when the status quo frustrates.

Remember the good old days, when bin Laden was one of us?

Saturday, December 8th, 2007

Tom Hanks. Julia Roberts. I figure those two would do just about any film as long as it paid well enough and gave them the contractual minimum of 3 Oscar moments*.

Aaron Sorkin. Mike Nichols. Them? Not so much. …Okay, maybe Nichols at this point, what with his late-term resume of stinkers like Regarding Henry and The Birdcage. But he’s still got some hangover cred from The Graduate, Catch-22, etc. And Sorkin’s a known lefty, not to mention a guy who felt politically competent enough to pretend on NBC that he knew how the country should be run.

Why on Earth, then, would a Sorkin script shot by Mike Nichols result in a trailer like this?

The trailer leaves us with 2 distinct possibilities:

1) It’s designed to get the war-loving rowdies into the theater and then hit them over the head with how best intentions go wrong and we always think we can control this stuff when we can’t.

2) We’re actually witnessing the impending release of a film expressing patriotic nostalgia for our bungled covert military actions that trained Osama bin Laden and eventually led to Taliban rule.

I’d say (hope?) there’s at least a 51% chance of the former. There almost has to be some “we thought we knew how to help but we didn’t” message. Except we did sort of help keep the Soviets at bay, and I’m marginally terrified the film will celebrate that. Don’t put it past citizens of the US to make a movie waxing poetic about fighting a covert war 20 years ago in a country in which we’re losing an explicit war today that nobody even remembers is going on.


Freedom Prophets

*Oscar moments are defined as “cinematic speeches and/or extended reaction shots of no less than 30 seconds in which a stiff upper lip is (barely) kept in the face of tremendous emotional stress and a swelling background orchestra.”

Not the whorification of ladyhood! Anything but that!

Wednesday, November 21st, 2007

Via Echidine & Pam, another undergrad guy lets us know what boys want, and that’s a good thing because most of us would never have guessed that the boys want us to set things up so that they may have more opportunities to act on their own Elizabeth & Mr. Darcy fantasies. Turns out, girls in boys clothes are icky, just like boys are!

Also, the Architect from the Matrix is currently residing in Texas, where he majors in history.

Dresses epitomize womanhood in the Western world. Such has been the case since the western man adopted pants to replace the tunic in the sixth century (an aspect of the West’s Germanic barbarian heritage).

Women, the more refined sex, kept the tunic-reminder of our barbarian heritage and unlike men, made it look good. Obviously. Or maybe the whole sixth century was an aspect of our barbarian heritage.

Dresses allow us to differentiate between the silhouettes of men and women on restroom signs.

Without the dress, we’d be shitting indiscriminately in any hole we could find, which is not terribly ladylike. This is the actual second sentence of the whole essay. Pause for a second to let that sink in, because it’s only gonna get better.
(more…)

Invisible histories

Tuesday, July 24th, 2007

The latest issue of This Magazine has a fantastic article on Canada’s most influential rebellions. From a list of 89, This talks about four in detail: Oka (1990), the Abortion Caravan (1970), the Ford Strike (1945), and the Fraser Canyon War (1858).

Canadian history, as taught in high schools, is intentionally dry, written with the apparent purpose of turning kids off the subject so that they won’t look into it too deeply. Where textbooks depart from the litany of Prime Ministers’ names and colonial explorations, they will mention the Red River Rebellion or devote a paragraph to “the role of women.” Labour history and civil rights struggles, beyond another paragraph on the Winnipeg General Strike, seldom gets a mention at all.

Stories like the following, about the Abortion Caravan, are never told:

Pantyhose were donned. Hair was done. Makeup was applied. More than 30 women put on the camouflage of respectability to infiltrate the House of Commons. In those innocent days before metal detectors, each carried a chain in her purse.

Ellen Woodsworth remembers how hard it was to get the chain out of her purse quietly. Once shackled to her chair, she says she looked down at all of the men in the House of Commons and was flooded with a powerful sense of her mission to raise women’s concerns.

Just before 3 p.m., one of the women stood up and started giving the group’s speech. As the guards closed in on her, another stood up in another gallery and continued. One guard told The Globe and Mail’s Clyde Sanger that the women were “popping up all over the place.” They shut down the House of Commons, and the Vancouver Sun reported it was the first adjournment provoked by a gallery disturbance in its 103-year history.

