when the status quo frustrates.

Oh Poker, Thy Name is Misogyny

Monday, September 14th, 2009

I don’t think I’ve discussed that aspect of poker much in the past, though I’m sure that nobody is surprised to hear that it is a very large part of the poker culture. Of the poker professionals out there, very few are female, and those who are generally frame themselves as the sex-kitten-who-just-happens-to-play-poker–it’s a great hook and makes them a lot of dough via sponsors–generally what I think of as the Danica Patrick marketing strategy. (Jennifer Harman is one exception to that, but I honestly can’t think of any others right now.)

I am not infrequently the only woman at my table when I play poker, and even when I’m not, there’s rarely more than one other (there are usually eight to ten people at a table total). I’ve gotten spoiled, though–I’ve mostly been playing with the same pool of folks now for a couple of years, so they all know me–they know that how I play has absolutely nothing to do with any gender dynamics they might want to introduce to the situation, let’s say. However, Saturday night, I wound up making it all the way to the final table in the tourney I was in–in fact, made it to the point where there was only one other player left and me competing for the win.

I didn’t (and still don’t) know the guy’s name–he wasn’t someone I’d ever played with before. We’d just spent about forty minutes together at the final table, but we hadn’t been in any hands together (it’s not unusual not to be in any hands with me for forty minutes–I am a folding machine). I do recall, though, when he looked up from his chips and realized that there was nobody else left at the table but him and me–he fixed his gaze on mine and got the biggest, brightest smile on his face. Then he pushed out a pile of chips–a big one, about a third of his stack. “I’m betting this,” he said, grinning at me.

“Can’t,” I said. The tournament director had come over to shuffle and deal for us and was busy with the cards. “You can’t straddle* in this league.”

He ignored me. “Hey, W,” I said to the director. “No straddling, right?”

“Nope,” said the director, and flicked a glance over at my competitor. “Put ‘em back.”

Still grinning, he lazily pulled his chips back to his main pile, one and two at a time. “But that’s what I’m gonna bet,” he said.

Oh sigh. I ignored him til the cards were dealt; without so much as a glance down at his own, he tossed out a similar pile of chips–if he’d put the smirk away while I hadn’t been looking, it was back full force now, coupled with a pointed stare deep into my eyes.

I peeked under my cards. Queen-ten suited–not a monster, by any means–but–”Oh,” I said, and looked up at him, and finally grinned back at him with the biggest wattage I could muster. “Well. I’m all in.” I scooped up my entire chip stack and placed it carefully in front of my cards.

His grin vanished abruptly, just like it’d been slapped off his face (which it pretty much had). “Oh really,” he said.

“Really,” I said. I was feeling genuinely cheerful now. Slowly, he looked under his cards, then back up at me–no intently smirking stare now, one couldn’t help but notice.

“Really,” he said.

“Yep,” I said. I blinked innocently at him. “You might wanna look at your cards first, before you bet, next time…”

The girl sitting next to him watching, who hadn’t said a word all evening, suddenly grinned. “I like her,” she said.

Now, what just happened..?

Well, if you play poker, you know. It is a very common, and honestly a very successful, strategy, to identify the weak player (or weaker players, if you’re lucky and there’s more than one) at a table and bully him (or them). A weak player is a fearful player, who unless he has the absolute nuts** can usually be frightened out of a hand by a show of aggression. There is nothing wrong with doing this; it’s part of the game.

However, you should never confuse weak with tight. A tight player will fold to a raise if he doesn’t have pot odds–and sometimes other players will misunderstand this and mistakenly think that they have scared him out of the hand, rather than it being a reasoned mathematical decision. However, it usually doesn’t take long for them to realize their mistake–all it takes is trying to push him out with bad cards on a bluff, getting called and losing chips to teach them a valuable (if sometimes painful) lesson.

Another thing you should never do, that male players often regularly attempt on any new female player until they are thrashed out of the possession of this very bad idea, is assume that a player can be intimidated by them simply because she is a woman. And it was so, so painfully obvious that was the dynamic that even our casual female spectator got quite a kick out of watching him get caught out stark naked on it.

*”Straddle” means, technically, to bet double the big blind before the cards are dealt–it’s also used more generally just to mean betting at all before the cards are dealt, though.
**”Nuts” are the best possible hand at that point in the game.

