when the status quo frustrates.

UPDATED! To Cross-Post, or Not to Cross-Post? that is the question.

I just submitted my second article to Glenn Sacks for his “Feminist Dissident” feature–it’ll probably take him a few days to get it posted, so don’t run over looking for it now. What I was wondering, though, was if anybody is interested in seeing it (and future submissions) up here at PAB? I have no preference either way, so just let me know if you do!

UPDATE: Glenn and I talked on the phone and I agreed to not cross-post the article in its entirety over here–I will put up a new post when the article pops up on Glenn’s site with a brief summary as to topic and a link here. Also–I suspect Faith may not be the only one who might like to discuss the article without having to wade through a multiplicity of anti-feminist rhetoric and the periodic “women are giant oozing boogers” statements–so, if you’d like to explore the article’s topic from a feminist-friendly perspective, I can heavily moderate the comments on the article thread here at PAB to keep it that way. Let me know what you’d like to see!

12 Responses to “UPDATED! To Cross-Post, or Not to Cross-Post? that is the question.”

  1. mustelid says:

    Yes, please to cross-posting!

  2. Danny says:

    Yes Yes Yes! Cross posting is good.

  3. paleandnerdy says:

    Yes please crosspost, or at least leave a link.

  4. Faith says:

    Yes, please….I’d much appreciate a cross-post to spare my eyes (and my blood pressure) from having to view Glenn Sack’s blog should I want to read your post…and I very much do.

  5. Hari says:

    “Yes, please….I’d much appreciate a cross-post to spare my eyes (and my blood pressure) from having to view Glenn Sack’s blog should I want to read your post…and I very much do.”

    Somebody get her a fainting couch.

  6. Lisa Kansas says:

    ::bump!:: Glenn’s probably going to publish the article tomorrow, so weigh in soon! :)

  7. violet says:

    Cross-posting and heavy moderation of the shadow threads here would be great (I can help with the latter, if you want). I’m interested in the kinda meta-discussion about the development and advocacy of feminist worldviews. I don’t think that discussion can happen with some jackass running around the thread, yelling that feminists want to cause the death of civilization.

  8. Lisa KS says:

    Actually, vi, that would be a big help if you could help moderate! :) that’s what we’ll do then…

  9. Faith says:

    “Somebody get her a fainting couch.”

    Oh, please do!! I always wanted one of those!! There’s a local antique shop near my house which has an awesome one that I want for 2,000 bucks.

    Care to make a donation?

  10. Faith says:

    “so, if you’d like to explore the article’s topic from a feminist-friendly perspective, I can heavily moderate the comments on the article thread here at PAB to keep it that way. Let me know what you’d like to see!”

    Sounds good to me. I’m not sure I understand why you can’t post the article in its entirety here on your blog, but it isn’t really any of my business either if you don’t wish to explain.

  11. thebigmanfred says:

    I agree that having a discussion here with more moderation would be useful, as Glenn’s moderation policy is pretty loose.

  12. Mjaybee says:

    Good for you for taking Glenn up on his offer.

Leave a Reply