when the status quo frustrates.

Lookie who’s gone all fish-hugging on us. Wonder what prompted that?

Friday, July 20th, 2007

World Net Daily asks us environmentalist feminazis: what do you love more, bitch, your precious promiscuity or the planet?

While environmentalists are usually vocal about perceived threats ranging from pesticides to global warming, there is a silence when it comes to one threat already harming the water supply: hormones from birth-control pills.

…George Harden, a board member of the Society of Catholic Social Scientists, based in Steubenville, Ohio, says people should not hold their breath for action to be taken.

“If you’re killing mosquitoes to save people from the West Nile virus, you can count on secular environmentalists to lay down in front of the vapor truck, claiming some potential side effect that might result from the spray,” Harden told the Register. “But if birth control deforms fish – backed by the proof of an EPA study – and threatens the drinking supply, mum will be the word.”

Oh, my god, could it be true that every time I urinate, an endangered fish angel gets its wings? To google! Where we find an article featuring the WND scare quote, “It’s “the first thing that I’ve seen as a scientist that really scared me,” university biologist John Woodling told the Denver Post.”

Estrogen mimickers are believed to be caused by chemicals called nonylphenols, found in everything from paints and rubber to cosmetics and plastics. They are considered a possible cause of kidney, eye, liver and reproductive problems.

They’ve been banned in much of Europe and are under review in Canada, but are still common in America, where they are flowing out of sewage plants and into clean water flowing into America’s rivers.

That’s right, every wanton strumpet in America could toss her pills tomorrow and we’d still have an estrogen mimicker problem, because estrogen mimickers are an industrial waste, and -if Europe is any example- a waste that can be eliminated without forcing women to give up their pills. Or, we could solve the problem the WND way: got a social ill? A little cunt-blaming will solve it!

In ThePolitic.com, Shane Edwards writes, “To give this publicity would pit nature against consequence-free sex, and that just won’t happen. But what disturbs me about this even more than the environmental impact (and the reality that this will NEVER be dealt with because of its political ramifications) is what this is doing to us. I mean, if these effects are happening with fish and frogs, what is happening to us?”

Damn those sluts and their fish castrating ways. Feminism: turns your daughters to whores and your fish into girlie whore-fish. And don’t even think about what those chemical plants consumer waste products toothless, unenforced, being-dismantled EPA regulations cunty mchormonebags are doing to your balls, man. It’ll just make your estrogen-softened formerly manly self cry.

Cat and Girl

Friday, July 20th, 2007

Today’s cat and girl is especially cute ‘n’ clever.

You’ve come a long way, Ebba!

Thursday, July 19th, 2007

Congratulations to Sweden, which, according to the World Economic Forum, is the best country to live in if you’re a woman. The friend from Stockholm who showed me this Marie Claire article on MSN about it agreed that, yes, Sweden is a pretty progressive place (though the current government is doing its best to undermine said progress). But the article itself is a whopping heap of ridiculousness.

First off, this isn’t a news piece. The “new report” was released in 2005, and the article is in the MSN Lifestyle section along with such crucial stories as “Design a Handbag, Win a Trip to NYC!” and “Making lust last.” Its focus is on “it girl,” editor-in-chief of Sweden’s largest magazine for young women Ebba von Sydow. (“Everyone hates her,” my friend informs me.)

[S]he’s a firm believer that Swedish women don’t have to give up their femininity. “I love makeup, I wear pink, and I’m obsessed with handbags,” she confesses. “I’m proof that you can be both smart and womanly. I get thousands of letters from girls saying that I inspire them.”

Okay, maybe I’m being unfair here. I wear a lot of pink myself. But what’s with equating stereotypical gender characteristics with womanhood?

