when the status quo frustrates.

Not Really

Friday, February 6th, 2009

No, I’m not making this up.

It’s been over fifteen years since I was a teenager; maybe teenagers have changed. A lot. A whole lot. Unrecognizably! Then again, I have a teenager of my own at home, and much as I myself wouldn’t have been at his same age, he would not be caught dead in one of the above t-shirts under any circumstances whatsoever. Unless he is very unrepresentative of teens everywhere, no kid noplace nohow is ever gonna wear this t-shirt. It’s bewildering that anybody would invest any money in thinking that they would.

Sometimes it’s nearly impossible to believe something is for real, isn’t it? But I trust Pam! From The Passion For Christ Movement, the folks who are bringing us the above fashion craze that is about to sweep the nation’s youth:

Most people who have engaged in masturbation know that the culmination of this sexual act ends in shame. I don’t have to share with you the thousands of emails of the admittance of this shame because you know all too well since you have experienced it yourself. Curled up in a fetal position, crying, because your bed is even more empty and you’re lonelier than you did before you violated yourself…

I don’t even know what to say about this, other than that I don’t think I’ve ever had this experience, and if I did, I would immediately check myself into the nearest mental institution.

The Evolution of A Feminist; or, Don’t Like Feminists? Stop Helping Create Them.

Friday, November 21st, 2008

(Cross-posted from Glenn’s site. Note: Feminist-friendly moderation is in effect.)

Pat Robertson said it best: “”Feminism encourages women to leave their husbands, kill their children, practice witchcraft, destroy capitalism and become lesbians.” More succinctly put, feminism is a favorite whipping girl. Feminism has become that magical word–”mainstream”–but that hasn’t made it popular or generally regarded in a positive light. And of all the folks out there that really hate feminists, men’s rights activists are probably among the most virulent and vocal about it.

The big difference between hating black people or Jews and hating feminist women–the difference espoused by people who hate the latter and not the former, say–is that black people or Jews are born that way. It isn’t a choice; being a feminist is a choice, a philosophy, not an ethnicity. Very true–but this argument leads to another, conspicuously not followed through upon by those who advocate it. As they say, feminist women are, indeed, not born feminist. But this does beg the question, doesn’t it..? –why do they become feminist?

(more…)

Um…so?

Tuesday, November 11th, 2008

USAToday:

The nation’s Catholic bishops are expected to issue a statement Wednesday pledging cooperation with president-elect Barack Obama on numerous social issues but vowing all-out opposition to any law or executive order he may sign advocating abortion rights.

Did I miss the part where America became a theocracy? Specifically a Catholic theocracy? oh, it isn’t? so, we’re supposed to care about this because..?

To Auxiliary Bishop of Chicago Thomas Paprocki, that would precipitate a cascade of disasters: It would “nullify all conscience laws” allowing doctors, nurses and others to object to abortion, and would require abortions to be performed by all hospitals — which could lead to ending obstetrics services in all Catholic hospitals, even to closing the hospitals entirely.

“Any one of us here would consider it a privilege to die tomorrow — die tomorrow! — to bring about the end of abortion,” said Auxiliary Bishop Robert Hermann of St. Louis.

No, nooo! Don’t throw us into that briar patch, Brer Fox! …er, I mean, “Yeah, don’t do that! We couldn’t stand it if any of those things happened!”

Live Commodities, Cheap and Plentiful. And There’s a Hell of a Market For Them.

Wednesday, October 15th, 2008

The opening clip in this video about made me throw up, but I still applaud the effort to shed more light on the situation. Both my significant other and I were in the military—he was actually sent to South Korea for a month when he was nineteen. He said soon after he got there, he was walking down the street and a man waved him down, hissing, “You like girls? You like?” He was a skinny, baby-faced and fairly innocent nineteen, and didn’t “get” the question; he said something like, “Well yeah, I like girls–” and the guy began offering him…girls. Not nineteen-year-old girls, eighteen-year-old girls, even fifteen- or sixteen-year-old girls, but twelve-and-under-year-old girls.

