So Douchebag Prager wrote “Part 2.” Hard as I’m trying not to contemplate him in even the remotest sexual fashion, I can’t help but wonder: is he really as terrible in the sack as this article makes him sound..? (Can anyone be? And if someone was, should he really be making it so publicly clear as this..?) Jesse’s blog on this is hilarious and definitely hits all the fine points, happily saving me from having to generate a detailed analysis of something that is genuinely grossing me out. Yep, it’s even worse than “Part 1″ was.
There was so much wrong in that article that even though almost every comment on those threads contributed to the list of wrong to be found we still didn’t touch my favorite sentence:
Historical denigration of women’s worth since the 1960’s? Really, Dennis? Really?!?!
I started reading the article aloud to my husband–when I got to the part about “But for most women, for myriad reasons—female nature, childhood trauma, not feeling sexy, being preoccupied with some problem, fatigue after a day with the children and/or other work, just not being interested—” he shrieked, “Oh my God, stop reading it, PLEASE!”
Since you mentioned that paragraph, we are also required to give kudos to whatever Pandagon commenter who noticed that Dennis was lumping “Not now, I’m bloated from Taco Bell” equal weight with “I don’t want to because it’s too much like how Daddy wronged me.” Bloat, sexual trauma, either way, Prager ain’t getting any so whatever the problem is bitch, solve it.
I like how he takes his usual smack at educated women. Prager just hates that women have had the temerity to take themselves off to school. Back in the kitchen, girls!
I’m quite fond of the phrase “obligation in personal relations”. Isn’t the point of personal relations (of ANY flavor, really) that you WANT to, not that you HAVE to? The people I see on a day to day basis because I HAVE to I generally call Co-Workers, and I’m getting compensated 6.55 per hour plus tips to put up with their redneck alcoholic asses.
TRH