The article goes out of its way to feign shock at the chicks claiming to be equal human beings. From the “tall, blonde police boss” to the Sex in the City-watching Anna-Maria and her four boyfriends, the whole story has a certain “you go girl!” feel. But just in case American women get inspired by the Swedish example and become all uppity, Marie Claire takes pains to point out the downside to not being a second-class citizen:

To avoid double standards, women like Anna-Maria are fanatical about paying their fair share on dates. “I feel very uncomfortable if a man buys me dinner or drinks — as though I owe him something,” she says. Fortunately she almost never finds herself in that predicament, since Swedish men rarely offer to pay, nor do they perform any other conventional courtesies, such as holding a door open or helping a woman visibly struggling under the load of a heavy bag.

But the biggest problem for Swedish women, apparently, is shopping:

With its high income tax, women take home an average of $22,000 per year, compared with $29,000 for American women. Yet prices in Sweden are up to four times higher: a drugstore lipstick costs $15, a pair of non-designer jeans, $130. An evening out costs almost $150. For young women who like to have fun, it can be hard on the wallet. “I save all week for the weekends,” says Anna-Maria Blomberg, 27, who works as a human resources assistant for a pharmaceutical company. “When I shop, I’m always trying to find ways to buy clothes on sale, so I can spend more on accessories like shoes and bags.”

One thing the article doesn’t mention when tallying up the cost of living, though, is that the $7,000 a year more that an average American woman takes home probably gets swallowed up fairly quickly by such trivial, non-shoe-related expenses such as health care premiums, college tuition, and day care—all of which are nicely covered by Sweden’s social safety net.

Naturally, such an article wouldn’t be complete without a mention of Those Rabid FeministsTM. Even in Sweden’s utopia, those bra-burners still aren’t happy:

A new female-run political party, Feminist Initiative, was launched in 2005 on such platforms as abolishing marriage laws — thereby granting any two (or three, or four!) people cohabiting the same rights as a husband and wife — and legally requiring fathers to take as much time off for child care as mothers. While the party was initially touted as “the way for women’s future,” its support plummeted after its convention several months ago, during which members sang a rowdy song about “chopping men to bits.”

Like much in this story, Feminist Initiative (which is no longer an electoral party) has a bit more of a platform than that. Here’s their website, and from what I can see, it’s all quite good and sensible. (Note particularly: “Nearly all Swedish political parties call themselves feminist, but women’s lives remain unchanged, day in and day out, year after year.” I can’t imagine a political party in Canada, let alone America, calling itself feminist. But I digress.)

Conclusion: Being treated like a human is all very nice, but one wouldn’t want to become (tee-hee) too human. We’d have less money for handbags, and even wind up with unisex washrooms, eww.

Americans don’t need no stinking immigrants serving their frozen drinks or rescuing their children from drowning.

Thursday, July 19th, 2007

Every cloud has a silver lining. The best part about any needlessly reactionary legislative battle is waiting for the unintended consequences to pop up. Like remember when a bunch of states made vague anti-gay-marriage Constitutional amendments and now it’s harder in those states to get a DV conviction if you’re not married to the guy who’s punching you? That will always be the classic example, but now we have another example that is almost as good.

Remember that Senate immigration bill clusterfuck? The one that when we heard ‘immigrant’ we were supposed to think ‘Mexican’? The one that pleased exactly no one?

Well, it turns out that there are other countries besides Mexico, and some of the people who live in those countries would like to work in America for a short amount of time. Who knew? And we’re not talking filthy brown leprosy-spreading farmhands, here – we’re talking about the sexy young Eastern Europeans who guard your pools and ski slopes. Yes, that’s right, in our rush to prevent the bad kind of immigrant- you know, your poor huddled masses yearning to breathe free- from undercutting Americans who might want to do excruciating farm work under an unrelenting sun for sub-minimum wages, we accidentally hurt those we need the most: the young foreign adventure-seekers who keep our seasonal attractions running smoothly.

