when the status quo frustrates.

OH MY god, he did NOT actually say that–

Saturday, September 20th, 2008

He did, he did!

McCain Health-Care Article Fuels New Clash Over Economy

The article, which appeared under McCain’s name, was published in Contingencies magazine, which is produced under the auspices of the American Association of Actuaries. In it, McCain touted his plans for increasing competition in health care as one way to expand coverage and reduce costs.

McCain wrote, “Opening up the health insurance market to more vigorous nationwide competition, as we have done over the last decade in banking, would provide more choices of innovative products less burdened by the worst excesses of state-based regulation.”

BWAHAHAHAHAHA!

That is all.

Guardian Angels Are Here, Say Most Americans

Saturday, September 20th, 2008

I found I couldn’t improve on that title.

More than half of all Americans believe they have been helped by a guardian angel in the course of their lives, according to a new poll by the Baylor University Institute for Studies of Religion. In a poll of 1700 respondents, 55% answered affirmatively to the statement, “I was protected from harm by a guardian angel.” The responses defied standard class and denominational assumptions about religious belief; the majority held up regardless of denomination, region or education — though the figure was a little lower

Yeah, by like almost half.

(37%) among respondents earning more than $150,000 a year.

Apparently their angels look a little more like this:

In the case of angels, however, the question is a little stronger than just belief. Says [Christopher] Bader [director of the Baylor survey], “If you ask whether people believe in guardian angels, a lot of people will say, ‘sure.’ But this is different. It’s experiential. It means that lots of Americans are having these lived supernatural experiences.”

I’m hoping it’s just residual from hormonal contraceptives in the water. I figure if that’s all it takes to cause whole colonies of boy frogs to spontaneously change into girl frogs, surely it can manage to induce periodic wish-fullfilment hallucinations in tens of millions of Americans!

The Baylor study tested other statements that might indicate a similar belief in the supernatural intruding into everyday personal experience — “I heard the voice of God speaking to me”; and “I received a miraculous physical healing.” But far fewer people claimed to have had those experiences.

Randall Balmer, chairman of the religion department at New York’s Barnard College, says that the Baylor angel figures are one in a periodic series of indications that “Americans live in an enchanted world,” and engage in a kind of casual mysticism independent of established religious ritual, doctrine or theology. “There is,” he says, a “much broader uncharted range of religious experience among the populace than we expect.”

Oh, my. That’s perilously close to stating that all organized religion is, is opportunistic groups of men who capitalize on an already-established human tendency to believe in m-a-g-i-c for their own personal gain…say it ain’t so! But of course that would only make sense if the folks who are in power experience a much lower level of this kind…of…rationalization…of…


— though the figure was a little lower

Yeah, by like almost half.

(37%) among respondents earning more than $150,000 a year.

Oops!

(via.)

Joe. I find myself a little happier with your veep candidacy today.

Friday, September 19th, 2008

Via Shakesville:

So, after Joe Biden said, awesomely, that paying taxes is patriotic, Sarah Palin retorted, mendaciously, that raising taxes is “about killing jobs and hurting small businesses and making things worse.”

Biden’s response?

How many small businessmen are making one million, four hundred thousand–average in the top 1 percent. Give me a break. I remind my friend, John McCain, what he said–when Bush called for war and tax cuts–he said, it was immoral, immoral, to take a nation to war and not have anybody pay for it. I am so sick and tired of this phoniness. The truth of the matter is that we are in trouble. And the people who do not need a new tax cut should be willing, as patriotic Americans, to understand the way to get this economy back up on their feet is to give middle class taxpayers a break. We take the tax cut they’re getting and we give it to the middle class.

Too. Sweet!

Sometimes Psychobabble Can Be Fun. Usually Not But Just This One Time It Kinda Was.

Friday, September 19th, 2008


Apparently this is me.

So, not too long ago at work we were suffering through some “group exercises” to “build teamwork” (thankfully there was no “hugging,” or GOD forbid, “sharing”)–BUT anyway, one of the things we did was take the Myers-Briggs assessment. I’ve never formally taken it before and certainly never done so with a whole bunch of other people. One thing I must say, the statistics provided as to what percentage of the population is usually this four-letter combination and what is usually that four-letter combination turned out to be nearly spot-on in terms of our little gang of twenty or so.