Most folks in the Army don’t want to be stationed in Asia; it’s really far from home, it’s desperately poor and depressing and the Army won’t pay for your family to come and live with you there–it’s considered “hardship duty.” However, both the S.O. and I knew cadres of guys, not nearly as small in numbers as you’d really wish they were…they volunteered for the duty. And everybody knew why, including their commanding officers. But the Army needed people to go willingly, so it was the Big Secret That Wasn’t A Secret At All, those guys’ repeated trips to the far east…why they liked so much to go.

Since then, in civillian life, I’ve periodically met in person, or been told casually in passing of, guys who take all their vacations in Thailand, or Cambodia, or Vietnam, or etc.—obsessively; they go practically nowhere else. I don’t know them or of them well enough to say anything, but I can’t help but wonder. Then I try not to think about it, because I don’t know. But I still feel sick inside, and helpless, and like I should be doing something—how can I know about this, have known about it for over a decade and not do anything?

So this is my small and completely inadequate attempt to raise awareness.

I Like Laughing

Monday, September 29th, 2008

It’s either that or crying, c’mon!

(Though in Real Life, of course, Congress did not actually go for it.)

Fallout from the Edwards Affair: Part One!

Tuesday, August 19th, 2008

Photobucket

For anyone who thinks that “feminism” as a practiced theory is narrow in either scope or defintion and that “feminists” are pretty much six-of-one-half-a-dozen-of-the-other—not even clooooose. F’rinstance, recently on our very own PunkAssBlog, one of our feminist posters (violet) told off (in a kinder and gentler fashion, of course) one of our other feminist posters (yours truly):

…I don’t think in the context of feminist blogging and critique that shaming these individuals is either valuable or appropriate…I also tend to believe there isn’t a lot of room for shaming in feminist ethical critique in general, particularly when we’re talking about women who are already shamed by society. It’s just incredibly easy for that sort of criticism to support the patriarchal narrative, even unintentionally.

I blame punkass marc, who instead of emailing me Teh Feminist Blogger Rulebook upon my acceptance of his kind invitation to become a PunkAssBlogger, just tossed off some line about “write about anything you want–I mean anything!” and then abandoned me to my own sorry devices. I hope you’re reading this, Marc, and are hanging your head in shame and possibly even sobbing into your beer ’cause this is ALL! YOUR! FAULT!

Well, til Marc gets around to setting me straight, I am just going to have to keep forging ahead into the troubled waters of feminism, blogging and morality all on my own.

(more…)

What is a Tim Blair?

Sunday, August 3rd, 2008

I read Sabotabby’s most recent post, suffered strong pangs of empathy, then moved on with life til I nipped over to Pandagon and saw that Amanda had posted on it and linked to Feministe–and also to something called a Tim Blair. Following that last link, I found a page that can be accurately summarized thusly:

!!111Girls who swear have cooties!!11111 and feminists are stupid wussies111!!11 and guys who say feminist stuff are HOMOS*******!!1111!!

Though you’d think they wouldn’t, given the level of writing talent I observed above, apparently there are people out there who actually care what this dude has to say, leading me to ascertain that he has some kind of notoriety for something. Oh, I’m so uninformed! First I don’t know who Rachel Lucas is, now I don’t know who Tim Blair is…in my defense, I do know what Bernoulli’s equations are and can even use them to design a biopharmaceutical manufacturing facility, which I bet neither Rachel Lucas nor Tim Blair can do. (If that example seems appropos of nothing, I apologize–that’s what I was doing all last week and it’s permeating my brain. Even spending the day at the pool alternately marinating in chlorine and UV rays didn’t cook it out of me.)

Wikipedia is my favorite resource for stuff that I don’t really care about to the point where a flaw in the accuracy of the material presented would break my heart but that I am at the moment interested in, so I dutifully called up the page and typed in Tim Blair and clicked Search. And there it was!

Tim Blair is a journalist, commentator and blogger working in Sydney, Australia. His columns and blog are generally written in a humorous style, from a conservative viewpoint.

