when the status quo frustrates.

Funny you should say that

Monday, May 12th, 2008

I’ve been working on some pieces about the American criminal justice system, and I came across this:

“A person who has chosen to commit armed robbery, rape or kidnapping has chosen to do something with a strong possibility of causing the death of an innocent person,” Mr. Scheidegger said. “That choice makes it morally justified to convict the person of murder when that possibility happens.”Serving Life for Providing Car to Killers, Adam Liptak

The article is part of an interesting series in the NYT, American Exception, which deals with the often pathological ways American criminal justice differs from criminal justice systems in the rest of the world.

(A particularly jarring example: the rest of the world has abandoned life sentences without parole for juveniles. When the United Nations adopted a resolution calling for the abolution of the practice, the U.S. was the only dissenting nation.)

But let’s go back to the quote. Kent Scheidegger is a victims’ rights advocate. Perhaps I should rephrase—he’s an advocate for somehow helping the people designated as victims by the criminal justice system by throwing people behind bars, or in the chair. More people, in fact, than we currently are.

Here’s what he wrote in his 2006 testimony before the New Jersey Death Penalty Study Comission:

(more…)

They’re gonna kill Obama

Saturday, February 23rd, 2008

or let him be killed, apparently. That would be double-stuff good for The Powers That Be, having some racist gunhumper breeze through the non-existent deterrents and do in the primary threat to the status quo. Then they could avoid the tiresome hassle of ginning up some lame cover-up story for their operative/patsy.

Conveniently, you’d also get a new wave of irrational mortality hysteria everywhere, with people forking over their votes and their rights once more to cuddle up in bed with ma and pa warmonger. Talk about synergy.

Speaking truth to power when you’re a sincere threat to acquire some of that power just ain’t gonna fly in modern America.

Ask the Kennedys.

Look at the bright side: nobody will even care about a depression when global warming’s kicking our asses

Saturday, February 9th, 2008

I guess when a country ponders approving a 3 trillion dollar budget when it’s already 9 trillion in the red, the idea of anyone ever actually paying off their bills must seem like a sucker bet. At least, that’s what certain “optimists” are *hoping* is the case when our little tax rebates start showing up in the mail:

The tax relief is intended to jump-start the economy. Politicians, worried about a recession in an election year, put aside their normal bickering to speed the proposal through Congress.

Nonetheless, there is debate over how effective it will be. Critics say debt-burdened consumers will use the money to pay bills rather than spending the checks and spurring growth.

An Associated Press-Ipsos poll found that only 19 percent of those surveyed said they planned to spend their rebate checks. Forty-five percent said they would pay off bills, while 32 percent said they planned to invest the money.

Supporters of the proposal said they have faith that people will spend the money when they get it.

“When you ask people what they will do with the money, they often say they will pay off their credit card bills,” said David Wyss, chief economist at Standard & Poor’s in New York. “People may mean it when they say it, but when you look at what they actually do, most of the money gets spent.”

Emphasis mine. Poor word choice is the AP’s.

The logic goes like this: people get their tax rebates, and instead of paying off new bills, they simply acquire more stuff. That infusion of cash into the economy supposedly turns our recession into more of a mild downturn. Disaster averted… today. But personal American debt is as out of control as the government’s and the legislators and economists supporting the rebate are literally banking on it staying that way. These bills will come due someday, though, just like they did in the subprime mortgage fiasco.

Economists and legislators pray that Americans continue to mismanage their long-term financial health so that we might nibble upon the tiniest morsel of temporary economic relief. And this is the norm. American economic policy of the last 30+ years has been designed to continually keep us afloat for the present moment, but by pushing back so many of the normal valleys that are supposed to accompany our peaks, we’ve simply collected all of them into a giant clump of gunk under the bed. One of these days, that clump’s going to become sentient, open its eyes, and in its repressed rage lay waste to everything around it.

But hey, hopefully that won’t happen in an election year, right?

