<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Men&#8221; and &#8220;mankind&#8221; apparently not being defined to include &#8220;ambulatory wombs.&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://punkassblog.com/2008/07/21/men-and-mankind-apparently-not-being-defined-to-include-ambulatory-wombs/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://punkassblog.com/2008/07/21/men-and-mankind-apparently-not-being-defined-to-include-ambulatory-wombs/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 21:54:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: lis</title>
		<link>http://punkassblog.com/2008/07/21/men-and-mankind-apparently-not-being-defined-to-include-ambulatory-wombs/comment-page-1/#comment-213862</link>
		<dc:creator>lis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Mar 2009 15:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punkassblog.com/2008/07/21/men-and-mankind-apparently-not-being-defined-to-include-ambulatory-wombs/#comment-213862</guid>
		<description>LOL!  Yes.. *sigh* people suck and so many forever look for ways to make themselves feel bigger and put everyone else down. I&#039;ve learned to just ignore and/or block them out.  98% of what we are exposed to as &quot;culture&quot; is crap and garbage. I&#039;m tired of the unecessary stresses. It&#039;s detrimental.
Go mother nature! let it ride whatever your situation.. do whatcha gotta do and block out the assies! OHHMMMMMMMMs to you all
namaste :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL!  Yes.. *sigh* people suck and so many forever look for ways to make themselves feel bigger and put everyone else down. I&#8217;ve learned to just ignore and/or block them out.  98% of what we are exposed to as &#8220;culture&#8221; is crap and garbage. I&#8217;m tired of the unecessary stresses. It&#8217;s detrimental.<br />
Go mother nature! let it ride whatever your situation.. do whatcha gotta do and block out the assies! OHHMMMMMMMMs to you all<br />
namaste <img src='http://punkassblog.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ElleR</title>
		<link>http://punkassblog.com/2008/07/21/men-and-mankind-apparently-not-being-defined-to-include-ambulatory-wombs/comment-page-1/#comment-146089</link>
		<dc:creator>ElleR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punkassblog.com/2008/07/21/men-and-mankind-apparently-not-being-defined-to-include-ambulatory-wombs/#comment-146089</guid>
		<description>Great post! And great title.  Patriarchy is founded on the concept that only men are fully human.  The terms &quot;Man&quot; and &quot;Mankind&quot; do only refer to the males of the species, protestations that women are included to the contrary. The ability to make a choice is a male attribute; women who believe they are capable of making a choice are clearly deluding themselves. 

As I said, this is a great, consciousness-raising post. I got here via a comment on the reclusive leftist blog. I&#039;ll be back.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post! And great title.  Patriarchy is founded on the concept that only men are fully human.  The terms &#8220;Man&#8221; and &#8220;Mankind&#8221; do only refer to the males of the species, protestations that women are included to the contrary. The ability to make a choice is a male attribute; women who believe they are capable of making a choice are clearly deluding themselves. </p>
<p>As I said, this is a great, consciousness-raising post. I got here via a comment on the reclusive leftist blog. I&#8217;ll be back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tehcrim</title>
		<link>http://punkassblog.com/2008/07/21/men-and-mankind-apparently-not-being-defined-to-include-ambulatory-wombs/comment-page-1/#comment-74820</link>
		<dc:creator>Tehcrim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 04:35:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punkassblog.com/2008/07/21/men-and-mankind-apparently-not-being-defined-to-include-ambulatory-wombs/#comment-74820</guid>
		<description>This looks like a thinly veiled attempt at creating a discussion about abortion.  &quot;Woman&#039;s right over her body&quot; etc.  I&#039;ll admit that I&#039;m pro-life (as an atheist even, woah what??), so since I&#039;m doubting anyone will want to hear any opinion of that, I&#039;ll re-state the point that&#039;s been made a few times already:  Choices bring consequences.

I&#039;m a man, so I&#039;m not even going to pretend that I know what women are going through when they make the choices they do, but has anyone considered the feminist ideal as the cause of the critical judgements of choices?  Because, being as close to an average person as I can imagine, I&#039;ve got quite a few judgemental thoughts on several of those scenarios, but others are either workable or exceptional.  In either case, unless there&#039;s a child in a bad situation, I&#039;ll leave the woman to her devices unless they ask my opinion.

