<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sarah Palin is too much, too little, and too late.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://punkassblog.com/2008/08/29/sarah-palin-is-too-much-too-little-and-too-late/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://punkassblog.com/2008/08/29/sarah-palin-is-too-much-too-little-and-too-late/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 01:07:42 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rabbit</title>
		<link>http://punkassblog.com/2008/08/29/sarah-palin-is-too-much-too-little-and-too-late/#comment-74588</link>
		<dc:creator>Rabbit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 18:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punkassblog.com/2008/08/29/sarah-palin-is-too-much-too-little-and-too-late/#comment-74588</guid>
		<description>I don't think that men as a whole would not favor Palin but I do think that men who belong to the religious right may hesitate to vote for Palin because she is a woman, as illustrated by the excerpts posted by Kyso. 

As noted in the site you linked to, the higher approval for Palin among men may be simply be due to the fact that men as a whole tend to be more conservative than women.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that men as a whole would not favor Palin but I do think that men who belong to the religious right may hesitate to vote for Palin because she is a woman, as illustrated by the excerpts posted by Kyso. </p>
<p>As noted in the site you linked to, the higher approval for Palin among men may be simply be due to the fact that men as a whole tend to be more conservative than women.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thene</title>
		<link>http://punkassblog.com/2008/08/29/sarah-palin-is-too-much-too-little-and-too-late/#comment-74571</link>
		<dc:creator>Thene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 15:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punkassblog.com/2008/08/29/sarah-palin-is-too-much-too-little-and-too-late/#comment-74571</guid>
		<description>Rabbit, I thought you were saying the converse - that men would &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; favour Palin because, vagina, do not want.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rabbit, I thought you were saying the converse - that men would <i>not</i> favour Palin because, vagina, do not want.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quin</title>
		<link>http://punkassblog.com/2008/08/29/sarah-palin-is-too-much-too-little-and-too-late/#comment-74566</link>
		<dc:creator>Quin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 13:15:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punkassblog.com/2008/08/29/sarah-palin-is-too-much-too-little-and-too-late/#comment-74566</guid>
		<description>I am surprised and intrigued by McCain's VP choice and unlike many others, I did not see this one coming. Be interesting to see how this plays out. Right now the fundies are not taking it too well, but give it a few days-- maybe they'll start rationalizing and find a way to accept her the way that the "Hope and change" crowd has rationalized and accepted war-cheerleader-cum-crusader-for-the-rights-of-MBNA-execs-everywhere Biden.

One thing I know, Mike Huckabee sure is pissed right now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am surprised and intrigued by McCain&#8217;s VP choice and unlike many others, I did not see this one coming. Be interesting to see how this plays out. Right now the fundies are not taking it too well, but give it a few days&#8211; maybe they&#8217;ll start rationalizing and find a way to accept her the way that the &#8220;Hope and change&#8221; crowd has rationalized and accepted war-cheerleader-cum-crusader-for-the-rights-of-MBNA-execs-everywhere Biden.</p>
<p>One thing I know, Mike Huckabee sure is pissed right now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rabbit</title>
		<link>http://punkassblog.com/2008/08/29/sarah-palin-is-too-much-too-little-and-too-late/#comment-74522</link>
		<dc:creator>Rabbit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 21:03:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punkassblog.com/2008/08/29/sarah-palin-is-too-much-too-little-and-too-late/#comment-74522</guid>
		<description>Um, I wasn't saying that women &lt;i&gt;would&lt;/i&gt; prefer Palin. In fact that's kind of the opposite of what I was saying.

There is a lot of speculation on various blogs that McCain picked Palin because she is a woman, perhaps to woo some disenchanted Clinton supporters. But that seems unlikely because, well, it's a shitty strategy (as illustrated by the quotes Kyso K provided). 

Therefore either McCain et al picked a shit strategy or that isn't their strategy at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, I wasn&#8217;t saying that women <i>would</i> prefer Palin. In fact that&#8217;s kind of the opposite of what I was saying.</p>
<p>There is a lot of speculation on various blogs that McCain picked Palin because she is a woman, perhaps to woo some disenchanted Clinton supporters. But that seems unlikely because, well, it&#8217;s a shitty strategy (as illustrated by the quotes Kyso K provided). </p>
<p>Therefore either McCain et al picked a shit strategy or that isn&#8217;t their strategy at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thene</title>
		<link>http://punkassblog.com/2008/08/29/sarah-palin-is-too-much-too-little-and-too-late/#comment-74521</link>
		<dc:creator>Thene</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 20:38:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punkassblog.com/2008/08/29/sarah-palin-is-too-much-too-little-and-too-late/#comment-74521</guid>
		<description>Rabbit - not so.  &lt;a href="http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/08/women-more-skeptical-of-palin-than-men.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;538 have noted that women view Palin less favourably than men do&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Rabbit - not so.  <a href="http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/08/women-more-skeptical-of-palin-than-men.html" rel="nofollow">538 have noted that women view Palin less favourably than men do</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rabbit</title>
		<link>http://punkassblog.com/2008/08/29/sarah-palin-is-too-much-too-little-and-too-late/#comment-74504</link>
		<dc:creator>Rabbit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 17:20:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punkassblog.com/2008/08/29/sarah-palin-is-too-much-too-little-and-too-late/#comment-74504</guid>
		<description>So, a lot of the talk about Palin that I've heard is how McCain apparently thinks die hard Clinton supporters are too stupid to tell one a woman from another. And I have to admit, the choice of Palin feels a lot like an attempt to be all like "hey we have a cool young ground breaking candidate on this ticket too! And she's female just like the Hillary woman you're all going on about" 