“Fighting them there so we don’t have to fight them here” was a slogan, not a plan.

Saturday, February 2nd, 2008

Six years, umpteen godzillion dollars and a Patriot Act later and this is all we got?

While the Defense Department conducts exhaustive planning for operations overseas, its planning for possible action inside the United States in response to attacks is inadequate, said the Commission on the National Guard and Reserves.

“We looked at their plans. They’re totally unacceptable,” said commission chairman Arnold Punaro, a retired Marine Corps major general.

“You couldn’t move a Girl Scout unit with the kind of planning they’re doing,” Punaro said

There’s a very good reason for this however: first, we’ve kind of ground the forces we have into tired shell-shocked overdeployed troop nubbins, and second, the brass left prefers petty inter-force fingerpointing and question-dodging to planning for domestic security.

Officials at Northern Command would not discuss the commission’s report, saying the Pentagon would first review the panel’s nearly 100 recommendations…

But the military has not dedicated sufficient time or resources to prepare for such a role, despite the creation of Northern Command after the September 11, 2001, attacks, according to the commission, created by Congress to study the best use of reserve forces.

That is partly because of historical tension between the federal government and states, the commission said. Defense officials also say the military sees its role in domestic emergencies in large part as supporting civilian agencies…

But since the 1990s, the Guard and Reserve have been used more regularly in combat. The availability of those forces, for example, has allowed Washington to conduct the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan without a draft, the commission said.

Repeated deployments to those wars strained reserve troops, their equipment and their families

Well, then at least we can assume Iraq & Afghanistan are going swimmingly, right, since the Pentagon is neglecting this hemisphere to work over there, right? Right?

Oh, OK then.

Won’t somebody think of the phone companies?!

Saturday, January 26th, 2008

Hooray! The extremely popular White House wielded its unstoppable positive momentum again this week:

A White House plan to broaden the National Security Agency’s wiretapping powers won a key procedural victory in the Senate on Thursday, as backers defeated a more restrictive plan by Senate Democrats that would have imposed more court oversight on government spying.

The vote moves the Bush administration a step closer toward the twin goals it has pursued for months: strengthening the N.S.A.’s ability to eavesdrop without court approval, while securing legal immunity for the phone companies that have helped the agency in its wiretapping operations.

[...]

After the more restrictive measure was defeated, Caroline Fredrickson, director of the American Civil Liberties Union’s Washington office, said, “It appears the Senate is buckling under pressure from the White House.”

Pressure? What pressure is the White House in position to exert? This is like Muhammad Ali being sucker-punched by an 8-year-old with a bone disease. Bush remains as unpopular as Nixon ever was; can you imagine the post-Watergate Nixon strong-arming Congress into violating the Constitution *again* after said Congress was elected on a mandate to stop precisely this sort of nonsense?

Ah, but it doesn’t take long to find more evidence of my new favorite theme, the two-sides-of-the-same-coin-ery going on between Republicans and Democrats. Because, really, as the lobbyist with a briefcase full of cash and blow would say, can’t we all just get along?

But Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Jay Rockefeller (D., W.Va.) defended the immunity provision, which he supported after reviewing the documents requesting phone company participation. “The companies believed their cooperation was necessary, legal and would help stop future terrorist attacks,” Mr. Rockefeller said. “Whether you agree or not with the president’s legal rationale is a separate issue.”

Hey, that last part almost sounds like a criticism of the White House — Senator Rockefeller better watch out for the kid’s left hook!

Come on, Jay. No phone company could ever have honestly believed that warrant-less wiretapping was legal. Requests to expressly violate contract terms in ways even graduates of Regent University School of Law could see were unconstitutional wouldn’t have made it through their legal departments without being buried in red ink.

But I’m glad someone paid you to feel that way. Again.

Let’s just save time: I’m Kyso Kisaen, my SSN is 123-45-678 and I bank at Sky, online banking password: snoodles.