Among the casualties when the bill collapsed was the expansion of a visa program called H-2B, which allows employers to recruit 66,000 foreigners a year to fill jobs for up to six months. The bill would have lifted the cap to 100,000 and would also have made permanent an exemption that now allows in thousands more temporary workers but is set to expire on Sept. 30.

H-2B has become so popular among resort operators, race tracks, casinos, landscapers and others that this summer’s supply of visas ran out in March. Democratic Sen. Barbara Mikulski of Maryland, where the seafood industry depends on Mexican H-2B workers to pick the meat from Chesapeake Bay crabs for canning, has vowed to attach an expansion of the program to other legislation.

Ignore the bit about the crab canning, because we will not be seeing too much of those Mexicans again for the rest of the article.

Stephen Lavery, president of Virginia-based High Sierra Pools Inc., says that he hired neighborhood kids as lifeguards when he began his pool-management company 18 years ago, but that the labor source soon began to dry up. College students began taking internships that would buff their post-graduation résumés, or sought jobs they could continue during the school year. High-school students signed up for summer courses or exotic travel to build up their college applications.

…Mr. Lavery, whose company provides lifeguards and maintenance to 250 Washington-area pools, says his first H-2B hires a dozen years ago were Germans. But the dollar has weakened against the euro and Western European students have flocked to European Union countries where they don’t need visas and can earn more money.

That has forced pool operators to recruit further east each year. This year for the first time, Mr. Lavery has workers from Kazakhstan and Russia, in addition to such mainstay H-2B suppliers as Bulgaria and the Czech Republic. “I’ve heard there’s options in Thailand,” he says.

This actually does suck a lot because the H-2B seems like a great way to see America. It kind of makes me wish I’d typed “work in Europe” into Google at least once back when I had summers free:

On a recent bright Saturday, Patricia Fajtova, a 21-year-old Slovak marketing student, explained how she came to be sitting guard at an apartment-house pool in Washington using a temporary cultural-exchange visa: “I typed ‘work in the USA’ into the Google,” and up popped the Sierra Pools Web site, she said.

…All three women said they opted for jobs in the U.S. after concluding that careers and marriage will soon limit their opportunities to visit. “We have more chance to see Europe later,” said Ms. Ivosevic.

So this was kind of a win-win situation for everyone. Sure, it was kind of a pain in the ass for employeers, but they were clearly getting quality workers and young people were getting an opportunity to fund some travel and anyone who’s worked seasonal jobs at recreational facilities knows that that’s normally a blast. I’d worked in an amusement park for three summers, and I’d jump all over the chance to do that in Spain or Germany or even Japan.

Then we had to go all “gahh! Mexicans!” And while we absolutely failed to do anything useful about the Mexican ‘problem’ (whether you defined the problem as the mere presence of Mexicans in America or the way they’re exploited once they get here) we did manage to bone our ski resort managers and those nice Slovakian kids who guard the community pool. Good on us.* I guess we’ll put that in the ‘ironic victories’ pile, with all the others.

*Since this will largely inconvenience those with the means to go skiing or to resorts, I actually mean that. Somethings got to wake these people up because if we were thinking then this sort of thing wouldn’t be happening, right?

Spam warns of the coming oral and anal revolution

Thursday, July 19th, 2007

This dire warning was found in our spam catcher this morning:

adult cam shots…

Lips and Assholes Revolution…

Unfortunately, that was the entirety of the message. I can only assume the sender was assassinated before he could complete the message. The ellipses suggest that “LonBartlett54″ was already short of breath, wheezing out his last words on the keyboard.

What this means I cannot say. Do our lips and assholes want to revolt against us? Are people like LonBartlett54 revolting against their own lips and assholes? Or are they perhaps interested in conquering ours? No one can say. But perhaps it’s time for us to board up our lips and assholes so nothing can get in or out.

It may be the only way to ensure our own safety.

The Quintessential Yes or No Question of Our Time!!!

Tuesday, July 17th, 2007


Lions For Lambs TrailerThe most amazing bloopers are here

React.