As it turns out, I am an INTP. This is an INTP:

INTPs live in the world of theoretical possibilities. They live primarily inside their own minds, having the ability to analyze difficult problems, identify patterns, and come up with logical explanations. They seek clarity in everything, and are therefore driven to build knowledge. They are the “absent-minded professors”, who highly value intelligence and the ability to apply logic to theories to find solutions.

The INTP has no understanding or value for decisions made on the basis of personal subjectivity or feelings. They strive constantly to achieve logical conclusions to problems, and don’t understand the importance or relevance of applying subjective emotional considerations to decisions. The INTP is usually very independent, unconventional, and original. They are not likely to place much value on traditional goals such as popularity and security.

INTPs are about 1% of the general population, making this one of the rarest of types.

Contributions to the team of an INTP

In a team environment, the INTP can contribute by:

* using analytical and critical skills to solve problems
* focusing attention on the central issue
* providing intellectual insight
* suggesting ideas that achieve long and short term aims
* viewing information objectively

The potential ways in which an INTP can irritate others include:

* being too intellectual
* finding too many flaws, and not accepting imperfect but ‘good enough’ solutions
* not taking account of others’ feelings
* leave others to worry about implementation once the major problems have been solved
* clinging to a principle at the expense of relationships and harmony

Yeah, well. Scarifyingly dead-on, I must say. How bout any of the rest of you PunkAssBloggites? Ever done a Myers-Briggs assessment? If so, how accurate do you think it was?

Trying, oh Trying, Not to Obsess on Sarah Palin

Monday, September 15th, 2008

It’s hard, though. I think it’s because she’s a woman and it just makes my teeth hurt when a woman pops up on the national stage and acts like a power-hungry hypocritical dingbat. Now, that’s reverse sexism–so she’s a female Huckabee! Why don’t I cringe as miserably from his existence? Clearly I need to work on this.

Today’s gem:

“She wanted to get people who believed in creationism on the board,” said Munger, a music composer and teacher. “I bumped into her once after my band played at a graduation ceremony at the Assembly of God. I said, ‘Sarah, how can you believe in creationism — your father’s a science teacher.’ And she said, ‘We don’t have to agree on everything.’ “I pushed her on the earth’s creation, whether it was really less than 7,000 years old and whether dinosaurs and humans walked the earth at the same time. And she said yes, she’d seen images somewhere of dinosaur fossils with human footprints in them.”

OOOH, run that by me…again?

“And she said yes, she’d seen images somewhere of dinosaur fossils with human footprints in them.”

Sarah Sarah Sarah! Read this!

“Christian urban legends” (CUL) is a term used by the Institute for Creation Research (ICR) on their “Science, Scripture & Salvation” radio program for 1999-APR-17. They use it to refer to those urban legends which have a Christian theme. CULs are similar to ordinary urban legends:
1. the stories are unsubstantiated.
2. they do not come from authoritative sources.
3. they describe events that never happened.

But they have one unique property: they tend to support some biblical passage or theme.

ICR is concerned that sincere, well-meaning Christians may use CULs to prove the accuracy of certain biblical passages and thus “win people to Christ.” The danger is that when the new Christian finds that the story was false, they might conclude that other information that they had received was also unreliable. This might destroy their new-found faith.

Sarah Sarah Sarah!

How Christian CULs are created:

Some are created by backward reasoning, as follows:

A conservative Christian then creates a fictional story that contains hard evidence that these events happened.
1 NASA scientists write a computer program that finds a time discontinuity.
2 Some remains from Noah’s Ark are found in Mount Ararat in Turkey.
3 Scientists drill a deep hole into the earth and hear people screaming in agony.
4 Fossilized human footprints are found which intersect dinosaur footprints.

Wedding Day!

Monday, September 15th, 2008

I cordially invite all of you PunkAssers who are in the Minnesota/ North Dakota/ Manitoba area to come to my wedding on Friday, September 19th. Please send me an email if you are available, in the area, and would like to attend.

The outside of my wedding invitation.

Clothing: *sigh*

Monday, September 15th, 2008

I keep hitting mental road-blocks when I try to do my law school assignment, so I figured I would try and contribute to my blogging duties.

