If the universe folds in on itself on May 16th, I will shake my angry fist at Phyllis Schlafly and the Washington University administration as my atoms are squished into oblivion. Few will understand what’s happening and why, but I will — and so will you, dear doomed readers. For May 16th hath been decreed the day that Schlafly will receive an honorary doctorate from Wash U as a “national leader of the conservative movement.”

Some people will probably blame Chris Matthews giving the school’s commencement speech for our downfall. Understandable. The eardrums of most attendees will have exploded by the time he finishes whatever screeching-yet-somehow-also-dithering rant he made his interns whip up, and I wouldn’t blame any prospective Jedi for striking him down on stage after confusing Matthews for a young Emperor Palpatine.



Is this Matthews?


Or this?

No, the universe will collapse as they hand the piece of paper to Schlafly honoring her for spending her life trying to prevent women from being honored. She will be the woman most celebrated for her accomplishments that night when the bulk of her work attacks the very idea of women accomplishing anything ever.

Moreover, Schlafly merely recycles the same half-dozen or so “ideas” throughout her work, and a central theme of hers is the horrors of college. Lets examine some of the advice she offered college kids in the 90s:

Take engineering, math and science. You learn things that are true, not things that are false and must be unlearned later.

Huh. Do you think her honorary degree will be in engineering, math, science, or untrue?

Avoid taking advice from college counselors. They are working for the college and are looking out for the financial interests of the college, not the students.

Let’s leave aside the intriguing notion that counselors earning $18k a year from the school are doing their job for love of the school’s money and not the kids. Since Ms. Schlafly believes people who work for the school put the school’s financial interests ahead of academic integrity, and since her degree was decided upon by administrators and not academics, couldn’t this mean — gasp! — that she’s being exploited as a token offering to conservative donors? Scandalous.

Don’t think you can get into a first-rate college because you are smart. Michele Hernandez, Dean of Admissions at Dartmouth, says you have a better chance of being admitted if you are from a ghetto, a barrio or an Indian reservation, or if you can be someone they can feel sorry for, even if your academic qualifications are lower.

My goodness, all those brown people who might be attending the ceremony certainly must be giving Phyllis the heebie-jeebies. They’ll probably be too dumb to understand what she’s saying, though, so that’s a relief.

All I can do is beg Ms. (hopefully not Dr.) Schlafly to refuse the doctorate on the grounds that, based on her work, no woman deserves this or any other recognition, because women can’t be leaders of men, and because academic honors brand you a lesbo commie slut with inflated grades. In conclusion, if she says yes, her hypocrisy makes universe go boom.


7 Responses to “Schlafly hypocrisy threatens universe at particle level”  

  1. 1 Antigone

    For the love of the Flying Spaghetti Monster, why is this hypocritical monster still allowed to speak in public? Annoying little conservative.

  2. 2 Thomas Thurman

    All I can do is beg Ms. (hopefully not Dr.) Schlafly to refuse the doctorate

    She is Dr Schlafly, but not because of this business (honorary doctorates don’t grant the title); she gained a perfectly real J.D. from Washington University in 1978. How she squares this with her ideas on women and college, I’m not too sure.

  3. 3 Lisa KS

    “Don’t think you can get into a first-rate college because you are smart.”

    Even a stopped clock is right twice a day, ya know. Really, your best chance is to have wealthy parents. Smart, eh. Sorting people into secondary and tertiary schools based on brainpower is something they do in those nasty socialist European countries, ew!

    I’d pity the Schlaf if she hadn’t taken her bitter rage and frustration about how her adult life turned out and vented it as hurtfully as she could (and still can) on every other woman who got to do all that stuff she didn’t. Since she did, I despise her instead.

  4. 4 Kyso Kisaen

    I wonder what Michele Hernandez’s agenda is, because I doubt many of your top-tier colleges admit based on a 4-point pity scale.

  5. 5 Amanda Marcotte

    I will never understand how ambitious anti-feminist women get away with the con job.

  6. 6 Esme

    The willful obliviance of their audiences.

  7. 7 Esme

    I guess that should be obliviousness. But it’s finals week, so my brain is roughly the consistency of pudding.

Leave a Reply


Check Spelling
Activate Spell Check while Typing


Bad Behavior has blocked 5005 access attempts in the last 7 days.