Isn’t a “humorous conservative” an oxymoron? Like “compassionate conservative?” Oh, well, it got George Bush elected; I suppose the same morons who fell for the latter are ripe pickin’s for the former. To continue–

In 2004, the Sydney Morning Herald said [blah blah wrote this voted that makes money off advertising] and has also written for Fox News.

Oh well, that’s all they needed to say in the first place! Passive-aggressive venom-dripping poorly disguised lack of actual incisive analytical intellect! Now I get it. “Humorous conservative!”

Blair is particularly critical of Islamofascism

HEY, me too. And “irregardless,” and “alright,” and many others–there are almost a million words in the English language, do we have to persist in using words that don’t really exist? Hey, maybe he and I have soulmate potential after all.

That’s most of the entry, except for an additional list of people he doesn’t like, of whom I recognize only Al Gore by name, and people he does like, none of whom I recognize by name.

Well, that’s that then–classifying Tim Blair in brain under “insignificant moron, cross-ref wingnut, cross-ref misogynist subclassification smarmy” (the other subclassification is rabid in case anyone was wondering) and then moving on to actual, interesting stuff.

I’m still trying to figure out why they even bothered writing this article.

Tuesday, July 29th, 2008

Maybe I just don’t understand the definition of “news.”

Main Entry: news
Pronunciation:
\ˈnüz, ˈnyüz\
Function:
noun plural but singular in construction
Usage:
often attributive
Date:
15th century

1 a: a report of recent events
1 b: previously unknown information
2 a: material reported in a newspaper or news periodical or on a newscast
2 b: matter that is newsworthy

I think my problem is that I tend to expect the “news” to be skewed a lot more heavily towards being 1b and 2b above, rather than 1a and 2a. Clearly having expectations is my problem!

Analysis: Obama, McCain both have lobbyist ties

How astonishing in United States senators running for President. Really! (snork!)

During this campaign, lobbyists and trade groups donated $181,000 to McCain, while Obama received $6,000, according to the New York Times.

You know, $6,000 doesn’t look too shocking when it’s sitting next to $181,000.

In all, lobbyists reported contributions of $4.7 million to Democrats and $3.3 million to Republicans, the Times reported this week.

So are we supposed to adjust each candidate’s actual numbers by some kind of percentage based on party affiliation..? If not, I’m not clear on what that snippet is doing in this article at all, purportedly specifically targeting Obama and McCain as individuals.

Still, both candidates maintain they are above the influence of lobbyists.

$181,000 is being above the influence? $6,000, maybe, but–?

The senator from Illinois also has taken in $18.8 million from lawyers and law firms, according to estimates from the Center for Responsive Politics, and some of those firms employ lobbyists for special interest clients.

Gosh, this reminds me of studying logic in high school. Let’s see how it works out!

Obama = A
money = B
laywers and law firms = C
lobbyists = D

Given facts:

A takes B from C.
C gives B to D.

..um, there is no way to link A to D there..?

“People who are not directly registered as lobbyists but perhaps working for a company, maybe working for a company in a capacity that’s tangentially related to the government affairs, can give money,” said Lisa Lerer, who covers lobbying for Politico.

I work for a company in a capacity that’s tangentially related to government affairs. Oh, wow, I’m like a LOBBYIST!

The rest the article is much the same, a whole lot of confused and impossible-to-substantiate inferences that contradict each other, though it is hard to avoid that if either candidate IS somehow tied at the hip to the lobbyist racket, it ain’t Obama.

Do they seriously get paid for this crap? Like, more than minimum wage..? If so, I’m clearly in the wrong business.

“Ilk!”

Thursday, July 10th, 2008

I’ve always yearned to be “ilk!”

Of course, I may be flattering myself. When the Lady Lydia referred to persons of “Kyso’s ilk,” she may not have been referring to me because she didn’t specify what Kysoean attributes a person must have to be considered one of “Kyso’s ilk.”

(I’m sorry for the incessant quotation marks, but since the Lyds used ‘em, I feel I must faithfully reproduce them. It would be wrong to assume that she simply isn’t aware of the proper usage of quotation marks. Wrong, I tell you.)