Poker Tales, v4.0

Wednesday, July 15th, 2009

Has it really been a year since I blogged about the awesomeness that is poker? Yes, it has been!–to the day, which is actually a little eerie now that I think about it–maybe I should sit on this post til at least tomorrow or something…

…nah. I feel like doing some poker blogging, darn it, so that’s what I’m gonna do. (Feel free to skip the rest of this post if you don’t share the love, though–like my World of Warcraft blogs, if you don’t play, you’ll probably die of boredom less than halfway through it.)

SO, for anyone that’s still breathlessly hanging on to the edge of his or her keyboard–a friend of mine (we’ll call him by his online poker handle, “FargnBastage”) recently emailed me a poker tale of his and invited me to share my opinion on it. Anyone who loves to play poker, usually also loves to analyze other people’s play to death! (We like to tell ourselves that it improves our game to do this, but most likely it’s just because we’re a bunch of total nerds at heart.) Here it is:

I was sitting the in the cutoff seat in an unraised pot with 7 callers. 35 bucks in with the blinds yet to act. I look at 3-4h and I like suited connectors, especially when I have position, so I make it 40 to go just trying to steal. Blinds fold, under the gun calls and they guy is seat 5 raises to 80. I’m thinking uh-oh, but it only costs me another 40 to see a flop. There’s like 225 in the pot if I call and the under the gun player calls, so it makes sense right?. Flop comes A-2-5 rainbow and I barely bat an eye. Goes check check. I bet 80 trying to represent a big A and wanting callers… under the gun folds seat five raises to 200. We both have pretty big stacks and I’m sure he’s got AA or AK. It took me about 3 seconds to push with $885 and he calls me immediately and flips up the bullets like I’m a dumbass. He Heh, I show my wheel and he about crapped.*

I am going to share my opinion of the hand, but I want to give anyone else interested in providing his or her own opinion a shot without contaminating their call–so I’ll update this Thursday or Friday with my take on it. Til then, if you’d like, leave yours in comments! :)

*For those of you not deeply familiar with poker slang, a translation is provided below the fold. Or you can just check out the Punkass Poker Translator(tm)!

(more…)

Trust Me When I Tell You Which Guy You Want To Run Your Country.

Thursday, July 3rd, 2008

If you are not familiar with craps, it is a game played with dice, and the important thing to know about it is that you cannot win at it unless you figure out some way to control how you throw the dice…ie, you cheat. You CANNOT win by playing by the rules. It is a mathematical impossibility.

You can, however, win at poker, to the point where some people actually play it as a full-time job.

Craps requires that you throw dice, can count up to twelve and add single-digit numbers in your head up to a total of twelve. You don’t need to know anything else; you can if you wish control your rate of loss by learning the odds of the various bet types and rolls, but as you’re going to lose repeatedly no matter what, it doesn’t really matter if you do or not.

Poker requires that you learn how many cards are in a standard playing deck, what suits those cards are, what the non-numerical cards mean and how they are ranked, what the different poker hands are and how they are ranked, just to play a single hand. If you want to win, you must then learn the statistical probabilities of each hand, modified by how many players are in the game; what the various positions at the table mean in terms of increasing or decreasing your odds, and how to calculate the odds of your hand winning versus how much of your bet it requires to win the entire table of bets. This is more math than most people exercise during their adult lives already.

So, think about the kind of person who would get hooked on craps–a mindless low-skill game where you are guaranteed to lose–versus the kind of person who would get hooked on poker–a psychologically and mathematically complex game where if you’re willing to work at it you’re guaranteed to win.

Or:

“Enjoying craps opens up a window on a central thread constant in John’s life,” says John Weaver, McCain’s former chief strategist, who followed him to many a casino. “Taking a chance, playing against the odds.”

Or:

[Obama] always had his head in the game. The stakes were low enough — $1 ante and $3 top raise — to afford a long shot. Not Obama. He studied the cards as closely as he would an eleventh-hour amendment to a bill. The odds were religion to him. Only rarely did he bluff. “He had a pretty good idea about what his chances were,” says Denny Jacobs, a former state senator from East Moline.

And:

McCain’s campaign, like his life, has been marked by its embrace of living dangerously and by clear runs of fortune and disappointment. Obama, meanwhile, has succeeded, no less remarkably, by diligently executing a premeditated strategy.