Or this one, from 1918:

Just six weeks after the Armistice was signed in 1918, a group of Canadian soldiers mobilized for battle in a brand-new arena of war: Siberia. But on the day of their departure, Quebecois conscripts in the Canadian-Siberian Expeditionary Force mutinied in Victoria, B.C. The soldiers’ resistance to fighting in Russia was reinforced by the radical elements of B.C.’s working class, which had a strong community of support for the Russian Revolution and its ideologies. It was decades before the Cold War, but already, Canada’s west was becoming the battleground for western democracy and communism.

I don’t think there’s a Canadian equivalent to Zinn’s A People’s History of the United States; there really should be. Impressive collections like this are a good start to producing an authentic and comprehensive historical narrative. Go read it!

But if we told you, it wouldn’t be a secret

Tuesday, June 26th, 2007

How exciting! The CIA has released 700 pages of “responses from CIA employees to a 1973 directive from Director of Central Intelligence James Schlesinger asking them to report activities they thought might be inconsistent with the Agency’s charter.” Thanks to the FOIA Electronic Reading Room, you can view the declassified documents from the comfort of your home or office.

Yep, here they are.

Unfortunately, this only documents the CIA’s illegal and immoral activities up to 1973—good luck finding out what they’re up to now. And the online archive is a pinnacle of bad design: The documents themselves are scanned in, and there’s no way to search them for something specific. If you want to find the bit about Castro and the Exploding Conch Shell of Death, you have to scroll through pages and pages about Russian spies and wiretapping hippies. (Auguste has one nice excerpt here. Who knew ice-making machines could be used for such nasty purposes?)

And, oh yeah. Even if you are patient, and you’re not on dial-up, and you’re really determined to know the truth, you’ll still probably be disappointed.

Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket

They blanked out all the good bits.

Spoilsports.

Blog for Choice Day, Fit the Second: Anthony Comstock, patron saint of panty-sniffing moral scolds

Monday, January 22nd, 2007

I (heart) me some birth control pill. I really do. I have to admit, I kind of fell for the scare stories about it and avoided it for a long time. I always had an excuse: I don’t see my boyfriend often enough to bother taking a pill every day, I don’t want to gain weight, I can’t afford the exam I need before they’ll write the prescription, blah blah blah.

Then I started dating my current boyfriend and heterosexual lifemate. I don’t want to brag here, but our condom expenditure was out of control. So I bit the bullet, looked up some information on the internets, went to planned parenthood, and started taking the pill.

And lo, there was light, and a heavenly chorus of angels sang the many glories of the birth control pill. None the least of which was that it made my periods bearable. What had previously been a week long hell that rendered me incapacitated for two days a month and the left me merely sickly and wallowing in what seemed like gallons of blood for another three days became a mildly uncomfortable day followed by a singularly non-alarming loss of blood.

The benefits were endless. Uninhibited sex no longer in danger of being curtailed when the Trojan box was emptied. Less pain and blood in my life. Even the enviornment is a big winner: I’ve cut my monthly maxi-pad use nearly in half, plus I used to ease the pain by taking baths so hot my skin turned grey. Now that I don’t have to do that, my hot water consumption is way down.

My life is so much better in every way since I started taking this thing, and yet, there are those who would take it from me. And from you. Pills, rings, condoms, they want it all gone.

Because they’re crazy.

Check out the fine folks at No Room for Contraception (Always Room for Love).
(more…)

Awaken, so that thy brain might fallest asleep

Wednesday, September 13th, 2006

Pretty tough talk for a guy who doesn’t go to church:

President Bush said yesterday that he senses a “Third Awakening” of religious devotion in the United States that has coincided with the nation’s struggle with international terrorists, a war that he depicted as “a confrontation between good and evil.”

Bush told a group of conservative journalists that he notices more open expressions of faith among people he meets during his travels, and he suggested that might signal a broader revival similar to other religious movements in history.

It seems that Bush’s lack of familiarity with the history of the religion he so deeply feels in the pit of his babyjesusheart has caused him to misspeak. According to most folks, there have already been at least three Awakenings, and each one was super fantastic.

I decided I would let the fundies speak for themselves by reading what they had to say about the Awakenings at Theopedia.

Awakening I: Be afraid. Be very afraid.

The First Great Awakening was a religious movement among American colonial Protestants in the 1730s and 1740s. It began with Jonathan Edwards, a Massachusetts preacher who sought to return to the Pilgrims’ strict Calvinist roots and to reawaken the fear of God.
[...]
The new style of sermons and the way people practiced their faith breathed new life into religion in America. People became passionately and emotionally involved in their religion, rather than passively listening to intellectual discourse in a detached manner.

Be afraid of teh thinkkin’, that is. Because who needs detached intellectual discourse when we can have the FEAR OF GOD instead? Sounds like a good Awakening.