Who is this “Lady Lydia” broad, you may ask? (Well, you might already know. That was what I was wondering when I was nipping merrily through the site today and noticed somebody was leaving comments on a post that was two years old. I mean, it takes some dedication to read through two years of blog archives!)

Well, as it turns out, the simpler explanation is usually the correct one…nope, the Lyds didn’t actually just happen across the awesomeness that is PunkAssBlog and was so enchanted by the content therein that she spent the past week reading post after post in reverse chronological order til she accidentally encountered one that was actually about her. No, she was LOOKING for it! (Excuse me, them. There are two of them.) But still, two years later..? I smelled a Mystery! Happily, she very thoughtfully embedded her url in her username, so my investigation got off to a swimming start.

As it turns out, the Lyds is deeply into women doing nothing but homemaking. She tacitly admits that homemaking with all the modern conveniences out there is a grotesque bore, so she is also deeply into all the crap women used to have to do by hand, from scratch, in order to homemake. I can sorta understand this as a consuming hobby. It doesn’t move me personally, but then, neither does skydiving and I know at least two people who are totally into that. Diff’rent strokes for diff’rent folks. The only really bizarre aspect of her hobbyist obsession is that she appears to believe that all women should also devote themselves to her particular hobby, full-time, at the expense of a paying job. (And as a corollary, I guess she thinks men should be really excited to get to work full-time to completely financially support not only any woman who wants to entirely devote herself to this hobby, but all the hobby materials as well, plus a house with land suitable for planting to go with it.)

I’ve known lots of people with hobbies, some of ‘em dead crazy about ‘em. But I haven’t ever met anyone who thought that they should get to quit their job and somebody else should support them so they could pursue it full-time–and then wanted the entire world to follow suit. That’s just…wow. Words escape me.

I flicked through the sidebar as the Lyds recommended (some gorgeous examples of who she admires sufficiently to link to will be provided at the end of this post) and then scanned down her main page. And woot! I FOUND it! the answer to the Mystery of What She Was Doing Commenting On a Two-Year-Old Post by Kyso: an article entitled Silly Women, which she opens by saying that someone alerted her to a blog where she’s the main topic.

(Two two-year-old posts about her means she’s our blog’s main topic?)

Anyway, she spends the entire article attempting to simultaneously appear to turn the other cheek in a humble and ladylike fashion as laid out in the Bible when someone in particular has infuriated her, while squeezing out insults aimed at pointedly nameless silly women so that she doesn’t actually have to eat her own bile in silence in a humble and ladylike fashion as laid out in the Bible. This is otherwise known as passive aggression, and is a tactic not infrequently resorted to by women who find (or put) themselves in the Lyd’s domestic situation. Sad but true.

Now that we’ve pretty much explored her one dimension, let’s briefly turn to some quotes from the collection of links on her page that she labels ESPECIALLY FOR FEMINISTS for some fun quotes that support her oft-stated and obviously very important-to-her goal of KEEPING BLOGS LOVELY!

Might I remind you ladies, that it was the WASP’s and other races of Christian men, that treated you better than any civilization has treated you on the planet. First, they allowed you to sit at the table and eat with the men.

Perhaps you ask, “Don’t I have any rights as a wife? Am I just to be a plain old slave all my days?” Listen carefully now….You don’t have any rights, no rights at all.

“Slovenly” “Drab” Unkempt” “Slatternly” “Blowzy” –many adjectives come to mind to describe most women who wear jeans.

Oh, the tranquil beauty of these sites soothes my troubled soul!

When The Only Moral Abortion Is My Abortion

Saturday, June 28th, 2008

In honor of congressional candidate Mike Erickson, I thought I’d recycle this oldie-but-goodie–always worth a read!