Sunday, January 20th, 2008

Everyone who is queasy about RealID will find this post to be helpful when explaining to people why:

The story of Fidencio Estrada, a drug runner who bribed Florida Customs agent Rafael Pacheco to (among other things) access multiple federal law enforcement databases on his behalf, suggests that when it comes to the government collecting data on innocent civilians for law enforcement purposes, privacy and security are essentially the same thing…

So the government wants to collect tons of detailed data on citizens in these large databases; meanwhile, the speed at which an attacker could siphon off that data is increasing, as is the frightening but real possibility that ever-larger swaths of that database can fit onto a single lost or purloined hard drive.

No less than two University-owned laptop computers with my social security number on their hard drives have been lost or stolen in the last year. I got a letter from a company I’d never done business with stating that my personal information may have been stolen by a rogue employee; turns out this was the company that handled debit and electronic check transactions for some store that I had done business with, although God alone knows which store.

Can’t wait for RealID. I’m beginning to grow accustomed to the low-level stress of knowing that pretty much anyone can find my information and fuck me over pretty much anytime and there’s little I can do about it, and I’ll need the sphincter-clenching awareness that identity thieves are about to be given convenient one-stop shopping to keep my anxiety levels at their usual high.

Civilized human beings

Tuesday, August 21st, 2007

Another day of SPP talks and protests, another mindboggling quote from CCCE president Thomas D’Aquino. In reference to the protesters’ displeasure at the fact that elected representatives and the public aren’t being consulted on the SPP, he said:

I do not say to myself, ‘If I don’t get an hour with the prime minister in the next six months, I’m going to go out and protest and reject the system outright. I don’t do that because civilized human beings — those who believe in democracy — don’t do that.

One might argue that civilized human beings who believe in democracy don’t sign away national sovereignty in closed-door meetings. At the teach-in last Sunday, Michael Byers, one of the panelists, gave a shout-out to the cops who were no doubt in the audience, mentioning that unlike the leaders in Montebello, our meetings are open, and we have nothing to hide. I found it interesting that representatives of all major Canadian parties except the Conservatives attended the teach-in. Even the relatively right-wing Liberals, who held power when the SPP talks began, seem to feel a bit queasy at the direction that the discussion is taking.

In a functional democracy, protest is not simply a right. It’s a duty. This wouldn’t occur to someone like D’Aquino, who gets an hour with the Prime Minister whenever he wants, as well as more input into decision-making than politicians get. But his comments highlight something that I kept pondering as I marched beside anarchists, communists, social democrats, liberals, trade unionists, members of various targeted and racialized communities, and whack-job conspiracy theorists. Despite the earnestness of the demonstrators, despite the fact that many of us are stridently anti-capitalist and “reject the system outright”; the collective demands themselves are not radical. They aren’t even really reformist. They’re the sorts of things that we’re taught in high school civics class to be intrinsic to democracy and civil society: Stop meeting in secret. Debate policy in Parliament; that’s what it’s for. Consult the public.

That these demands, in the current political climate, are considered controversial at all is a damning indictment of how far we’ve drifted in the direction of oligarchy. The revolution we need looks more like the one of 1789 than of 1917.

Speaking of civility, check out this video from yesterday’s protest (hat-tip to Ariel):

Dave Coles, president of the Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union, manages to stop a protester from throwing rocks in the family-friendly “green zone.” It seems that the “protester” is actually a cop or provocateur: Unlike when demonstrators normally get arrested, the cops don’t beat him, and while he scuffles with the other protesters who try to hold him back, he doesn’t struggle with the police at all. The other anarchists don’t seem to know him and don’t try to protect him or object to his arrest. He’s led quietly behind police lines. No word yet on who he is or whether he’s one of the handful of arrests (I’m guessing not).

Conclusion: Cop, sent to stir things up, discredit the demonstrators, and justify a police crackdown. It doesn’t seem to have worked, though. Remind me who the civilized ones are, again?