(more…)

The miniseries drama continues…

Wednesday, September 6th, 2006

This morning I ran some hardcore TS Eliot smack at the NYT for “balancing” its coverage of the many failings of the new ABC 9/11 miniseries with empty retorts from the network and puff commentary on its cast.

Turns out the farcical “historic broadcast” they claim to be based primarily on the 9/11 commission report was quote the hot blogtopic today.

ThinkProgress links to Townhaller Hugh Hewitt, who received an email from an ABC Insider promising that, despite a few recent edits, “The message of the Clinton Admin failures remains fully intact.”

Pam Spaulding has the best quote about the series:

This tripe will be aired without commercials so that continuous pole-stroking can occur in Freeperland.

Crooks and Liars notes that ABC also re-opened their blog on the mini-series today. Naturally, they are “moderating” all comments (I left them a gem just to make someone read it), but many of their own quotes from the posts are priceless:

And the consensus that emerged over and over during development, production and post production is that we tried, as best we can, based on 9/11 Commission Report and numerous other sources and advisors, to present an accurate and honest account of the events leading to 9/11.

The redundant statement about Clinton and the emphasis to protect his legacy instead of trying to learn from the failures of BOTH administrations smells of “agenda”.
[...]
This is not a right wing agenda movie. The team of filmmakers, actors and executives that are responsible for this movie have very different political views. There was no emphasis given to one party over another. By the way, we are also being accused of being a left wing movie that bashes Bush.
[...]
We have worked hard to make this not a political movie. We show both administrations with an unvarnished truth.
[...]
9/ll is sacred and we must learn from the mistakes made so that it doesn’t happen again.
[...]
A quote that I really pushed to have included as the opening to the show is from the 9/11 Commission Report that states that there is recognition that with an event of this scale and complexity that we may have missed something.

Indeed. Like honesty, integrity, and basic fact.

*Bang* goes fact as the hollow men whimper about balance

Wednesday, September 6th, 2006

Good news, friends! ABC’s going to blame Clinton for 9/11.

From the NYT, via TPMI:

Days before its scheduled debut, the first major television miniseries about the Sept. 11 attacks was being criticized on Tuesday as biased and inaccurate by bloggers, terrorism experts and a member of the Sept. 11 commission, whose report makes up much of the film’s source material.

The six-hour miniseries, “The Path to 9/11,” is to be shown on ABC on Sunday and Monday. The network has been advertising the program as a “historic broadcast” that uses the commission’s report on the 2001 attacks as its “primary foundation.”

On Tuesday, several liberal blogs were questioning whether ABC’s version was overly critical of the Clinton administration while letting the Bush administration off easy.

Yes, NYT, of the 3 groups critical of the series, let’s zero in on the bloggers, because they’re not just trying to make the world listen to the voices of the

TERRORISM EXPERTS

and

9/11 COMMISSION

No, bloggers are simply drunk on zee crazy.

The Poor Man Institute adds:

And, as Jonathan Schwartz notes, ABC will be showing the $30 million series without commercials, and even giving it away for free on iTunes – forgoing any opportunity to recoup any of their money. Now, I’m no business major, but this seems like an odd way for a for-profit company to behave, particularly when compared with the similarly-controversial Fahrenheit 911, which ABC’s parent company Disney deemed too “political” to release. Huh.

Disney! If you want to know what George Bush’s ass smells like, just sniff our dick!

(more…)

Belated Monday Poetry: On Seeing Larry Rivers’ “Washington Crossing The Delaware” At The Museum Of Modern Art

Tuesday, August 8th, 2006

By Frank O’Hara
click picture to embiggen

Now that our hero has come back to us
in his white pants and we know his nose
trembling like a flag under fire,
we see the calm cold river is supporting
our forces, the beautiful history.

To be more revolutionary than a nun
is our desire, to be secular and intimate
as, when sighting a redcoat, you smile
and pull the trigger. Anxieties
and animosities, flaming and feeding

on theoretical considerations and
the jealous spiritualities of the abstract
the robot? they’re smoke, billows above
the physical event. They have burned up.
See how free we are! as a nation of persons.

Dear father of our country, so alive
you must have lied incessantly to be
immediate, here are your bones crossed
on my breast like a rusty flintlock,
a pirate’s flag, bravely specific

and ever so light in the misty glare
of a crossing by water in winter to a shore
other than that the bridge reaches for.
Don’t shoot until, the white of freedom glinting
on your gun barrel, you see the general fear.