This weekend, I went to the dreaded local temple to capitalism (otherwise referred to as a “mall”) with my friend PE.* I needed to find some clothes that looked somewhat professional, because I am very soon going to have to do presentations in law class, and part of the presentation is “looking professional”. Now, I hate to shop. Hate hate hate hate hate (do I need to repeat this anymore) hate hate hate it. Part of it is because my upbringing makes in near physically painful to part with money for such “luxuries” as new clothes. But part of it is because quite frankly, clothes don’t fit me.

Women’s clothes are an excellent illustration of irritating standards that women have to deal with and that people will never, ever call sexism. First and foremost, would someone PLEASE standardize the sizes? And can we have the sizes actually match something in reality, like inches? Also, please recognize that women have different breasts sizes- part of those real sizes need to understand that some women have large breasts and big bellies, some have small bellies and big breasts, and some have small bellies and small breasts. I need a freaking waist that’s a medium, but a chest that’s an extra-large. I would also like people to note that, even though I’m a giant fatass, I don’t need to be glared at for having the audacity to ask if you have it in a larger size to accommodate said ass. It is so annoying that I get treated like a pariah for needing more cloth.

But, that being said, men’s clothes aren’t much better. For one thing, women have a lot more options then men do when it comes to style and clothes.**Also, guys clothing seems to think that there is no such thing as a skinny guy. My friend PE likes the color purple- just imagine how hard it is for him to find clothes. He also runs from a small to a medium: most of the clothes at the store look like he’s swimming in fabric. But he’s not short- he’s taller than me: so smalls tend to be too short on him.

Honestly, I think it is so much easier to get clothes tailor made, but that is just not feasible for most clothes. My wedding dress, for instance, fits me like a dream, and is exactly what I want- but it took 4 months to make, and cost me $125. That’s just not feasible for my day-to-day clothing.*** I wish there was someway that mass produced clothes were a little bit less “mass” and a little bit more individual. And I wish guys had the option to have more colors than the “manly” ones.

*I like to joke that PE is my most girly friend, because although he is male, he is more likely to offer substantive criticism of outfits compared to my girlfriends (all three of them). He is also more likely to let me paint his toenails than my girlfriends.
**This is double problematic- problematic for guys who don’t get as many options, and problematic because it’s a result of women needing more clothes. My husband can use the same suit for weddings (including his own), funerals, dances, nice dinners, and interviews. Not the same for me.
*** But a really fantastic price for a wedding dress, though. Of course, add on about 60 dollars for travel, and about 40 more for the material, and it’s still pretty pricey.

Intentionally Lethal Diseases plus Hurricanes = Not Good

Sunday, September 14th, 2008

My parents just retired and bought a beach house in Galveston. Their timing was stunning.

Who knows if their house is still there. But, they’re safe in Austin and that’s all that matters as far as they’re concerned. The 140,000 others who ignored evacuation orders and stuck around, on the other hand, faced “certain death”, at least according to the National Weather Service. As the rescue efforts start in earnest, let’s hope the National Weather Service was just having a little bit of fun with hyperbole.

Did anybody else see this alarming piece of information, from the science blog Effect Measures?

Why would any sane person put a Level 4 biodefense lab in Galveston?

It’s not like no one thought Galveston could ever be hit by a monster storm. The city was almost destroyed in The Great Storm of 1900 which struck on September 8 of that year and killed 6000 people. The Thomas Edison Company has historic film footage of the destruction. So it seems a bit odd (I understate) that the geniuses at the Department of Homeland Security and NIH decided that Galveston was a good place for one of the first two high containment biodefense laboratories to be built after 9/11 (the other is situated in a densely populated neighborhood in Boston, another sterling choice). But put in Galveston they did and now it’s almost built. And another monster storm (track it in real time here) is bearing down on Galveston so the lab is being evacuated before it goes under water. (more…)

Woman as Knight Errant: Escapism for Her vs. Escapism for Him

Saturday, September 13th, 2008

Photobucket

I already derailed the comment thread on Hugo’s first post of three about the book Guyland: The Perilous World Where Boys Become Men by Michael Kimmel, and I flatly refuse to do it again to his second post, darn it! So I’m going to express myself here instead. (Amanda has another take on Hugo’s second post over at Pandagon as well.)