Quite important but frankly quite boring

Monday, August 20th, 2007

Ottawa SPP protest
I have a lot more photos from the protest here, so check them out.

The media can’t really explain it. The governments of three countries have been very vague about it, to the point where most elected representatives don’t know what it is. And yet, some people seem rather upset about it.

Until a few days ago, when mass protests around the Three Amigos’ summit in Montebello, Québec, forced the media to pay a bit of attention, most people in the three affected countries had not heard of the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP). Even the alternative media and the blogosphere is suspiciously quiet—probably because it’s hard to both find information about the issue and to explain it in the convenient soundbytes and talking points to which we’re all accustomed. Thomas D’Aquino, of the Canadian Council of Chief Executives, describes the content of the talks (which have been taking place for the last two years) as: “quite important but frankly quite boring.”

We wouldn’t want to bore the people whose lives are likely to be radically changed by this thing. That’s why you’re not being consulted—in fact, your elected representatives aren’t even being consulted. Only the top military brass, corporate elite, and national leaders need to be concerned. Don’t you worry your pretty little head about it. After all, don’t they always have your best interests at heart?

This is why I don’t believe in most conspiracy theories, incidentally. There’s no need for them. If your leaders are planning something distasteful for you—say, treaties or agreements that would attack your health and environment, strip what little labour protection you currently enjoy, curtail your freedom of movement, and embroil you in illegal wars—they don’t need to invent elaborate means to hide it from you. They can simply bury the issues in alphabet soup, discuss their plans in remote locations, and tell you that it’s too boring for you to need to read about.

Anyway, the 5,000 or so people who converged in Ottawa yesterday evidently didn’t find the subject boring at all. I was there, participating in the rally, march, and teach-in meant to tell the world about what’s going on today and tomorrow in Montebello. I was terribly impressed at the ability of the organizing groups—particularly the Council of Canadians—to accomplish what our media and politicians couldn’t do; namely, explain what the SPP is and why we should all care.
(more…)

Why I still hate Democrats —SO MUCH—

Sunday, August 5th, 2007

You know who doesn’t normally have a lot of power? A dude actively disliked by over 60% of his supervisors.

Someone should really tell that to the idgit Democrats in Congress, though, who bluster about rights and justice and then bend over and stuff a poster tube in their ass to give the Republicans better access to the good stuff:

Under pressure from President George W. Bush, the House of Representatives has given final approval to changes in a terrorist surveillance program despite serious objections from many Democrats about the scope of the executive branch’s new eavesdropping power.

Ooooh, serious objections! I’m shitting my pants. I bet all those Republicans who *almost* didn’t get their way are still tossing and turning over those objections and their ramifications. If there’s one thing that puts fear into the hearts of facists everywhere, it’s a serious objection. Heck, Dick Cheney called me the other day because he heard I seriously objected to the war in Iraq, and he just wanted to make sure I knew my feelings were duly noted.

(more…)

Americans don’t need no stinking immigrants serving their frozen drinks or rescuing their children from drowning.

Thursday, July 19th, 2007

Every cloud has a silver lining. The best part about any needlessly reactionary legislative battle is waiting for the unintended consequences to pop up. Like remember when a bunch of states made vague anti-gay-marriage Constitutional amendments and now it’s harder in those states to get a DV conviction if you’re not married to the guy who’s punching you? That will always be the classic example, but now we have another example that is almost as good.

Remember that Senate immigration bill clusterfuck? The one that when we heard ‘immigrant’ we were supposed to think ‘Mexican’? The one that pleased exactly no one?

Well, it turns out that there are other countries besides Mexico, and some of the people who live in those countries would like to work in America for a short amount of time. Who knew? And we’re not talking filthy brown leprosy-spreading farmhands, here – we’re talking about the sexy young Eastern Europeans who guard your pools and ski slopes. Yes, that’s right, in our rush to prevent the bad kind of immigrant- you know, your poor huddled masses yearning to breathe free- from undercutting Americans who might want to do excruciating farm work under an unrelenting sun for sub-minimum wages, we accidentally hurt those we need the most: the young foreign adventure-seekers who keep our seasonal attractions running smoothly.