To get fake revenge for 9/11, we created the likelihood of more 9/11s

Tuesday, July 17th, 2007

People say the Bush administration hasn’t learned from history, and maybe that’s true, but they’ve certainly learned from the future. Even if the date of that future is in the past. I guess what I mean to say is, “holy fuck did the Bush administration do a good job of making 1984 come alive.”

Any good Orwellian will tell you that you can’t live in permanent Big Brothery without constant war to distract and cow the populace. By scheming his way into the Iraq debacle, Bush has now officially made his lie the truth:

The [intelligence agency] findings focused most heavily on Osama bin Laden’s al-Qaida network, which was judged to remain the most serious threat to the United States. The group’s affiliate in Iraq, which has not yet posed a direct threat to U.S. soil, could do just that, the report concluded. Al-Qaida in Iraq threatened to attack the United States in a Web statement last September.

The Iraqi affiliate also helps al-Qaida more broadly as it tries to energize Sunni Muslim extremists around the globe, raise resources and recruit and indoctrinate operatives — “including for homeland attacks,” according to a declassified summary of the report’s main findings.

Interestingly, an earlier version of this AP article explicitly noted that the Iraq version of al-Qaida went from non-existent to one of the most powerful arms of terrorism and the group most intent on attacking the US. Now, the piece just indicates that they are a danger; it dropped the suggestion that we created our greatest threat by invading Iraq. I’m sure that edit was totally grammar-related, though.

Of course, for all we know, this whole report is just partisan tripe designed to provide flimsy justification for continuing the war. It’s been well-documented that agencies have been purged at all levels of all but the toadiest of cronies. But whatever “scary foreign name” we choose to give them, I have no trouble believing our bumbling conquest has generated whole swaths of people who’d give their lives to strike back at America.

So, let’s review.

We have a president who stole one election to gain power and another to keep it, all while continuing to find new ways to violate our Constitution. He also occupied a country without cause and fostered so much international instability that we’ve lost our friends and made millions of enemies who have nothing to lose. As a result, the fake enemy is now real. And in the eyes of many, the unwinnable war must now be continued because we can’t afford to lose. And the future deaths of thousands of Americans and millions of people that don’t seem entirely real to those same Americans may be assured. All we have left to do is restart the Cold War.

Oh, wait.

Pirates from a parallel universe

Tuesday, July 17th, 2007

It’s wrong that I rather envy Johann Hari for getting to go on the Cruise of Wingnuttia, isn’t it? My poor, sheltered brain would have likely exploded from all the stupid, and Hari ought to be commended on his apparent ability to keep a straight face through the entire ordeal.

Still. It sounds deeply hilarious.

Ethanol, part deux

Monday, July 16th, 2007

Some good news for people who like alternative energy: ethanol is back on the table.

Cellulosic ethanol is ethanol that comes from cellulose instead of sugar. This is good because most plants don’t have a lot of sugar, but all plants have lots of cellulose. So, instead of using food crops, (like corn and sugar cane which have lots of sugar) to create fuel, we can use any crops, like mown grass clippings, fallen tree limbs or corn stalks (instead of corn ears) to create ethanol.

I’ve been working with some cellulose derivatives this summer, and anyone will tell you that while cellulose can be an absolute bitch to work with, once you’ve hammered out the chemistry that leads to the results you want, that shit is dirt cheap and everywhere. Even better news? It doesn’t have that lameass yield that corn does:

Cellulosic ethanol can contain up to 16 times more energy than is required to create it! If that doesn’t sound ridiculously impressive, consider that gasoline contains only 5 times more energy than was required to create it and corn ethanol is totally lame, containing only 1.3 times the energy required to create it.

The world hates on my package

Monday, July 16th, 2007

I was scratching my crotch the other day (because it’s the manly thing to do when idle), and the checkout clerk freaked out on me because she said the attention I was drawing to my bulge was preventing her from doing her job.