The title of Hugo’s second post, “Escape, Entitlement, and Empowerment: young men and the ‘Four Ps’” pretty much says it all (the “Four Ps” being Pot, Playstation, Porn and Poker). Focusing in on the “Playstation” P, he quotes a few paragraphs of Kimmel–as a “Playstation P” woman, I was fascinated to try and analyze where I coincided with the “guys” and where (if anywhere) I took off on my own, and what meaning that might have in terms of gendered arguments such as the one below. Let’s examine it!

Because, as it turns out, the fantasy world of media is both an escape from reality and an escape to reality — the reality that many of these guys would secretly like to inhabit. Video games, in particular, provide a way for guys to feel empowered. In their daily lives guys often feel that they don’t measure up to the standards of the Guy Code — always be in control, never show weakness, neediness, vulnerability — and so they create ideal versions of themselves in fantasy. The thinking is simple: if somebody messes with your avatar, you blow him away. It’s a fantasy world of Manichean good and evil, a world in which violence is restorative and actions have no consequences whatsoever.

This doesn’t resonate with me at all. It isn’t that I don’t feel I always have to be in control and never show weakness, neediness and vulnerability–quite the opposite! As a woman in a heavily male-dominated profession, I must show more control and far less weakness/neediness/vulnerability than even your average guy can get away with, if I want to be taken at all seriously. In my personal life, as a feminist single mother raising two sons, again, the pressure to provide such an invulnerable role model is constant and unrelenting. However, I have no urge to physical violence–I rarely ever have such an urge, except in situations where I am directly physically attacked by another person. Therefore, I find no psychological freedom or release in the knowledge that oh hey, I CAN kick that sumbitch’s ass here! Woot! As a matter of fact, the need to suppress weakness, neediness and vulnerability is no different in the virtual world of Warcraft than it is in the real world on Earth, not for me. I am a woman in a MMORPG (for all you noobs, that’s a “massively multiplayer online role-playing game”); I’d better not act like some kind of pussy if I’m in a group! The lack of consequences does not appeal to me either, again, as there are certainly game consequences for acting like a dumbass–the only “consequences” that could be said to be escaped are, if you choose to massacre other players or computer-generated characters, you won’t go to jail. Since I have no urge to do so, there is no relief of any suppressed feelings for me.

They’re getting a parallel education to the formal curriculum — complete with its own Three Rs: Relaxation from the weight of adult demands and of the rules of social decorum (also now known as political correctness); Revenge, against those who have usurped what you thought was yours; and, Restoration to your rightful entitled position in the world.

Oh now, Relaxation I understand! World of Warcraft is most definitely an escape from the real world, with its stupid obsession with minutae and social interaction–it’s puzzle-solving and ass-kicking fun, pure and simple and wholly engrossing. Revenge…again, that does not resonate. Revenge against whom? Those I might possibly want revenge against are still quite in power in the mythical World–there are kings, commanders, wealthy merchants, etc–the World is just as hierarchical and biased in favor of those with money and power as the real world. Now, WoW does offer you a far more straighforward path to success than the real world does–it is the most basic and pure distillation of the highest ideals of capitalism and the Protestant work ethic–as long as you are willing to buckle down and spend lots of time and effort at the earning, you will guaranteed rise to a position of great power and wealth, without the unfairnesses of pre-existing family and coinage and irrational prejudices that beset us in reality. I do quite appreciate that…but there really is no revenge factor there. It’s much more along the lines of the first R, relaxation–not having to navigate pitfalls to success that are a function of the real world and none of my personal making.

Restoration–oh yes, that DOES resonate with me, though after reading the next paragraph, I realize that I have finally hit upon the strange dichotomy that is the real gendered difference in the “Playstation” P.

They spend so much of their lives being bossed around by other people– teachers, parents, bosses–it’s really a relief to be the meanest, most violent, and vengeful SOB around. And they spend so much of their lives in a world that is, if not dominated by women, at least is characterized by women’s presumed equality, that it’s nice to turn back the clock and return to a time when men ruled — and no one questioned it.

This is almost funny.