Among the casualties when the bill collapsed was the expansion of a visa program called H-2B, which allows employers to recruit 66,000 foreigners a year to fill jobs for up to six months. The bill would have lifted the cap to 100,000 and would also have made permanent an exemption that now allows in thousands more temporary workers but is set to expire on Sept. 30.

H-2B has become so popular among resort operators, race tracks, casinos, landscapers and others that this summer’s supply of visas ran out in March. Democratic Sen. Barbara Mikulski of Maryland, where the seafood industry depends on Mexican H-2B workers to pick the meat from Chesapeake Bay crabs for canning, has vowed to attach an expansion of the program to other legislation.

Ignore the bit about the crab canning, because we will not be seeing too much of those Mexicans again for the rest of the article.

Stephen Lavery, president of Virginia-based High Sierra Pools Inc., says that he hired neighborhood kids as lifeguards when he began his pool-management company 18 years ago, but that the labor source soon began to dry up. College students began taking internships that would buff their post-graduation résumés, or sought jobs they could continue during the school year. High-school students signed up for summer courses or exotic travel to build up their college applications.

…Mr. Lavery, whose company provides lifeguards and maintenance to 250 Washington-area pools, says his first H-2B hires a dozen years ago were Germans. But the dollar has weakened against the euro and Western European students have flocked to European Union countries where they don’t need visas and can earn more money.

That has forced pool operators to recruit further east each year. This year for the first time, Mr. Lavery has workers from Kazakhstan and Russia, in addition to such mainstay H-2B suppliers as Bulgaria and the Czech Republic. “I’ve heard there’s options in Thailand,” he says.

This actually does suck a lot because the H-2B seems like a great way to see America. It kind of makes me wish I’d typed “work in Europe” into Google at least once back when I had summers free:

On a recent bright Saturday, Patricia Fajtova, a 21-year-old Slovak marketing student, explained how she came to be sitting guard at an apartment-house pool in Washington using a temporary cultural-exchange visa: “I typed ‘work in the USA’ into the Google,” and up popped the Sierra Pools Web site, she said.

…All three women said they opted for jobs in the U.S. after concluding that careers and marriage will soon limit their opportunities to visit. “We have more chance to see Europe later,” said Ms. Ivosevic.

So this was kind of a win-win situation for everyone. Sure, it was kind of a pain in the ass for employeers, but they were clearly getting quality workers and young people were getting an opportunity to fund some travel and anyone who’s worked seasonal jobs at recreational facilities knows that that’s normally a blast. I’d worked in an amusement park for three summers, and I’d jump all over the chance to do that in Spain or Germany or even Japan.

Then we had to go all “gahh! Mexicans!” And while we absolutely failed to do anything useful about the Mexican ‘problem’ (whether you defined the problem as the mere presence of Mexicans in America or the way they’re exploited once they get here) we did manage to bone our ski resort managers and those nice Slovakian kids who guard the community pool. Good on us.* I guess we’ll put that in the ‘ironic victories’ pile, with all the others.

*Since this will largely inconvenience those with the means to go skiing or to resorts, I actually mean that. Somethings got to wake these people up because if we were thinking then this sort of thing wouldn’t be happening, right?

Who could have seen this awful tragedy coming?! Besides all the people who did, of course.

Monday, May 7th, 2007

Terrorists could strike again at any moment — you don’t, nay, CAN’T know when it’ll happen again.

We were caught completely unawares by the villainy on 9/11… except for those memos floating around indicating plane-based attacks by al-Qaeda were imminent. Oh, and those briefings in which certain a “high level” government official told analysts they had covered their asses by explaining the same thing.

