when the status quo frustrates.

Things That Are Different and Things That Are the Same

The wild-eyed woman-hating that apparently characterized this year’s crop of Superbowl ads got me thinking–what do people who make a point of denying that wild-eyed woman-hating really exists in America have to say about it..? Nothing, as far as I could tell–and I don’t blame them; there isn’t much they could say, though I speculated that maybe one or two would capitalize on it as a much-needed backlash against all dem bitchez! or possibly note that the characterization of men as mindless Neanderthals that frequently accompanies ads denigrating women is pretty insulting to men, too.

But in the midst of my aimless perusal of Men’s Rights-type sites, I stumbled across this article: 10 Lies Men Tell Themselves in Order to Stay in Abusive Relationships with their Wives or Girlfriends. I was struck by how very many of the Lies Men Tell Themselves appeared to be very similar, if not identical, to the Lies Women Tell Themselves in Order to Stay In Abusive Relationships. Perhaps not a dazzling revelation–abuse is abuse, regardless of the demographics of the abuser and abusee–but then, that’s also too simplistic of a statement to make. Some forms of abuse really don’t happen much without pre-existing factors that facilitate them; for example, while both parent-on-child and child-on-parent physical abuse does occur, it occurs far more often in the former case due to size disparity, economic imbalance, psychological dominance overwhelmingly in favor of the parent, etc. etc.

So I Googled a list for women and thought I’d look at them together, and see what similarities and differences did crop up in your typical Top Ten Lies list.

Reasons that are identical for both genders

1. I’ll lose my home, my kids and my money and assets.
2. Love conquers all.
3. Even living in a relationship without sex or affection is better than being alone.

Not very surprising. For number 1, what you are more likely to lose more of from that list can be influenced by your specific gender, but regardless of your gender the unpleasant reality is that if you leave an abusive partner, you are going to lose at least some of one or more of those things.

For number 2, self-delusion is hardly gender-specific, and our culture h-e-a-v-i-l-y romanticizes and encourages this particular point of view.

I’ll be honest and say that I don’t understand number 3 at all, but I know that a huge number of people do feel that way. I find it far worse to be lonely in the same room with someone than be lonely when I’m actually alone in the room; having someone there that’s supposed to love and desire you but doesn’t is the most miserable tease in the world.

Reasons that are similar for both genders

1. Male version:I made a commitment and I honor my commitments.
Female version:It is my duty to make my relationship work.

2. Male version:If I just work a little harder at the relationship, it will get better.
Female version:He can change if I’m just committed enough.

3.Male version:My kid(s) are okay because she doesn’t yell at them.
Female version:I need to keep our family together for the children’s sake.

The differences are not large in each statement–they are interesting in the ways each illustrates the culturally ingrained male/female mindsets, but the central theme in each is the same. For number 1, domestic harmony is a woman’s responsibility and domestic prosperity is a man’s (of course I don’t agree with that, duh! but that is the prevailing meme). But the central theme of a reluctance to fail in one’s life-role responsibilities crosses the gender line.

For number 2, the interesting part is that both genders see the man as the active partner and the woman as the passive partner–the man must work harder on his actions/ the woman must stand back and allow the man time and space to work harder on his actions. Both, of course, are mistaken for the same reason–the abusive person is not abusive because of anything you are doing, not because you are either not doing enough or doing too much.

For number 3, both sexes view the children and mother as an inseparable unit; for the man, that she abuses him has nothing to do with their children, and for the woman, that if she leaves him their children will automatically lose their father. The central fallacy is that it’s better for children to grow up in a home where one parent abuses another than to grow up with two divorced parents–this unfortunate notion, even after being pretty thoroughly debunked in recent times, continues to persist in our culture.

Reasons that are the same thematically, but the angle of approach is 180 degrees opposite for the genders:

Male version: I’m strong. I can take the abuse, and The abuse is not that bad.
Female version:He may seriously injure me or kill me if I try to leave.

I think the reason behind this one is that men are on average taller, heavier, stronger and faster than women. Men simply aren’t as likely to fear severe physical damage at the hands of a woman, and also are far less likely to actually experience severe physical damage at the hands of a woman–even those who argue over the gender-based incidence of physical abuse in relationships don’t argue that when it does occur, the woman is far more likely to end up really hurt–and in terms of domestic murders, the number of women done in by their current or previous man far, far exceeds the opposite dynamic. And of course, men are socialized to trivialize physical violence committed against themselves, whereas women are socialized to disproportionately fear it.

Reasons that are really gender-specific, with no opposite-sex analogue:

Male: All relationships have conflict. Conflict is healthy.

Female I’m so awful that nobody else will ever want me; I may even deserve this.

This is a total guess, since I was surprised to see this on the list at all given the prevailing cliche that men are deeply allergic to drama in their romantic relationships with women–but if this is truly a common male justification, I would think that perhaps men are more likely to regard a certain amount of conflict as normal because it characterizes so much more of their everyday interactions with everyone else. If you’ve ever spent any time around heavy-majority male groups, you know that there is a lot of posturing, challenging, insulting and so forth that goes on as a routine activity. Men are accustomed to fairly open fighting for their place in the hierarchy of whatever unit they happen to be in, so when it happens at home, I’m guessing they’re not as horrified as your average woman, nor as immediately convinced that it’s a sign of a serious problem.

For women, it does indeed often boil down to self-esteem issues. Women definitely have a tendency to rate themselves internally based on what the men in their life think of them–I’ve done it too often myself subconsciously (and it’s an unpleasant realization when it finally surfaces to the conscious level that that IS what you’re doing) to be able to pooh-pooh it away. Men don’t seem to have such a problem with internalizing things like this, with the glaring exception of personal sexual ability.

Anybody else have any thoughts about all this..?