Here is how it would look if it were rewritten for me.

She spends so much of her life being bossed around by men–bosses, politicians, religious leaders–it’s really a relief to be in a place where her gender is only a matter of aesthetic choice; it in no way affects her career, her autonomy or her physical abilities both real and perceived by others. No matter what others in the World say or think or even try to do, they cannot discriminate against her on the basis of her gender–she can be and do anything she wants, finally and incontrovertibly–the most anyone can do is spit a few obscenities, and that is easily remedied by simply placing them on Ignore.

Whereas the “guys” apparently want to be conscienceless reavers, motivated by and answering sheerly and only to their grossest whim at the moment and are therefore freed by that state, what I want to be, as it turns out, is a hero. Women aren’t heroes, you know. There is one form of “heroism” and one only that women are encouraged (we might even say “forced,” betimes) to pursue, and that is the “heroism” of complete self-immolation. Women are lauded for sacrificing every personal inclination to further the ambitions of their husbands and devoting themselves to raising children. The “heroic” woman is one who lives in a permanent and driven state of personal servitude to men and children. The ultimate sacrifice, of giving your life for your freedom, the freedom of others, an ideal–women are actively discouraged from any form of that heroism except that of dying in the name of pregnancy. A woman’s heroism is never exciting, never results in great power or prestige or personal gain or adulation–a woman’s heroism is by definition hidden behind those surrounding her, done in as much silence and humility as possible, and always in the channel of her reproductive and homemaking function.

In the World, I can be a hero in all the ways men are encouraged and lauded to be heroes–I can use my force of arms to defend the weak; I can choose any number of professions to further my defense of the weak; I can gain great fame and riches in pursuit of my heroism and my name will be known throughout the realms. (Seriously!) My reproductive function, in fact, does not exist at all.

So, interestingly enough, in an unregulated fantasy environment, I aspire to the ideal of heroic manhood–that is what I find so freeing and liberating–and guys aspire to the ideal of amoral piracy–that is what they find so freeing and liberating–apparently no one aspires to the ideal of self-sacrificing womanhood–er, surprise surprise..? Probably the most intriguing (and distressing) aspect of this is how said guys can perceive themselves as living in a society where women control them so strongly while I perceive myself living in a society where men control me so strongly…the SAME SOCIETY..? A puzzle. I expect I will give it a lot more thought and perhaps a follow-up post will be forthcoming–stay tuned!

It was so bad, I was almost hoping she’d suddenly start speaking in tongues. Anything to break up the cringefest. And yes, that would have been less embarrassing.

Friday, September 12th, 2008

You know, people in other countries watch this shit and so do total misogynists. Then again, why worry about what people in other countries think about America’s choices for Supreme Leadership of our country? After eight years of Dubya, how could their opinion of our intelligence fall any further? And misogynists are quite capable of sneering at and grossly insulting the intelligence of women in general regardless of whether or not we shove corroborating evidence for their usually groundless beliefs on national TV. There, now I feel better. “Better” in the sense that I’ve convinced myself that there’s no real reason to feel “worse.” Well, not quite. There’s always that one little future terror…in the immortal words of Melissa McEwan of Shakesville: “Please, dear Cheesus, don’t let this person anywhere near Teh Button.”

I don’t need to strain myself for opinion bytes on Sarah Palin’s interview performance in the first of a series of three with ABC’s Charles Gibson; the rest of the media world has already done a thorough job for me. To wit:

LA Times:

Palin called the Russian incursion into Georgia last month “unprovoked,” a view at odds with that of U.S. officials who have reviewed events leading up to the military action.

NBC4:

Asked whether the United States would have to go to war with Russia if it invaded Georgia, and the tiny country was part of NATO, Palin said: “Perhaps so.”

WaPo:

Gov. Sarah Palin linked the war in Iraq with the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, telling an Iraq-bound brigade of soldiers that included her son that they would “defend the innocent from the enemies who planned and carried out and rejoiced in the death of thousands of Americans.” The idea that the Iraqi government under Saddam Hussein helped al-Qaeda plan the attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon, a view once promoted by Bush administration officials, has since been rejected even by the president himself.