Thanks, Time Magazine!

Think “delicate international situation.” Think “perilous economic balance.” Think–

Let’s go Obaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaama ’08!

Poker Tales, v3.0

Sunday, June 15th, 2008

Last Saturday was a little unusual for me–I played both tournament AND cash poker in the same day! (Besides unusual, this was also awesome–all poker all the time!) I can’t blame my mediocre showing in the tournament (37th out of 120) on an inability to switch playing styles quickly enough; the tournament actually came first chronologically. Really, it was a combination of two factors, one of which I had no control over and one which I did have control over and am therefore a little embarrassed about.

(more…)

Poker Tales, v2.0

Saturday, May 17th, 2008

Kibby Playing Poker

I played in two tournaments this week and made the final table in both–ninth in the first tournament and third in the second. (Unfortunately they both only paid to third place, so I only “won” anything the second time, and what I “won” was a gift certificate to the place that hosted the tournament–wheee!) But I can’t complain TOO much cause I did reasonably well. The first tournament started with about 60 players and the second started with about 40 players. Both started with 4000 chips, with a 2000 chip-up around the third or fourth blind.

Just really two things to come out of my tourney adventures this week–some ruminating on the differences between a Hold ‘Em tournament and a Hold ‘Em cash table, and the really cool thing that happened at my first table in the first tourney. First the ruminating…

(more…)

Poker Tales, v1.0

Monday, April 28th, 2008

I played in two cash games this past weekend, one on Friday night and one on Saturday night. At the game Friday night, not only did I lose the entirety of my original buy-in, I bought in AGAIN, lost all that and then bought in a THIRD TIME (I managed to break even on that buy-in). My humiliation the next day knew no bounds, even though I was patted and hugged repeatedly by my fellow player and reassured that yes, I am still lovable even when I sucked the hairy butt cheese at poker.

Never say I can’t learn from my mistakes, though! Saturday night, not only did I not buy in after my original chip purchase that night, by the time we left the game, I had tripled up. Self-esteem was RESTORED!

(more…)

The Punkass Poker Translator(tm)

Wednesday, April 23rd, 2008

A small sampling of what’s often heard ’round the poker table:

“I’m all in!”
“Is that supposed to be, some kinda position raise or something?”
“What you got under there, man? Big slick? Cowboys?”
“Probably ducks.”
“Oooh, dead man’s hand. Against…what is that shit?”
“This is my favorite hand!”
“Why am I not surprised that a flat tire’s your favorite hand? Fuckin’ donkey. Oh wait, yeah, they’re SUITED!”
“Damn, he just flopped the nuts.”
“Big blind special!”

Yeah. As in, huh..?

Now, you can sit tight at the poker table and try to brazen your way through this and hope that the blank expression on your face is taken for inscrutability instead of total confusion. OR, you can whip out the Punkass Poker Translator(tm) and fake your way to a real poker reputation!

Poker terms tend to describe one of 3 things: the players, the cards, or the situation. We’ll start with the players.

Fish: Someone who does not often bet or raise, but plays pretty much every hand he can afford regardless of how good it is. Identifiable by his cry, “I gotta see the flop!” (note: Flop (flop) n. The first three community cards dealt to the table.)

Rock: Someone who does not often bet or raise, but is religious about playing only good hands. Identifiable by the way the other players flee the table whenever he reaches for his chips to place a bet, as they all know he only does that when he’s got the best hand out there.

Shark: Someone who bets and raises aggressively, but is also very careful about only playing good hands. Identifiable by the way the other players try to impress him and be his friend, partly because they admire his skill and partly because they hope if he likes them he’ll go easy on them.

Maniac: Someone who bets and raises aggressively and plays pretty much every hand he gets regardless of how good it is. Identifiable by the fact that whatever table he’s sitting at fills up last and the glares of the players that end up stuck with him.

Calling station: Someone who, once he has decided to be in a hand, absolutely will not fold his cards, whether the hand is shaping up well or not. He will call every bet any other player makes, regardless of how insanely much or little it is. Identifiably by his cry, “I call!” Often to the point where people begin referring to him as that.

