PunkAssBlog.com

Damn, it’s too easy to snark on the bad HTML and layout of this, what? third tier? fourth? Pissant at any rate, rightie blog that has decided to attack Amanda. I mean, everything seems to be indented, and his use of tabs are ridiculous and gratuitous to say the least

Personally, there is one reason and one reason only to read a right wing blog, and that’s the pathetic tough man posturing that is a neccesary part of the Wingnut psyche (it’s funnier with the “ladies” though, because they’re not supposed to be all into the voyeuristic bloodlust thang), because guess what folks? It seems that those wingnuts who aren’t on the Post-Millenial Dispensationalist Gravy Train support Isreal’s expantionist agression because, dum dum DUM, they have teeny tiny cocks and Iraq’s not the stiffy producer it once was.

Shorter Goys who wave around the anti-semitic card:

“Sure we’re using the term anti-semitic to hide the fact that we really get turned on by the idea of arabs being blown up, because we really are that racist, but that’s only becasue liberals are the real racists for objecting to it!”

Seriously, we have a self-identified Catholic, going on and on about how liberals are, I shit you not, “anti-jesus” because apparently we don’t approve of Isreal blowing up random innocent civilians in Lebanon. Oh, I’m sorry, we’re anti-jesus, anti-semites aren’t we?

Does God kill a kitten everytime we masturbate? Are we making the little baby jesus cry? Is The internet, actually, a series of tubes? Any other tired old cliche you want to whip out at us? Do all your base belong to us?

And let’s get back to this guy being a catholic.

So he’s a catholic right? So guess what words he uses to describe the unjustified mass reprisals against lebanese cities by the IDF in response to the capturing of IDF military personnel by Hezbollah? Guess.

The leftist blogosphere has been avidly hyping Zionist conspiracy theories, begun a widespread political gangbang of Joe Liberman, has always complained about the US’s support of Israel, and now doesn’t support what is a relatively clear moral right to crack a few skulls in the current conflict.

Let’s ignore the out right slander, which I think is a reference to left wigners using the term Zionist to actually describe the self-referential group of Isrealis who consider themselves “Zionists”, and the whole icky “gangbang of joe liebermann” mental image, let’s focus instead on the term “relatively clear moral right”.

A Catholic is saying that it’s morally right for Isreal to blow up large sections of a highly populated metropolis.

Umm…The fuck!?

So let me get this straight? This:

Is bad, but This:

Is okay?

Killing innocent people is okay, while masturbation or using a condom, which kills billions of spermies, is morally wrong and a sin?

And then there’s the projection.

Think about it: If you’re not for handing out free abortion coupons in high schools, you’re anti-woman. Not for an increase in well-fare, you’re anti-black. If you’re not totally for immigration, you’re anti-Mexican. If you say that “All terrorists are Muslims” (with neat parody to “All racists are Republicans”), you’re an anti-Mulsim bigot. If you eat meat, you probably rape women. Hell, Marcotte will practically use the “if you don’t agree with us, you’re a bigot” logic on people of her own ilk. You don’t think the Duke Lacrosse guys are guilty as sin? You’re a rape apologist. We hear this shit time and time again, it never ends.

Yes, this WATB really is trying to stomp his teeny weeny little foot at the thought of a ginormous strawman throwing a binary world view back at him.

These are the wingers who are saying that if you don’t totally support Isreal in everything it does you’re an anti-semite, in this very post no less, here’s the relevent quote:

Marcotte flipped out a rather good post about how she doesn’t like being called an anti-semite because she isn’t supporting Israel in the current conflict.

And why is that such a difficult logical conclusion to draw? The leftist blogosphere has been avidly hyping Zionist conspiracy theories, begun a widespread political gangbang of Joe Liberman, has always complained about the US’s support of Israel, and now doesn’t support what is a relatively clear moral right to crack a few skulls in the current conflict. Why is it, such a stretch to consider that maybe Marcotte is anti-Semitic? She certainly has her beefs with Jeff over at Protein Wisdom.

None of which makes any sense unless objecting to Isreal bombing lebanon is the same thing as anti-semitism. or you consider objections to Liebermann’s general assbaggery as anti-semitic or think that disagreeing with a man who’s too stupid to string a coherent sentence together with out having to tweezer out his eensy-weensy dick and threat to slap someone with it (which I imagine would be akin to being slapped by a single strand of leg hair - unnoticable). All of which happen to be incredibly specious and inherently idiotic claims that even small children can usually grasp without too much trouble. And it’s these ridiculous leaps of logic that you want to hang the anti-semitic hat on?

So hating jews, anti-semitism, that’s what objecting to the pointless slaughter of innocent lives is equal to, hating jews. Because… err… Joe Liebermann and jeff Goldstein are Jewish? Do you even know what the word “anti-semitism” means fool?

Can you say “Uncle Leo“? Sure, I knew you could. Are the Neturei Karta anti-semitic? How about other anti-zionist jews who have solid theological reasons for objecting to the state of isreal anti-semites?

Of but of course they, that’s the great Irony, the real Anti-Semites are slinging the term about like it means something, when it’s mainly there to obfuscate the fact that these anti-semites really think that all jews are zionists, that all jews approve of the lebanese bombings, let alone the ghetooization of the palestinians in the west bank and gaza strip

And let’s examine how he objects to the idea that if you call all muslims terrorist, you’re a racist.

Newsflash! If you call all Jews colonialists, imperialists and racists, or all black people stupid, you’re a racist assbag! So why on earth do you think it’d be different when you call all billion or so muslims in the world terrorists? Including little babies and infirm old people? You really think there is any sort of leeway that might allow you to use the concept of all muslims in the world beign terrorists without people thinking you’re a racist assbag? I’m sorry if your little morally relative winger brain can grasp thsi concept but I’ll spell it out to you straight: Racism IS Racist, that may seem really obvious to most the PAB readers but this guy seems not to have quite grasped the concept, instead preffering a world view in which whatever he and his side do is morally okay, and everything on the other side is morally wrong.

It’s stupid ass concepts like that which make me think that Kant and every moralist before or after him were total morons for trying to codify morality at all, as soon as you lay it down on paper, you lay it down for reinterpretation, so all those neat little bibilical values the right-wing is always gibbering about suddenly get turned into a moral free for all, where every nutcase sociopath and psycho starts reworking and reassessing the various and often conflicting concepts so that they’ll better be able to jsutify their own petty wants and dreams

And seriously, “abortion coupons”? What, like book coupons? abort twins, get triplets free? What the fuck is this WATB blubbering about? Of course the only reason why the strawmen are such obvious, binary creatures is because that’s the closest the wingnut brain ever comes to sophistication, seriously, this probably classes as subtle to these fruit loops.

*sigh*, this means I’ve got to unpack my clue-by-four doesn’t it? Goddammit…