(Okay, that one wasn’t from the interview. Just more salt rubbed into the wound while I was torturing myself reading the media coverage.)

Slate:

In an on-location-in-Alaska interview that consumed 11 or 12 minutes of the Thursday edition of World News Tonight and continues later tonight on Nightline and again tomorrow on World News Tonight and 20/20, Palin recited her answers as if reading from a Teleprompter inside her head. The extensive coaching she has received could not save her from embarrassment in this exchange.

Gibson: Do you agree with the Bush Doctrine?

Palin: In what respect, Charlie?

Gibson: What do you interpret it to be?

Palin: His worldview?

Gibson: No, the Bush Doctrine, enunciated in September 2002, before the Iraq War.

Palin attempts to fake it for 25 seconds with a swirl of generalities before Gibson, showing all the gentleness of a remedial social studies teacher, interjects.

Gibson: The Bush Doctrine as I understand it is that we have the right of anticipatory self-defense. That we have the right of a preemptive strike against any other country that we think is going to attack us. Do you agree with that?

Of course Palin agrees with the Bush Doctrine, but she can’t come out and say so, having just admitted that she doesn’t know it by name.

I haven’t decided if I’m going to inflict parts 2 and 3 on myself yet. While I’m deciding, here’s a nice video of Assembly-of-Goddites speaking in tongues.

Kicking punkass and taking names

Friday, September 12th, 2008

By the way, if you haven’t watched any of Amanda and Marc’s new series, RH Reality Check, please do so now. They’re really great. I am so proud.

(They’re on YouTube, too, for any who might have trouble with Vimeo.)

Normally, Our Glorious Founder Punkass Marc does his magic behind the camera, but he makes a cameo in this particular episode:


RH Reality Check: Abstinence-Only Vs. Comprehensive Sex Education from RH Reality Check on Vimeo.

Q: How is a bombing raid in the Great War on Terror like an old-school southern lynching?

Thursday, September 11th, 2008

A: The ones doing the killing never seem to care if the intelligence it’s based on is actually true.

Q: Why not?

Brad Hicks: (emphasis mine)

If you studied American history prior to about 2000, even if you studied it at the college level, you were almost certainly taught something wrong, because the truth was one of America’s last, best-kept secrets. And it has to do with lynching. You see, if you studied before then, one of the things you were told about lynching was that lynching was usually motivated by anger, by hatred, by exaggerated fear of “impurity,” by anger over Reconstruction, by irrational over-reaction to minor black crimes. But then a historian made a lucky find, one that unlocked a whole field of study. A set of records, more or less accidentally compiled, gave us a longer and more comprehensive list of lynchings than we had. A very macabre set of records.

…That made it possible to research not just a few lynchings, but hundreds of them, and to compile statistics on what had happened before and after them. And the terrible, but fascinating, bit of secret history turned out to be the immediate aftermath of over half of those lynchings. Over half of those lynchings turned out to involve black men who owned their own successful farms and/or businesses. And the day after the lynchings, those farms and businesses were sold to white neighbors, in closed auctions, for pennies on the dollar, and the surviving real heirs were run out of town. And in a terrifyingly large number of those cases, historians were able to show one or more of the following facts. The buyer was the person who made the initial accusation against the victim. And the buyer was a relative of one or more of the following: the mayor, the chief of police, the local minister and/or the municipal judge.

I want you to get this through your head, and never forget it. Lynching was not a hate crime. Lynching was an economic crime.

On August 22, the US Military targeted civilian homes in Azizabad, Afghanistan. Depending on which accounts you choose to believe, they either killed 92 innocent civilians, including as many as 60 children; or 30-35 Taliban militants plus “only” 5-7 innocent civilians. (So I guess that would make it okay then.) Ludicrously, US Military sources have been claiming that the discrepancy is due to Taliban convincing the villagers to fake the evidence, even suggesting that they built fake mass graves to fool UN inspectors and international reporters.

The US military said that its findings were corroborated by an independent journalist embedded with the US force. He was named as the Fox News correspondent Oliver North, who came to prominence in the 1980s Iran-Contra affair, when he was an army colonel.

…right. Well then it must be true, because it’s not like Ollie North ever lied on behalf of the US government or anything.

But that’s not where I’m going with this.

(more…)