Donkey: Someone who does not know how to play, even after playing for months or even years. Why he is unable to learn is a complete mystery. Identifiable by the fact that other players don’t talk to him if they can possibly help it no matter how hard he tries to get them to do so and the look of agony on their faces when he manages to trap them in a conversation about “strategy.”

(more…)

Texas Hold ‘Em 101

Sunday, April 20th, 2008

It sounds like some poker posting is on the table! (pun so not intended)

As I think we’re all coming into this with wildly divergent levels of familiarity and interest, I am going to try to please all the people all the time by writing a thorough yet succinct post that masterfully combines the basics of the game with a few more advanced concepts and experiences. Yep, even though this approach rarely if ever actually succeeds, usually ending up by leaving everyone including the author unsatisfied, my glass is half full, I believe I can make it work! Specifically, my wine glass over here next to my laptop is half full for the third time this evening. Confidence lube!

Wikipedia has a very nice article with a lot of very good detailed reference links for anyone who is interested in really getting into the hand and betting structures of the game, which I am not going to get into here. I will however shamelessly steal some of the high points from them and summarize below:

[Texas] Hold ‘em is a community card game where each player may use any combination of the five community cards and the player’s own two hole cards to make a poker hand. Because each player only starts with two cards and the remaining cards are shared, it presents an opportune game for strategic analysis (including mathematical analysis). Most [Texas Hold 'Em] books recommend a strategy that involves playing relatively few hands but betting and raising often with the hands one plays.

Let me reemphasize that last part. “playing relatively few hands but betting and raising often with the hands one plays” Again! cause you just can’t get too much of a good thing: “PLAYING RELATIVELY FEW HANDS BUT BETTING AND RAISING OFTEN WITH THE HANDS ONE PLAYS!!” (clearly I’m hoping that at least one of the donkeys I regularly play with happens across this post, or even just this one little paragraph…c’mon, man..!)

The importance of mathematical analysis to Texas Hold ‘Em cannot be overemphasized, either. The cards you get, the other players get and what goes in the community card pile is of course entirely random, based upon four suits of thirteen sequential cards. However, whether or not you win at Texas Hold ‘Em is all about your ability to do two things–minimize the monetary damage your lost hands will cause and maximize the monetary returns of your winning hands–and about doing so over time. Any idiot can win a tournament or double up in a cash game once, and the best players have endured short-term losing streaks. Those are how the cards fall, and nobody gets to control that. Long term, you can be a winner regardless of the card falls…if you’re willing to learn some not-too-difficult statistics and the even less difficult concept of “pot odds.”

This is what distinguishes poker from craps, slots, roulette, and pretty much every other casino game there is. There is no long-term strategy that will allow you to win any of those other games. Period. Ignore anyone who says otherwise, cause they probably also buy Lotto tickets, have “lucky numbers” and have personally seen a ghost or possibly an alien at some point in their lives.

Stay tuned! Next post: Rocks, Sharks, Fish, Maniacs, Calling Stations, Donkeys and all the many other characters you will meet at the Texas Hold ‘Em table!

Punkass Poker

Saturday, April 19th, 2008

dog poker

I play poker. More specifically, I play (by preference) no-limit Texas Hold ‘Em. I have also been known to play limit and pot-limit Texas Hold ‘Em, Omaha Hi,
five-card draw, seven-card stud and Razz—but really, my heart belongs to no-limit Texas Hold ‘Em. (Isn’t that sweet?) S’matter of fact, I am playing it right NOW! (In the big blind with 6 4 offsuit, nobody raised, flop was 9 6 4 rainbow, sweeeeet! Gotta love those big blind specials, cause normally 6 4 regardless of suitedness makes me break out in hives, I fold that shit so fast.)

I love to talk about poker. Love, love loooooove to talk about it–I can apply it to pretty much any situation in life, get deep philosophical insights out of it, can discuss strategies and the role of pure statistical chance in the various forms of the game til the wee hours of the night, you name it! However, I’m thinking that if someone has no interest in poker, reading a blog post about it would be about as entertaining as watching paint dry. So, I am not gonna blog about it if nobody out there shares the ecstasy.

So let me know if there’s any interest! (and if I hear crickets chirping instead, I will switch back to my usual horror-tinged mockery of society, which I love ALMOST as much)

Cheers,
Lisa KS