17 Responses to “Things That Are Different and Things That Are the Same”

  1. N. L. says:

    you’re wrong about the relative murder rate men v. women. For one thing, when a woman murders her husband it is usually via friend or lover, and the DOJ counts that aa ‘multi-offender’ killing, not spousal murder. The stats are misleading. Also women more frequently kill by poisoning, which does not always get included.

    Warren Farrell (Myth of Male Power) takes these and several other factors into consideration and concludes that the murder rate is actually higher for women.

  2. N. L. says:

    to tell you the truth, some of what you’re proposing in your article amounts to nothing more than intellectualized pop psychology.

  3. Lisa Kansas says:

    ::shrug:: This is a blog; I’m an engineer, not a psychologist or sociologist.. For what it’s worth, I ran it past three or four guys I know to see what they thought of my reasoning–but still, it’s a blog. :) Take it or leave it. And it’s, er, so lovely to see an MRA again on here after so long…but I will warn you, if you’re going to make statistical assertions like the ones in the first comment you left, you’re going to have to link or post actual corroborating evidence of them as was done in the blog itself, or they’ll probably be ignored.

  4. Dr. Psycho says:

    Are you seriously saying that no woman ever says, “All relationships have conflict. Conflict is healthy”, and that no man ever says “I’m so awful that nobody else will ever want me; I may even deserve this”?

    I kind of think that actually does happen.

  5. Lisa Kansas says:

    If you read the blog post, you will see pretty clearly that no, I didn’t say that no woman ever says X and no man ever says Y. Why you want to make me requote something that is like right there 4 inches up the page I dunno, but here goes. :)

    I stumbled across this article: 10 Lies Men Tell Themselves in Order to Stay in Abusive Relationships with their Wives or Girlfriends.

    I Googled a list for women and thought I’d look at them together, and see what similarities and differences did crop up in your typical Ten Lies list.

    Reasons given in the lists that were really gender-specific, with no opposite-sex analogue given in the list:

    Male: All relationships have conflict. Conflict is healthy.

    Female I’m so awful that nobody else will ever want me; I may even deserve this.

    There ya go: What I said.

  6. Joshua Rupp says:

    There’s a fetishism for the “feisty” female in certain circles of our culture, as well. It’s condescending, yes, but the spectacle of women going against gender stereotypes is still considered more cute than normal. I mean, we still are making movies where it’s considered ironically funny to portray a woman as a physicist, or a ninja. (Which, combined, would actually be a cool movie, but I digress.) One problem with this institutionalized condescension is that a woman doing anything up to and including taking a chainsaw to the neighbor’s poodles is considered endearingly tomboyish. To that mindset, violence isn’t a universal thing that anybody can do, but a gender-specific right of passage. Within this circle, I don’t think they believe that it is possible for women to abuse men, only for women to get in a lucky shot. Being BEATEN is not the same thing as being ABUSED.

  7. Joshua Rupp says:

    I mean, I say this for the sake of argument, since it’s obviously men who are doing the bulk of the walloping. But I think that many men have culturally-created psychological barriers that insist that there are ways you cannot be hurt. Even if you can.

  8. N. L. says:

    so look it up in Farrell…what’s the problem?? (Hint: The book has an index. Hint #2: if you don’t want to buy it, stand in Borders and look at it.)

  9. N. L. says:

    sorry josh, you’re wrong. Google on “martin fiebert”. (And beware of stuff that’s obvious.)

  10. N. L. says:

    Male: All relationships have conflict. Conflict is healthy.

    Female I’m so awful that nobody else will ever want me; I may even deserve this.

    If this is true, then you women need to work on getting your act together. Your problem is not caused by men. As Hannibal Lecter said, “Look within YOURself”

  11. Lisa Kansas says:

    LOL, dude, it’s not my job to research your claims! It’s your job as a commenter on someone else’s site to provide your own corroborating evidence. Sorry. Future comments by you will either be deleted or, if I’m feeling creative, replaced by a Hypnotoad video, if you continue in this vein. Life is too short and too important to waste on nutjobs.

  12. Antigone says:

    If this is true, then you women need to work on getting your act together. Your problem is not caused by men. As Hannibal Lecter said, “Look within YOURself”

    Shorter troll: When I kept telling you over and over that you were worthless, you weren’t supposed to BELIEVE it.

    I fully support this banning program.

  13. Joshua Rupp says:

    N.L:

    His site has a line about “supporting beings of cosmic light,” which makes the cuckoo clock noise go off in my head. It doesn’t matter, though, because it’s all a moot point. I’m not sure what saying, “Women hit men, too” is supposed to prove. I mean, so? We all agree that it’s bad to hit people, right? You’re not arguing that assault is okay. So, let’s just agree that if you beat someone up, you’ve committed a crime. I have no idea what the statistics of women assaulting men is, but it’s pretty clear that it’s men who seriously hurt more women, so our starting point is pretty clear.

  14. Joshua Rupp says:

    P.S.

    I’m not sure quoting Hannibal Lecter is a good idea. He was … you know … a pretty bad psychologist.

  15. Lisa Kansas says:

    Not to mention a fictional character…I think this is pretty fun, because this post is not only doesn’t claim men aren’t abused by women, it specifically talks about the thought processes men go through that lead them to stay with abusive women. This gives our troll not much to work with, but he’s clearly doing his best to find s-o-m-e-t-h-i-n-g to be massively MRA-offended about. :D

  16. Joshua Rupp says:

    Personally, I blame the outbreak of Amazon cannibal dominatrixes. It has all the dudes on edge.

  17. violet says:

    I’m not sure quoting Hannibal Lecter is a good idea. He was … you know … a pretty bad psychologist.

    Excellent cook, though.

Leave a Reply