Earlier last week, I was sitting in a movie theater with my hand halfway down my pants for comfort, and the chick sitting next to me said I needed to get it out of there because she couldn’t think about the movie with so much distraction emanating from my cock-tal region.

Sometimes when I wear boxers and khaki slacks, “snake and the boys” jangle freely. The waitress at my favorite bar said that I wasn’t allowed to leave my stool unless I taped them down because whenever I got up to pee, she spilled her tray thinking about my jewels.

Seriously. Those things totally happened.

Would I lie?

Okay, you got me. None of those things happened. If I were to scratch my crotch in public, no one would say anything. If I jammed my hand halfway down my pants while relaxing in public, folks wouldn’t notice or mind. And if I had the gall to let my junk warble around in boxers and loose pants, I wouldn’t catch a bit of flak.

But if I had boobs and dared to take them out in public? That’d be a whole different story.

The importance of language

Monday, July 16th, 2007

From Counterpunch, an interesting article on Israeli doublespeak. The pedant in me feels the need to point out that Orwell never used the term “doublespeak” in 1984. But it’s still a useful concept. Of course, neither Orwell nor the Israeli government ought to be blamed for inventing deliberately obscure political language. They simply provide, the former through cautionary fiction and essays, the latter through straight-faced political discourse, some of the most famous examples.

Take particular note of the deviously ingenious “moderate physical pressure,” because if it hasn’t yet been popularized in North America, it will be soon enough. It’s the neatest solution to the last gasps of moral conscience in the West: If 24 and ticking time bomb scenarios haven’t worn down public and legal resistance to human rights violations, one can simply redefine acts of torture as something other than torture.

Lea Tsemel, a defense lawyer and founder of the Public Committee Against Torture in Israel (PCATI) remarked, “Israel is the only Western country that openly uses torture. This is not some brute in the secret services beating up a prisoner. It’s done in the open. There is quiet legitimation by a high-ranking commission and government ministers” (New York Times, May 8, 1997).

A judgment issued this past June allows Shin Bet to use methods regarded by PCATI as torture when in a “ticking bomb” situation. With likely wide interpretation of this circumstance, it appears a green light has just been issued to reinstate the practice.

Redefinition and euphemism are endemic to any political discussion where straightforward language would reveal a serious error in thinking. The war against Afghanistan, for example, is never called a war (at least not here, where the idea of a “War on Terror” makes most right-thinking people cringe). It’s a “mission.” We don’t attack houses, schools, markets, and mosques; “they” use “human shields.”

I’m not sure if the rise in such language, particularly in journalism, is real or imagined; it certainly seems more widespread than it used to be (Stalinist Russia excepted, because I love the term “posthumous rehabilitation”). Once you start noticing these catchphrases, you can’t stop, and then you start to wonder whether their popularity is caused by collusion or simply sloppy thinking. Either way, they should be pointed out and held up for scrutiny as often as possible. When someone uses them, that person’s trying to slip something by the public that they wouldn’t otherwise stand for.

Dear VIAMREC:

Sunday, July 15th, 2007

I got your eight novel-length comments. Get some damn help. Also, to the best of my knowledge there are no fluent Spanish speakers moderating the comments so I’m not going to let the novellas through because I have no idea what you’re saying. Plus, if it’s more of this:

If you think to rape a women better kill first, if you thing to hit a women even by self defence or if you have the point.

The women in police and laboratories put the rape and the female victims in first and so dedicated as a homicide or terrorism, so better kill and kill women where there are many specially feminist as a terrorist act, why be executed just for a murder if you going to be the same by thousand, so
Better go to the infra-structures of feminist organizations specially dress as a women whit powerful bombs in your bag and a gun whit a silenciator, kill the politicians feminist whit bombs in there cars or another’s alternatives.

Then that shit ain’t getting through even if I could read it. You’re one rant away from a real ban, which would be my first. Congrats.