IT COULD HAPPEN AGAIN ANY TIME ANYWHERE WITHOUT WARNING. At least, that’s what the media and certain fearmongers in the White House would like to have us believe, even though we actually did have plenty of warning even before we turned up our espionage, torture, and paranoia to 11.

But it isn’t just foreign terrorist boogeymen we’re supposed to fear — I’ve heard the same tropes rolled out in conjunction with the Virginia Tech killings by Seung-Hui Cho. Talking heads on multiple networks have droned on and on that ANYONE at ANY TIME could be the next Cho, and that we should all be very afraid. Certain state governors are so convinced of this they believe we should carry loaded weapons on us in church and at bars just in case.

Of course, Cho didn’t just act without warning, either. Not only did his neighbors and classmates know he was deeply creepy, but he was found to be a threat and ordered by the courts to receive mental health treatment:

The gunman who killed 32 people at Virginia Tech failed to get the mental health treatment ordered by a judge who declared him an imminent threat to himself and others, a newspaper reported Monday.

Seung-Hui Cho was found “mentally ill and in need of hospitalization” in December 2005, according to court papers. A judge ordered him into involuntary outpatient treatment.

What happened? Well, it turns out no one followed up on the court’s orders. Mental health officials and the court itself failed to enforce the ruling.

You can’t sum it up any better than this:

“The system doesn’t work well,” said Tom Diggs, executive director of the Commission on Mental Health Law Reform, which has been studying the state mental health system and will report to the General Assembly next year.

Our court system labeled Cho a risk and ordered him to be put away but no one actually did it… which is kinda like how our president knew we were at risk before 9/11 but failed to act.

Our media and our government create the perception that plane terrorists and gun terrorists spontaneously appear and perform acts of horror like silent ninjas skipping over tripwires. But the truth is that the alarm has almost always been sounded. The only question is whether anyone bothered to respond to it.

Supporting our troops since 2001! [Disclaimer: any soldier dumb enough to get hurt in the line of battle no longer qualifies as a 'troop' and therefore does not deserve our support.]

Thursday, April 12th, 2007

If Ricky Bobby taught me one thing, it’s that America is for winners. You win, you reap the rewards. You lose, you deserve the kicking-to-the-curb that’s coming to you.

Don’t believe me? Just ask the US government, who’s knowingly taking advantage of soldiers so bad at their jobs they couldn’t keep from getting hurt:

The way the government rates service members’ disabilities is inconsistent, and the Army might be shortchanging injured soldiers, the chairman of a special commission said Thursday.

Fantastic system we have now. We recycle soldiers who expected to be done serving or are in desperate need of a break right back into unjust combat duty. We don’t equip them properly or provide them ample body protection. And now, when they get injured, we screw around with them.

And why? Because if you aren’t willing stop a bullet with your teeth or psychically sense mines and IEDs, you’ve failed to demonstrate your committment to our national excellence. Either that, or you just don’t measure up.

The first phase in ostracizing losertroops like that is to care for them poorly:

Among the complaints are the difficulties troops and veterans have in navigating the health care system, including long waits, lost paperwork and subjective ratings as they move from military hospitals to the VA’s vast network of 1,400 clinics and treatment facilities.

Once that’s done, we make sure the Department of Defense intentionally underclassifies the seriousness of their injuries so we can stiff them:

While the differing standards account for some inconsistencies, “it is also apparent that DOD has strong incentive to assign ratings less than 30 percent so that only separation pay is required,” [Lt. Gen. James Terry] Scott said in testimony.

The final step is to make sure they know you won’t be doing anything about their problems any time soon:

“A full solution is still several years away,” Deputy Defense Secretary Gordon England said, while offering assurances that he and Nicholson do confer “when issues need to be addressed at our level.”

If God doesn’t love you enough to keep you healthy on the battlefield, our government’s made it crystal clear it doesn’t need you or want you around.

I look forward to the day when these soldiers are sterilized. That way, we’ll have fewer loserdescendants around to gum up our well-oiled combat machine.