Raw Story has printed a letter sent to Congress from thousands of US scientists and experts.

In it, our scientific community expresses unconditional recognition of the real dangers of global warming, the impact it’s already had on our planet, and the urgent need for government action to reduce our fossil fuel consumption. Though the EPA has left our planet for dead, at least a huge number of American scientists are trying to do something about it.

My one complaint about the letter is that it occasionally uses the term “climate change,” which is a Republican frame that attempts to make global warming seem more like a pleasant seasonal alteration and less like a potential devastator of modern society.

But that’s a minor issue, and probably one that feeds into their plan. As we all know, whenever the right wants to distract us from their failings, they manufacture absurd definitional arguments. In Iraq, we’re debating over whether the violence constitutes “civil war.” By refusing to acknowledge that it does, Republicans have moved the debate away from the war and the bloodshed (plus the fact that it’s all their fault) and into the realm of semantics. The same thing is true for reproductive freedom. We spend loads of time arguing over whether a zygote is a person or not, but it really doesn’t matter.

Whatever they choose to call it, any time a conservative pulls the “we can’t be sure” card when it comes to global warming, or whenever one chooses to play semantic games about the environment and what warming “really means for the planet,” we should simply refer them to something like this letter. The unanimity from environmental experts is further proof that the debate is over.


4 Responses to “10,000 US scientists/experts call for EPA to step up on global warming”  

  1. 1 Andrew

    I tend to use the phrase climate change for a couple of reasons:
    1) Too many idiots keep saying it doesn’t feel any warmer, therefore no problem.
    2) Not everywhere on the globe will necessarily get warmer. The doomsday scenario that always gets my attention is the one in which thermohaline circulation is disrupted, and Northern Europe ends up with an Arctic climate.

  2. 2 MikeEss

    Isn’t science cool?…

    No matter how many reasonable, experienced, highly educated professionals talk about the existance of global warming, the Reichwing will still dig up some nimrod who took a chem class in high school to claim global warming doesn’t exist.

    And a bunch of redneck Limbaugh listeners (who think GWB was appointed by god) will still believe the nimrod…

  3. 3 (punkass) Marc Faletti

    Andrew,

    But it’s the melting of the ice caps that pose some of the biggest dangers, and I think “climate change” fails to capture that. Again, it sounds too pleasant. If you wanted to call it “climate collapse” or something, that might sound the right alarm bells. Or perhaps “climate transmogrification.” ;)

  4. 4 Andrew

    I like “catastrophic climate change” actually. I think I’ve probably heard it on the news.

Leave a Reply


Check Spelling
Activate Spell Check while Typing


Bad Behavior has blocked 6622 access attempts in the last 7 days.