All dark ages, all the time

Friday, August 4th, 2006

Today, DarkSyde wrote about one of my favorite subjects, the Library of Alexandria. In those hallowed halls, humans stored knowledge of the diameter of the Earth and documented theories of a heliocentric universe and worlds beyond our own. And that was all before the 5th century.

No one can say with certainty when the Library was destroyed, but DarkSyde and others subscribe to the belief that it coincided with the gruesome murder of Hypatia by Christian zealots. Whether it was razed entirely then or finished off at some other time, though, there is little doubt that, at the very least, major damage was done when Patriarchs* Theophilus and Cyril waged war upon it. The fundies in the audience can bicker over whether it was demolished or merely crippled, but the Christian assault on the library is difficult to refute historically.

[And if you try to argue Caesar destroyed it before the Christians could've gotten to it, I will point you to everybody following him who mentions its existence.]

So before 500AD, humans already knew what took us another 1000 years to rediscover (or re-admit to ourselves, at any rate): that the world is round and we orbit the sun. Back then, Christians saw these ideas as threateningly as the fundamentalists of today see evolution and other scientific advances. By actively seeking the destruction of knowledge, by gruesomely murdering brilliant teachers like Hypatia, the leaders of Christianity willfully perpetrated the dark ages on Western civilization.

If that isn’t one of the worst crimes in human history, there is no such thing as evil. DarkSyde openly wonders what would’ve become of us had we never lost this knowledge. I wonder, too. In the culture of the scholars of the Great Library, there was no deference to any specific diety; by most accounts, science and learning always came first. It doesn’t take a ridiculously creative mind to conceive of how much saner our world could be had these principles continued to take precedence.

Obviously, the Egyptians hardly had it all figured out. I’m not nostalgic for the good old days of Ptolemy II. But I do believe the West was growing in a certain direction until Christian thugs laid waste to everything that didn’t fit their worldview.

And are those actions really so different from the attitudes of today? If there was one library in the world with the only copies of the collected works on biology and evolution, don’t you think an army of acolytes would’ve destroyed it by now? It’s a darn shame Guttenberg’s printing press came to work against them in the end, what with the dastardly dissemination of so many ungodly books.

The Christians who foster misinformation about ID and zygotes and Islam are no better than the ancient fanatics who attacked the Library of Alexandria. Now, though, they lash out at colleges and academics. They work tirelessly to get ID in school and Jesus in office. They fight science, destroy choice, and wage war on intellectual curiosity. If they had their way, the fundamentalists would plunge us right back into the darkness.

It’s hardly a foregone conclusion that they’ll fail.

*You can’t make this shit up.

You forgot to pretend your totalitarian lust is patriotic, La Shawn

Wednesday, July 5th, 2006

To sniff out the mood of the country, wingnut pundits have jammed their noses in their own armpits and taken a huge whiff. Unfortunately, all they smell is the odor of imminent defeat, which is even grodier than their normal stink. The stench has either made them crazy or scared. Either way, it’s also made for some hi_lar_ious commentary.

Some have called for the reopening of the Office of Censorship. Others attempted to organize a massive NYT protest that turned out a whopping 16 people and/or simply demanded that employees of the Times be “found, tried, and executed.”

Man, are the drones getting lazy or what? If there was a button on their TV remote for “execute everyone who bugs me today” they’d pound it like an elevator was late. But it’d have to be on the remote; those bellybutton Cheetos are good for at least another hour.

Anyway, there’s also a casual call for Palestinian genocide from “The Queen of All Evil,” so named because “if conservatism is evil, she’s the queen!” [what if it's not evil? does the magic slipper fall off?], but I guess she should ask her husband if it’s the right decision because her colleagues claim women shouldn’t even be allowed to vote.

These totalitarian attitudes have always been dressed in baby-doll flag tees, but via Jill (via Atrios (via the Poor Man Institute)) we find a new low. Not even the flag or a scary picture of a muslim could save this commentary from the swastika.

Ladies and germs, La Shawn Barber:

So why are white racialists vilified? That’s easy. Because whites are seen as historically powerful oppressors. Even when their colonialism and missionary work actually improved living conditions of the conquered and the heathen, they were and are still evil in the eyes of many. They are guilty as charged forever and have no moral authority to be proud of who they are, at least not in public.

One double standard example: The anger vented against 13-year-old Lynx and Lamb Gaede of the singing group Prussian Blue, who openly express “white pride,” but not against 7-year-old Autum Ashante’ (or her father), a “black nationalist” poet.

Yeah, that colonialism sure got a bad rap. The conquered and heathen types were doomed to controlling their own destiny until white folk came along and subjugated them to better living conditions like slavery. Lord only knows how much violence and oppression they’d have faced without the white folks’ help.

