Comments on: The Ultimate Epistemological Question http://punkassblog.com/2006/10/17/the-ultimate-epistemological-question/ Fri, 21 Nov 2008 12:29:03 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3 By: junk science http://punkassblog.com/2006/10/17/the-ultimate-epistemological-question/#comment-11763 junk science Mon, 23 Oct 2006 13:12:31 +0000 http://punkassblog.com/2006/10/17/the-ultimate-epistemological-question/#comment-11763 This title is way too big for this post. No wonder it's suddenly full of eggheads. This title is way too big for this post. No wonder it’s suddenly full of eggheads.

]]> By: Andrew http://punkassblog.com/2006/10/17/the-ultimate-epistemological-question/#comment-11748 Andrew Mon, 23 Oct 2006 08:17:48 +0000 http://punkassblog.com/2006/10/17/the-ultimate-epistemological-question/#comment-11748 I'm going to be sorry I asked, but how do you derive that? I’m going to be sorry I asked, but how do you derive that?

]]> By: JackGoff http://punkassblog.com/2006/10/17/the-ultimate-epistemological-question/#comment-11716 JackGoff Mon, 23 Oct 2006 02:52:59 +0000 http://punkassblog.com/2006/10/17/the-ultimate-epistemological-question/#comment-11716 Um...[goes crosseyed]...well, back to the Shrödinger Equation derivation and solution...[goes cross-eyed again]...FUCK!!!!!!! Um…[goes crosseyed]…well, back to the Shrödinger Equation derivation and solution…[goes cross-eyed again]…FUCK!!!!!!!

]]> By: Kyso Kisaen http://punkassblog.com/2006/10/17/the-ultimate-epistemological-question/#comment-11713 Kyso Kisaen Mon, 23 Oct 2006 02:09:43 +0000 http://punkassblog.com/2006/10/17/the-ultimate-epistemological-question/#comment-11713 That's a lot of big words for a comment in a brangelina thread, jpe mcSmartypants That’s a lot of big words for a comment in a brangelina thread, jpe mcSmartypants

]]> By: jpe http://punkassblog.com/2006/10/17/the-ultimate-epistemological-question/#comment-11709 jpe Mon, 23 Oct 2006 00:18:40 +0000 http://punkassblog.com/2006/10/17/the-ultimate-epistemological-question/#comment-11709 Wow. <i>So</i> the wrong post. Wow. So the wrong post.

]]> By: jpe http://punkassblog.com/2006/10/17/the-ultimate-epistemological-question/#comment-11708 jpe Mon, 23 Oct 2006 00:17:57 +0000 http://punkassblog.com/2006/10/17/the-ultimate-epistemological-question/#comment-11708 This is similar to the problem sex positive feminists have with exploitative gender standards: women, seemingly (false consciousness accounting for the "seemingly") freely indulge in activities in which they're obviously exploited. How do we reconcile the shitty patriarchal attitudes evinced in their freely chosen conduct? In this case, I have no problem with using social pressure to bring an end to the equally shitty patriarchal values that find their expression in the wearing of veils. Ban 'em already. This is similar to the problem sex positive feminists have with exploitative gender standards: women, seemingly (false consciousness accounting for the “seemingly”) freely indulge in activities in which they’re obviously exploited. How do we reconcile the shitty patriarchal attitudes evinced in their freely chosen conduct?

In this case, I have no problem with using social pressure to bring an end to the equally shitty patriarchal values that find their expression in the wearing of veils.

Ban ‘em already.

]]> By: Marked Hoosier http://punkassblog.com/2006/10/17/the-ultimate-epistemological-question/#comment-11316 Marked Hoosier Tue, 17 Oct 2006 10:33:07 +0000 http://punkassblog.com/2006/10/17/the-ultimate-epistemological-question/#comment-11316 But, who will win the Stanley Cup this year??? But, who will win the Stanley Cup this year???

]]> By: Andrew http://punkassblog.com/2006/10/17/the-ultimate-epistemological-question/#comment-11314 Andrew Tue, 17 Oct 2006 09:15:26 +0000 http://punkassblog.com/2006/10/17/the-ultimate-epistemological-question/#comment-11314 I hope you haven't done it again. I hope you haven’t done it again.

]]>