The point of that is, who&#039;s doing the real criticizing?  I&#039;m thinking that it&#039;s mostly other women who made a different choice.  Or powerful people on soapboxes, but who really takes them seriously nowadays anyway?

Oh, one other thing:  Buy a hummer, commie!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This looks like a thinly veiled attempt at creating a discussion about abortion.  &#8220;Woman&#8217;s right over her body&#8221; etc.  I&#8217;ll admit that I&#8217;m pro-life (as an atheist even, woah what??), so since I&#8217;m doubting anyone will want to hear any opinion of that, I&#8217;ll re-state the point that&#8217;s been made a few times already:  Choices bring consequences.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a man, so I&#8217;m not even going to pretend that I know what women are going through when they make the choices they do, but has anyone considered the feminist ideal as the cause of the critical judgements of choices?  Because, being as close to an average person as I can imagine, I&#8217;ve got quite a few judgemental thoughts on several of those scenarios, but others are either workable or exceptional.  In either case, unless there&#8217;s a child in a bad situation, I&#8217;ll leave the woman to her devices unless they ask my opinion.</p>
<p>The point of that is, who&#8217;s doing the real criticizing?  I&#8217;m thinking that it&#8217;s mostly other women who made a different choice.  Or powerful people on soapboxes, but who really takes them seriously nowadays anyway?</p>
<p>Oh, one other thing:  Buy a hummer, commie!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Fergusun</title>
		<link>http://punkassblog.com/2008/07/21/men-and-mankind-apparently-not-being-defined-to-include-ambulatory-wombs/comment-page-1/#comment-74817</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Fergusun</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Sep 2008 03:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punkassblog.com/2008/07/21/men-and-mankind-apparently-not-being-defined-to-include-ambulatory-wombs/#comment-74817</guid>
		<description>Oh, can it and go bake me a pie, woman.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, can it and go bake me a pie, woman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cliff</title>
		<link>http://punkassblog.com/2008/07/21/men-and-mankind-apparently-not-being-defined-to-include-ambulatory-wombs/comment-page-1/#comment-74793</link>
		<dc:creator>Cliff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 17:45:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punkassblog.com/2008/07/21/men-and-mankind-apparently-not-being-defined-to-include-ambulatory-wombs/#comment-74793</guid>
		<description>Another way to look at this is that you are criticized because you have been given choice.  In the restrictive societies you mention, there is not admonishment of the woman, but other cultures do criticize the men who are in control.  So we in the west constantly criticize muslim men who head restrictive societies for the way they treat their women, because those men are the ones who make the decisions, who have the choice. 

In other words, with choice comes criticism.  

Not that I agree with the criticism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another way to look at this is that you are criticized because you have been given choice.  In the restrictive societies you mention, there is not admonishment of the woman, but other cultures do criticize the men who are in control.  So we in the west constantly criticize muslim men who head restrictive societies for the way they treat their women, because those men are the ones who make the decisions, who have the choice. </p>
<p>In other words, with choice comes criticism.  </p>
<p>Not that I agree with the criticism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snark Scribe</title>
		<link>http://punkassblog.com/2008/07/21/men-and-mankind-apparently-not-being-defined-to-include-ambulatory-wombs/comment-page-1/#comment-71584</link>
		<dc:creator>Snark Scribe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jul 2008 01:48:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punkassblog.com/2008/07/21/men-and-mankind-apparently-not-being-defined-to-include-ambulatory-wombs/#comment-71584</guid>
		<description>I was directed here through the blog carnival, and I&#039;d like to say this is a wonderful post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was directed here through the blog carnival, and I&#8217;d like to say this is a wonderful post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elena</title>
		<link>http://punkassblog.com/2008/07/21/men-and-mankind-apparently-not-being-defined-to-include-ambulatory-wombs/comment-page-1/#comment-71346</link>
		<dc:creator>Elena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 03:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punkassblog.com/2008/07/21/men-and-mankind-apparently-not-being-defined-to-include-ambulatory-wombs/#comment-71346</guid>
		<description>You left out this one: 
You&#039;re married, get pregnant, and manage to figure out a way to do paid work from home while caring for your baby.
Slacker!  You aren&#039;t devoting enough time and energy to your job or your child!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You left out this one:<br />
You&#8217;re married, get pregnant, and manage to figure out a way to do paid work from home while caring for your baby.<br />
Slacker!  You aren&#8217;t devoting enough time and energy to your job or your child!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: violet</title>
		<link>http://punkassblog.com/2008/07/21/men-and-mankind-apparently-not-being-defined-to-include-ambulatory-wombs/comment-page-1/#comment-71341</link>
		<dc:creator>violet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 00:03:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punkassblog.com/2008/07/21/men-and-mankind-apparently-not-being-defined-to-include-ambulatory-wombs/#comment-71341</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Why, in a country purportedly founded upon the rights of the individual to choose any number of things–why we have created a situation where doing so is overwhelmingly disapproved of, a situation where the only fix in terms of general societal approval would be to remove entirely that right..?&lt;/blockquote&gt;Because, I think, we don&#039;t genuinely value true individual expression and choice&#8212;we value the authority that comes from asserting that it&#039;s fundamental to our society.