(more…)

America’s one smooth criminal

Tuesday, July 4th, 2006

I’m lucky to be an American.

Whatever freedoms we’ve recently lost have never been known by most people in the world. Those qualities/beliefs/experiences for which so many Americans still face discrimination might be grounds for execution elsewhere. We have access to mountains of stuff. We are fortunate to be writing, reading, and commenting at these computers, wherever we are, and I (almost) never forget it.

But I’m not proud to be an American.

What’s so great about nationalist pride, anyway? Why is it often implied that I should worship and adore America without qualification lest I be branded a villain? This kind of zeal is no better than fundamentalist zeal; it obstructs critical thinking in all the same dangerous ways.

From the earliest age, we teach children that America is the land of freedom and opportunity, pure and untainted. Teachers present the US as the world’s enlightened protagonist. Other than brief coverage of slavery and the conditions leading up to the civil rights movement — which are treated as bizarre exceptions to the American rule — US kids gain little or no access to some of our ugly mistakes. Instead, even through high school, they are force-fed the myths that our checks always balance, our intentions are always just, and we always make room for the little guy.

It’s no wonder, then, that so many Americans patently refuse to accept we are capable of wrongdoing. Believing that the US has a painful history of fallibility can be as hard as accepting there might not be the Jesus you were always told was in your heart. Many folks won’t even entertain the discussion.

Our denial is killing our democracy.

We stuck our fingers in our ears about Florida in 2000 and Ohio in 2004. As a result, Ken Blackwell will get away with the same crimes this year.

Should we be shocked that Diebold machines will be used again this fall and almost certainly in 2008, even though a Johns Hopkins comp sci professor has analyzed the software and believes it can be rigged to favor one candidate over another? Not at all; when the Diebold CEO said before the 2004 election “I am committed to helping Ohio deliver its electoral votes to the president,” he was practically taunting Americans over their ignorance.

Of course, historically, several elections in this country have been fraudulent. But do most Americans know this? If they were presented the data, would they believe it? Nah. We’re the heroes of democratic freedom. That kind of crime happens elsewhere.

We’ve been backhanded across the face by overwhelming evidence of electoral fraud at the highest levels, and the country treats it like a delicate breeze. Consequently, it will happen again. And I cannot bring myself to be proud of it.

Our denial is killing other people.

John Jay said in Federalist No. 4:

But the safety of the people of America against dangers from foreign force depends not only on their forbearing to give just causes of war to other nations, but also on their placing and continuing themselves in such a situation as not to invite hostility or insult; for it need not be observed that there are pretended as well as just causes of war.

We have engaged ourselves in unjust war for reasons that have been proven to be pretended. We threaten Iran and North Korea with more. And while most Americans have now turned on the President for the handling of Iraq, those same people were frightenly easy to sway into supporting evil. Today the NYT implies an apology for buying in with the rest of the lot. This does not excuse their ignorance over our own history.

While we haven’t undertaken anything of Iraqi proportions in our past, a little research into American occupation of the Phillipines, or the half-dozen times we meddled in Nicaragua over the last century (including a 20-year occupation and the Contra affair we’ve already forgotten), or our ghastly coup d’etat in Guatemala might have suggested that we don’t always do the right thing abroad. Healthy suspicion and skepticism should be the calling cards of every media member. Instead, we have a fourth estate of chest-thumping patriots who still believe we are a righteous force of democracy. Maybe that’s because they’re just as brainwashed as the rest of America, or maybe that’s because they know that’s their target demographic. Either way, I cannot bring myself to be proud of it.

John Jay was right about our safety being dependent on just causes for war. By taking foreign lands for selfish reasons, we will create far more terrorism then we stop. Without just cause, we are the trespassers, and there will be many who seek retribution for our misdeeds. Our denial got us into this mess, and it’ll be responsible for future deaths abroad and at home.

We pretend not to listen when the world and its scientists tell us we are responsible for global warming. We ignore the very real need for a revamped national health care system because it’s supposedly unamerican to hand out help for free. We let companies take the freedom of the internet away from us because we’re told it’s all part of the game of American economics and politics. And we let our government spy, torture, and kill unfairly because our citizens refuse to look down at our bloody hands.

To me, pride is a response to something or someone reaching its potential, or at least trying to do so the right way. And, unfortunately, as good as it is to be an American, we have a long way to go to reach our summit. Lately, we’ve been trying to get there by moonwalking blindfolded.

Pardon me if I hide my sparkly-gloved hand in shame.