. The Dems took control of the House of Representative and registered solid gains in the Senate. But the electoral losses certainly weren’t for Bush failing to appease the rad-fems.

I guess I’m just the ordinary kind of feminist, and not the rad-fem type, because I can’t recall a single thing Bush has ever done to appease me. Unless there is some alternate definition of “appease” that I am unaware of.

But while Bush failed to provoke the feminists against him, John Lillpop reveals the REAL reason Republicans suffered so many losses yesterday:

Of all of Bush’s wrongheaded notions, his foolish policy on border security and illegal immigration has been the most distressing. By sending American troops to fight and die in Iraq and Afghanistan while refusing to secure U.S. borders to prevent invasion by millions of illegal aliens from Mexico, Bush has sacrificed American sovereignty and security for cheap tomatoes and lettuce.

This sell-out of American interests to a foreign nation (Mexico) should cause Bush to be impeached and removed from office. Impeachment, if not actual removal, is an action long called for by real conservatives like Patrick Buchanan.

That’s right, of all the things we could impeach Bush for, the most important is his failure to plant a bunch of guns at the border we share with some poor brownish-colored people. Technically, I don’t think failing to needlessly plant a bunch of armed troops at the border of a country with which we are at peace is an impeachable offense. If it was, I would think it would have been in the list of things that lead to Clinton’s impeachment hearings.

PS: John really doesn’t like Mexicans.

But I’ll give John credit where credit is due: out of all the the MWD “Get out the vote” posts, John made the most convincing argument.
(more…)