When the Anti-Choice Choose
By Joyce Arthur

My three favorites:

“I’ve had several cases over the years in which the anti-abortion patient had rationalized in one way or another that her case was the only exception, but the one that really made an impression was the college senior who was the president of her campus Right-to-Life organization, meaning that she had worked very hard in that organization for several years. As I was completing her procedure, I asked what she planned to do about her high office in the RTL organization. Her response was a wide-eyed, ‘You’re not going to tell them, are you!?’ When assured that I was not, she breathed a sigh of relief, explaining how important that position was to her and how she wouldn’t want this to interfere with it.” (Physician, Texas)

“In 1990, in the Boston area, Operation Rescue and other groups were regularly blockading the clinics, and many of us went every Saturday morning for months to help women and staff get in. As a result, we knew many of the ‘antis’ by face. One morning, a woman who had been a regular ‘sidewalk counselor’ went into the clinic with a young woman who looked like she was 16-17, and obviously her daughter. When the mother came out about an hour later, I had to go up and ask her if her daughter’s situation had caused her to change her mind. ‘I don’t expect you to understand my daughter’s situation!’ she angrily replied. The following Saturday, she was back, pleading with women entering the clinic not to ‘murder their babies.’” (Clinic escort, Massachusetts)

“My first encounter with this phenomenon came when I was doing a 2-week follow-up at a family planning clinic. The woman’s anti-choice values spoke indirectly through her expression and body language. She told me that she had been offended by the other women in the abortion clinic waiting room because they were using abortion as a form of birth control, but her condom had broken so she had no choice! I had real difficulty not pointing out that she did have a choice, and she had made it! Just like the other women in the waiting room.” (Physician, Ontario)

You can read the entire article here.

I Really Think The Federal Government Should Be Subsidizing This

Sunday, June 22nd, 2008

Photobucket
“My administration will give unprecedented support to strengthening marriages. Many good programs help couples who want to get married and stay married.” -President Bush

Apparently there’s money for it. See?

So all I need to do is write up my grant proposal! I’m conducting the efficacy study right now.

First we created our characters…together. (oh sigh!)

Photobucket

Then we began questing…as a team!

We bonded over Midsummer Festival Flame dancing:

Photobucket

By the end of the night, waiting in the Deeprun Tram station, we were exhausted but absolutely inseparable.

Photobucket

Our relationship has a new strength, a new thrill, a new depth, a new joy. For only $14.99 a month.

Top that, Lehigh Valley Healthy Marriage Coalition (LHMC), Community Services for Children (CSC) (Allentown, PA)!

Somebody Stop Me!

Thursday, June 19th, 2008

I live right on the commuter train line to DC. Seriously. It would cost me less than ten bucks to attend this thing AND in an environmentally-friendly fashion too! (Okay, plus $95 for the ticket, but still! CHEAP!)

For $95, they do emphasize a refusal to feed you, but you get to call yourself a “Value Voter” and you purchase the package NAMED AFTER YOU that includes both briefing and exhibit passes. Also, I absolutely loved their description of their exhibitors, which I have expanded upon only slightly below as a total favor to them ’cause I thought they were just being too politically correct in their phraseology and I know that these are the folks who would never, EVER want to be politically correct:

Join with other pro-family anti-birth control conservative organizations from across the country and reach an audience of grassroots activists who believe in traditional marriage gay-bashing, the protection of our religious freedoms forcing Fundamentalist Christianity into public schools, defending the sanctity of life prior to birth and after brain death has occurred but not at any other time, protecting preventing the brown tide from sweeping across our borders and defending our homeland pumping even more tax dollars and young socioeconomically disadvantaged lives into Iraq.

This year’s speakers include:

Carol Franz, Adult Stem Cell Transplant Survivor*
Newt Gingrich, Who Has No Descriptive Tag After His Name
Star Parker, Author and Speaker
Phyllis Schlafly, Founder of Eagle Forum
Michael Steele, Chairman of GOPAC and ex-Lt Gov. of Maryland

and oh, so MANY MORE!

Last year they had Senator John McCain as a speaker. Imagine! They’ve invited him this year too but apparently he has not yet accepted. How astonishing!

(Via.)

*Not a descriptor I’ve actually ever encountered before.