But really? I think that there are a lot more of the religious (and plain ol' secular sexist) right who will go "OMG vagina! Do not want!" than there are PUMAs. I mean, right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, a lot of the talk about Palin that I&#8217;ve heard is how McCain apparently thinks die hard Clinton supporters are too stupid to tell one a woman from another. And I have to admit, the choice of Palin feels a lot like an attempt to be all like &#8220;hey we have a cool young ground breaking candidate on this ticket too! And she&#8217;s female just like the Hillary woman you&#8217;re all going on about&#8221; </p>
<p>But really? I think that there are a lot more of the religious (and plain ol&#8217; secular sexist) right who will go &#8220;OMG vagina! Do not want!&#8221; than there are PUMAs. I mean, right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jix</title>
		<link>http://punkassblog.com/2008/08/29/sarah-palin-is-too-much-too-little-and-too-late/#comment-74501</link>
		<dc:creator>Jix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 17:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punkassblog.com/2008/08/29/sarah-palin-is-too-much-too-little-and-too-late/#comment-74501</guid>
		<description>Why wouldn't the new kid's dad take care of him?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why wouldn&#8217;t the new kid&#8217;s dad take care of him?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa Kansas</title>
		<link>http://punkassblog.com/2008/08/29/sarah-palin-is-too-much-too-little-and-too-late/#comment-74481</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Kansas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 08:36:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punkassblog.com/2008/08/29/sarah-palin-is-too-much-too-little-and-too-late/#comment-74481</guid>
		<description>I read the link, though, and I am excited to announce that women CAN be prophetesses!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I read the link, though, and I am excited to announce that women CAN be prophetesses!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lisa Kansas</title>
		<link>http://punkassblog.com/2008/08/29/sarah-palin-is-too-much-too-little-and-too-late/#comment-74467</link>
		<dc:creator>Lisa Kansas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 05:09:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punkassblog.com/2008/08/29/sarah-palin-is-too-much-too-little-and-too-late/#comment-74467</guid>
		<description>"It was from this post that I learned Palin returned to work a mere three days after having her latest child, who is afflicted with Down’s Syndrome. From this, I infer two things: first, god damn, there’s a woman used to working at least twice, if not six or seven times, as hard to be considered half as good. I mean, just, damn. And second: someone’s got a lot of help at home. A lot. Of really trustworthy help, because who besides your own mother do you leave a special-needs newborn with?"

Most states won't certify caregivers, whether a center or in-home, for infants younger than six weeks, nevermind whether or not they're special needs--so if you're going back to work sooner than that, you're either leaving the kid with friends or family or you're using somebody borderline-shady to say the least.  Also, Sarah clearly didn't have any health issues of her own resulting from pregnancy and childbirth--those of us who, say, suffered from pre-eclampsia were still on bedrest and anticonvulsant meds three days after childbirth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It was from this post that I learned Palin returned to work a mere three days after having her latest child, who is afflicted with Down’s Syndrome. From this, I infer two things: first, god damn, there’s a woman used to working at least twice, if not six or seven times, as hard to be considered half as good. I mean, just, damn. And second: someone’s got a lot of help at home. A lot. Of really trustworthy help, because who besides your own mother do you leave a special-needs newborn with?&#8221;</p>
<p>Most states won&#8217;t certify caregivers, whether a center or in-home, for infants younger than six weeks, nevermind whether or not they&#8217;re special needs&#8211;so if you&#8217;re going back to work sooner than that, you&#8217;re either leaving the kid with friends or family or you&#8217;re using somebody borderline-shady to say the least.  Also, Sarah clearly didn&#8217;t have any health issues of her own resulting from pregnancy and childbirth&#8211;those of us who, say, suffered from pre-eclampsia were still on bedrest and anticonvulsant meds three days after childbirth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
