Comments on: Wake up, America! Pelosi’s uterus has you hypnotized!

By: Terry C, Pelosi Fan

Terry C, Pelosi Fan — Sat, 03 Feb 2007 01:57:11 +0000

You sexist prick.

What is it about independent, intelligent, capable women that scares you right wing losers?

By: Metro

Metro — Fri, 19 Jan 2007 23:21:00 +0000

Y’know, I thought about going to see that screed in the original, but I doubt it would be as funny.

Am I too late to the party to comment that when it comes to manipulating kids for political advantage, the GOP has the corner?

In fact, they have the whole block. As in blocking stem-cell research, the single presidential veto event.

Happy delurking and all that.

By: Progressive Gold » Blog Archive » 116870126315108093

Progressive Gold » Blog Archive » 116870126315108093 — Tue, 16 Jan 2007 21:10:22 +0000

[...] Via Punkass marc: It must be difficult to be a famous woman. If you don’t have children, you’re an old maid with shriveled ovaries who has forsaken your godly purpose. If you have children and don’t talk about them, you’re a cold parent who puts her career ahead of her offspring. If you’re like Nancy Pelosi, i.e. you have children and talk about them openly, you’re holding your previously occupied uterus above the heads of jealous menfolk as a sign of your superiority. [...]

By: The Adventures of Tobasco da Gama

The Adventures of Tobasco da Gama — Mon, 15 Jan 2007 23:44:15 +0000

A Brief Callback…

This post on PunkAssBlog (by way of Pharyngula) touches on a phenomenon I noted way back in my first ever blog post. A week ago.
Is the spite directed at Speaker Pelosi really just an expression of femiphobia? Or just mainly? It certainly doesn’t…

By: Milo Johnson

Milo Johnson — Sun, 14 Jan 2007 18:06:44 +0000

Shapiro has balls?

By: The American Street » Blog Archive » Sugar and spice and everything nice, too

Sun, 14 Jan 2007 16:28:49 +0000

[...] I couldn’t resist. Shakespeare’s Sister has a satirical post on the female reproductive tract as a source of gay rays, and evolgen chimes in, noting the similarity of her diagram to the nematode vulva (it’s true—if mammalian vulvas are radiating gayness, nematodes are even more common; Ben Shapiro is probably crawling with hermaphroditic nematodes, all oozing sexual ambiguity all over him). So I had to repost my summary of the evolution of the mammalian vagina, and I want you to look at the diagram of Hox gene expression in the female reproductive tract. It’s like a rainbow! Admittedly, there are no disco balls, pink triangles, or floating Melissa Etheridge CDs, but this is research that has only just begun—as we get more details, we’ll have to sprinkle more symbols in there, and I think Shake’s ideas are excellent suggestions. [...]

By: Pharyngula

Pharyngula — Sun, 14 Jan 2007 16:26:44 +0000

Sugar and spice and everything nice, too…

I couldn’t resist. Shakespeare’s Sister has a satirical post on the female reproductive tract as a source of gay rays, and evolgen chimes in, noting the similarity of her diagram to the nematode vulva (it’s true—if mammalian vulvas are……

By: Dick Tuck

Dick Tuck — Sat, 13 Jan 2007 17:00:58 +0000

What a mysogonist, anti-family values rant. What women isn’t proud of family and grandchildren. Maybe your mother?

By: LA Confidential Pantload

LA Confidential Pantload — Sat, 13 Jan 2007 14:19:56 +0000

So the Chief Justice was making a political prostate-ment by bringing his kids to his swearing-in ceremony? And what’s with this “working prostate” shit? Doesn’t anybody care about all the unemployed prostates out there?

By: Leap blogging at Bene Diction Blogs On

Leap blogging at Bene Diction Blogs On — Sat, 13 Jan 2007 13:10:50 +0000

[...] This is a fisking! [...]