<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What&#8217;s lucky for Edwards should be lucky for Bush, right?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://punkassblog.com/2007/03/27/snow-cancer-couric-edwards/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://punkassblog.com/2007/03/27/snow-cancer-couric-edwards/</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: JoeC</title>
		<link>http://punkassblog.com/2007/03/27/snow-cancer-couric-edwards/#comment-38248</link>
		<dc:creator>JoeC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 15:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punkassblog.com/2007/03/27/snow-cancer-couric-edwards/#comment-38248</guid>
		<description>I want a Katie interview with Tony Snow! No fluffy cotton-candy interview this time...I want her to ask Tony the tough questions, and maybe Bush could sit in and offer his insight, too (he can even bring Cheney along if he must). 

Katie will undoubtedly ask whether Bush is going to attend Tony's funeral, and if he thinks that will be distracting, like his non-presence at 3,200 other funerals is designed not to be distracting. She's got the good questions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I want a Katie interview with Tony Snow! No fluffy cotton-candy interview this time&#8230;I want her to ask Tony the tough questions, and maybe Bush could sit in and offer his insight, too (he can even bring Cheney along if he must). </p>
<p>Katie will undoubtedly ask whether Bush is going to attend Tony&#8217;s funeral, and if he thinks that will be distracting, like his non-presence at 3,200 other funerals is designed not to be distracting. She&#8217;s got the good questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gender Blank</title>
		<link>http://punkassblog.com/2007/03/27/snow-cancer-couric-edwards/#comment-38247</link>
		<dc:creator>Gender Blank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 14:57:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punkassblog.com/2007/03/27/snow-cancer-couric-edwards/#comment-38247</guid>
		<description>Thank you for this post.  I was just saying last night that while I don't wish cancer on anyone, the timing of this couldn't have been better.  The righties will now have to lay off Edwards or get risk getting socked with their own hypocritical Snow balls.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for this post.  I was just saying last night that while I don&#8217;t wish cancer on anyone, the timing of this couldn&#8217;t have been better.  The righties will now have to lay off Edwards or get risk getting socked with their own hypocritical Snow balls.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: firefalluk</title>
		<link>http://punkassblog.com/2007/03/27/snow-cancer-couric-edwards/#comment-38245</link>
		<dc:creator>firefalluk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 14:25:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punkassblog.com/2007/03/27/snow-cancer-couric-edwards/#comment-38245</guid>
		<description>seems reasonable to me.

I don't get the preposterous hypocrisy that results from these announcements, annointing known liars, preposterous PR flacks and other known evildoers as saintly or good, just because their deaths have suddenly become imminent. It doesn't, usually, omprove their character or judgement.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>seems reasonable to me.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t get the preposterous hypocrisy that results from these announcements, annointing known liars, preposterous PR flacks and other known evildoers as saintly or good, just because their deaths have suddenly become imminent. It doesn&#8217;t, usually, omprove their character or judgement.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
