<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Defense of ReGifting</title>
	<atom:link href="http://punkassblog.com/2009/12/10/in-defense-of-regifting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://punkassblog.com/2009/12/10/in-defense-of-regifting/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 04:59:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Planting Potatoes</title>
		<link>http://punkassblog.com/2009/12/10/in-defense-of-regifting/comment-page-1/#comment-564993</link>
		<dc:creator>Planting Potatoes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 21:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punkassblog.com/?p=4698#comment-564993</guid>
		<description>Nice read.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice read.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dana</title>
		<link>http://punkassblog.com/2009/12/10/in-defense-of-regifting/comment-page-1/#comment-534809</link>
		<dc:creator>Dana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Dec 2009 23:14:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punkassblog.com/?p=4698#comment-534809</guid>
		<description>Well, according to the first chapter of &lt;i&gt;fellowship of the Ring&lt;/i&gt;, regifting is a long and well established tradition in the Shire.  That ought to be good enough for you!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, according to the first chapter of <i>fellowship of the Ring</i>, regifting is a long and well established tradition in the Shire.  That ought to be good enough for you!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew F</title>
		<link>http://punkassblog.com/2009/12/10/in-defense-of-regifting/comment-page-1/#comment-528726</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 20:59:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punkassblog.com/?p=4698#comment-528726</guid>
		<description>I suppose to some extent it would. But it&#039;s the thought that counts. 

I&#039;m not saying I have anything against regifting as Antigone describes it, I just don&#039;t think the stigma is wholly commercialist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I suppose to some extent it would. But it&#8217;s the thought that counts. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying I have anything against regifting as Antigone describes it, I just don&#8217;t think the stigma is wholly commercialist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shiyiya</title>
		<link>http://punkassblog.com/2009/12/10/in-defense-of-regifting/comment-page-1/#comment-528518</link>
		<dc:creator>Shiyiya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Dec 2009 10:44:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punkassblog.com/?p=4698#comment-528518</guid>
		<description>But what if it&#039;s something you don&#039;t want and you&#039;re giviing it to someone who really would? That seems to fall within your definition, Andrew.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But what if it&#8217;s something you don&#8217;t want and you&#8217;re giviing it to someone who really would? That seems to fall within your definition, Andrew.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew F</title>
		<link>http://punkassblog.com/2009/12/10/in-defense-of-regifting/comment-page-1/#comment-528278</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew F</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 18:55:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punkassblog.com/?p=4698#comment-528278</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think it&#039;s just about a stigma against second-hand. Regifting as I know it is when you use it as an excuse to get rid of something without throwing it away. I&#039;m thinking of the useless shiny or the horrible soap set you received one year and pass on the next. It&#039;s when giving is more about clearing out than what the recipient might like.

We once won a garden gnome in a raffle, and were going to donate it to another raffle. That sort of thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s just about a stigma against second-hand. Regifting as I know it is when you use it as an excuse to get rid of something without throwing it away. I&#8217;m thinking of the useless shiny or the horrible soap set you received one year and pass on the next. It&#8217;s when giving is more about clearing out than what the recipient might like.</p>
<p>We once won a garden gnome in a raffle, and were going to donate it to another raffle. That sort of thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katrina</title>
		<link>http://punkassblog.com/2009/12/10/in-defense-of-regifting/comment-page-1/#comment-527809</link>
		<dc:creator>Katrina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 14:56:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punkassblog.com/?p=4698#comment-527809</guid>
		<description>I agree with you on the whole, but I know lots of people (family, mainly) who don&#039;t like buying gifts, and are ashamed to admit it. This leads to some pretty strange behaviour on their part. 
I&#039;d really prefer no gifts and no lies or guilt or complaints about how expensive it was. I don&#039;t mind getting gifts that obviously cost $2, but I mind getting a hastily wrapped teddy bear (I&#039;m 38) from my sister the day after giving her child a present.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you on the whole, but I know lots of people (family, mainly) who don&#8217;t like buying gifts, and are ashamed to admit it. This leads to some pretty strange behaviour on their part.<br />
I&#8217;d really prefer no gifts and no lies or guilt or complaints about how expensive it was. I don&#8217;t mind getting gifts that obviously cost $2, but I mind getting a hastily wrapped teddy bear (I&#8217;m 38) from my sister the day after giving her child a present.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thene</title>
		<link>http://punkassblog.com/2009/12/10/in-defense-of-regifting/comment-page-1/#comment-526475</link>
		<dc:creator>Thene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 05:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punkassblog.com/?p=4698#comment-526475</guid>
		<description>...but NO, Antigone, don&#039;t you know that the content of a book degrades every time it&#039;s seen by a new pair of eyes?

Oh shit, two people have commented on this post before me.  That means I wasn&#039;t the first person to read it.  I need to go wash my keyboard now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;but NO, Antigone, don&#8217;t you know that the content of a book degrades every time it&#8217;s seen by a new pair of eyes?</p>
<p>Oh shit, two people have commented on this post before me.  That means I wasn&#8217;t the first person to read it.  I need to go wash my keyboard now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ACW</title>
		<link>http://punkassblog.com/2009/12/10/in-defense-of-regifting/comment-page-1/#comment-526423</link>
		<dc:creator>ACW</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 02:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punkassblog.com/?p=4698#comment-526423</guid>
		<description>I fully support regifting.  
Have you ever seen a live production of &#039;Anne Frank&#039;?  Miep shows up with used items bundled in cloth and tied with string or ribbon (because wrapping paper is wasteful/unavailable), and the families are ecstatic.  It&#039;s easy to adjust your mindset and understand that an item isn&#039;t unworthy of gratitude just because someone has licked all the new off it.
Similarly, how can anyone think of reusing or repurposing without &#039;Brave New World&#039; coming to mind?  Here, an author has directly pointed out our wastefulness, and yet our society continues to practice &quot;ending&quot; rather than &quot;mending&quot;.  
That said... some items are more appropriate for regifting...  books being  highest on the list.  I wouldn&#039;t, for instance, regift someone with a pair of my skivvies.  lol
Excellent post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fully support regifting.<br />
Have you ever seen a live production of &#8216;Anne Frank&#8217;?  Miep shows up with used items bundled in cloth and tied with string or ribbon (because wrapping paper is wasteful/unavailable), and the families are ecstatic.  It&#8217;s easy to adjust your mindset and understand that an item isn&#8217;t unworthy of gratitude just because someone has licked all the new off it.<br />
Similarly, how can anyone think of reusing or repurposing without &#8216;Brave New World&#8217; coming to mind?  Here, an author has directly pointed out our wastefulness, and yet our society continues to practice &#8220;ending&#8221; rather than &#8220;mending&#8221;.<br />
That said&#8230; some items are more appropriate for regifting&#8230;  books being  highest on the list.  I wouldn&#8217;t, for instance, regift someone with a pair of my skivvies.  lol<br />
Excellent post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lauren</title>
		<link>http://punkassblog.com/2009/12/10/in-defense-of-regifting/comment-page-1/#comment-526421</link>
		<dc:creator>Lauren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 02:21:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punkassblog.com/?p=4698#comment-526421</guid>
		<description>You might enjoy &lt;a href=&quot;http://regiftingrevival.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this site/book&lt;/a&gt; about regifting! Okay, well, maybe not the site, it&#039;s sort of ugly. Worth a look, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You might enjoy <a href="http://regiftingrevival.com/" rel="nofollow">this site/book</a> about regifting! Okay, well, maybe not the site, it&#8217;s sort of ugly. Worth a look, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