Hmm&#8230; that may actually warrant a bit more when I get a chance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Why, in a country purportedly founded upon the rights of the individual to choose any number of things–why we have created a situation where doing so is overwhelmingly disapproved of, a situation where the only fix in terms of general societal approval would be to remove entirely that right..?</p></blockquote>
<p>Because, I think, we don&#8217;t genuinely value true individual expression and choice&#8212;we value the authority that comes from asserting that it&#8217;s fundamental to our society.</p>
<p>Hmm&#8230; that may actually warrant a bit more when I get a chance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Esme</title>
		<link>http://punkassblog.com/2008/07/21/men-and-mankind-apparently-not-being-defined-to-include-ambulatory-wombs/comment-page-1/#comment-71284</link>
		<dc:creator>Esme</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 01:38:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punkassblog.com/2008/07/21/men-and-mankind-apparently-not-being-defined-to-include-ambulatory-wombs/#comment-71284</guid>
		<description>Getting permanently sterilized is even harder. No matter what, though, women&#039;s reproductive choices are seen as a fit realm for government control, from preventing conception through birth control pills, sterilization, or EC. Abortion is regulated to the point where it&#039;s impossible for many women to get them, and the more LIBERAL of our candidates is saying that he doesn&#039;t trust women not to get third trimester abortions when &quot;feeling blue.&quot; Even birth is a highly political issue (one that has been routinely discussed on this blog, I might add), ranging from condemnation of C-sections, to government restrictions on home birth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Getting permanently sterilized is even harder. No matter what, though, women&#8217;s reproductive choices are seen as a fit realm for government control, from preventing conception through birth control pills, sterilization, or EC. Abortion is regulated to the point where it&#8217;s impossible for many women to get them, and the more LIBERAL of our candidates is saying that he doesn&#8217;t trust women not to get third trimester abortions when &#8220;feeling blue.&#8221; Even birth is a highly political issue (one that has been routinely discussed on this blog, I might add), ranging from condemnation of C-sections, to government restrictions on home birth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: og</title>
		<link>http://punkassblog.com/2008/07/21/men-and-mankind-apparently-not-being-defined-to-include-ambulatory-wombs/comment-page-1/#comment-71281</link>
		<dc:creator>og</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 01:22:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punkassblog.com/2008/07/21/men-and-mankind-apparently-not-being-defined-to-include-ambulatory-wombs/#comment-71281</guid>
		<description>sorry to double post: 

i read esme&#039;s comment now, thanks. if it&#039;s about the legal situation in the way she described, then it makes sense to me and i agree. i didn&#039;t know about legal difficulties in getting (temporarily) sterilized or contraception.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry to double post: </p>
<p>i read esme&#8217;s comment now, thanks. if it&#8217;s about the legal situation in the way she described, then it makes sense to me and i agree. i didn&#8217;t know about legal difficulties in getting (temporarily) sterilized or contraception.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
