Guess what? The NYT lied about the 9/11 commission report, Lewinsky, and the miniseries
Published by punkass marc September 7th, 2006Are you shocked? I bet you’re shocked. And I _know_ you’re shocked that I’m pissed at the NYT.
From Think Progress:
From the New York Times review of Path to 9/11:
The Sept. 11 commission concluded that the sex scandal distracted the Clinton administration from the terrorist threat.
What the 9/11 Commission actually says (pg. 118):
Everyone involved in the decision had, of course, been aware of President Clinton’s problems. He told them to ignore them. Berger recalled the President saying to him “that they are going to get crap either way, so they should do the right thing.” All his aides testified to us that they based their advice solely on national security considerations. We have found no reason to question their statements.
This is what happens when people learn about the 9/11 Commission by watching Path to 9/11.
[h/t C&L]
Zombie-reader, zombie-reader!! I thought the NYT was dead to you?
It is a bit sad to see the old Grey Lady become the Ancient Tart, tho
Now that Bill Clinton has signed onto the protests, there’s a good chance things will change.
I love this concept that getting a blowjob at a high stress job is going to distract you from huge issues, but taking more vacation in 5 years than any other president has in 8, catering to corporate interests constantly, and only leaving vacation time to sign bills to keep dead women on life support is totally not a distration of any kind. Nope, Bush is focused on Bin Laden, sure ’nuff. Wait…what was that George? You’re NOT actually focused on Bin Laden? Don’t think about him much anymore?