<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Return of Elder George: Patriarchy will turn that frown up-side-down!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://punkassblog.com/2006/07/25/the-return-of-elder-george-patriarchy-will-turn-that-frown-up-side-down/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://punkassblog.com/2006/07/25/the-return-of-elder-george-patriarchy-will-turn-that-frown-up-side-down/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 04:59:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sara</title>
		<link>http://punkassblog.com/2006/07/25/the-return-of-elder-george-patriarchy-will-turn-that-frown-up-side-down/comment-page-1/#comment-4808</link>
		<dc:creator>Sara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2006 01:41:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punkassblog.com/2006/07/25/the-return-of-elder-george-patriarchy-will-turn-that-frown-up-side-down/#comment-4808</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m lost at the massive, massive leap from &quot;extended families are Good Things&quot; to &quot;and by the by, only patriarchal, polygynous environments produce extended families.&quot;

This is just my personal experiental data here, but on my (Filipina) mum&#039;s side of the family I&#039;ve got three aunts, three uncles, seven cousins, and a grandfather (grandmother&#039;s recently deceased). Extended family to the MAX -- and plenty more to boot who still live overseas. I&#039;ve got literally &lt;i&gt;hundred&lt;/i&gt; of other relatives whom I&#039;ve never even met. But it sure as hell didn&#039;t take a &quot;patriarchal, polygynous environment&quot; to produce &lt;i&gt;this&lt;/i&gt; particular extended family.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m lost at the massive, massive leap from &#8220;extended families are Good Things&#8221; to &#8220;and by the by, only patriarchal, polygynous environments produce extended families.&#8221;</p>
<p>This is just my personal experiental data here, but on my (Filipina) mum&#8217;s side of the family I&#8217;ve got three aunts, three uncles, seven cousins, and a grandfather (grandmother&#8217;s recently deceased). Extended family to the MAX &#8212; and plenty more to boot who still live overseas. I&#8217;ve got literally <i>hundred</i> of other relatives whom I&#8217;ve never even met. But it sure as hell didn&#8217;t take a &#8220;patriarchal, polygynous environment&#8221; to produce <i>this</i> particular extended family.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: binky</title>
		<link>http://punkassblog.com/2006/07/25/the-return-of-elder-george-patriarchy-will-turn-that-frown-up-side-down/comment-page-1/#comment-4801</link>
		<dc:creator>binky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 18:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punkassblog.com/2006/07/25/the-return-of-elder-george-patriarchy-will-turn-that-frown-up-side-down/#comment-4801</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;If we realize the &lt;b&gt;cause&lt;/b&gt; then the solution becomes obvious&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Repeat after me: correlation does not equal causation, correlation does not equal causation.

Not that he&#039;s actually shown a lot of real evidence for correlation either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If we realize the <b>cause</b> then the solution becomes obvious</p></blockquote>
<p>Repeat after me: correlation does not equal causation, correlation does not equal causation.</p>
<p>Not that he&#8217;s actually shown a lot of real evidence for correlation either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: floyd</title>
		<link>http://punkassblog.com/2006/07/25/the-return-of-elder-george-patriarchy-will-turn-that-frown-up-side-down/comment-page-1/#comment-4800</link>
		<dc:creator>floyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 16:59:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punkassblog.com/2006/07/25/the-return-of-elder-george-patriarchy-will-turn-that-frown-up-side-down/#comment-4800</guid>
		<description>Am I correct in guessing that Elder George is a Mormon?  (Please - I don&#039;t have the stomach to visit that site). I&#039;m basing this on the name, and the pro-polygyny stance.  (Aside - this is a pet peeve of mine - when someone says &quot;polygamy&quot; when they really mean one male with many female spouses, which is polygyny.  Polygamy also includes polyandry (one female, multiple males), but I doubt Elder George includes that in his vision of a perfectly patriachal world.)

Continuing on - I wonder how George would explain this &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1505997,00.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;fun little by-product of polygamy?&lt;/a&gt;.  If God* really wanted all men to have multiple wives, why do humans naturally reproduce a population split of around 50/50?  Oh right - &#039;cause he WANTED you to abandon the little boys and marry the little girls.  

What can turn you from a cruel, cold-hearted pedophile into a Righteous Man?  The Patriarchy! While supplies last!

*I&#039;m not saying that God has anything to do with this.  I&#039;m just saying that religious advocates of polygyny need to take some remedial math classes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I correct in guessing that Elder George is a Mormon?  (Please &#8211; I don&#8217;t have the stomach to visit that site). I&#8217;m basing this on the name, and the pro-polygyny stance.  (Aside &#8211; this is a pet peeve of mine &#8211; when someone says &#8220;polygamy&#8221; when they really mean one male with many female spouses, which is polygyny.  Polygamy also includes polyandry (one female, multiple males), but I doubt Elder George includes that in his vision of a perfectly patriachal world.)</p>
<p>Continuing on &#8211; I wonder how George would explain this <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/usa/story/0,12271,1505997,00.html" rel="nofollow">fun little by-product of polygamy?</a>.  If God* really wanted all men to have multiple wives, why do humans naturally reproduce a population split of around 50/50?  Oh right &#8211; &#8217;cause he WANTED you to abandon the little boys and marry the little girls.  </p>
<p>What can turn you from a cruel, cold-hearted pedophile into a Righteous Man?  The Patriarchy! While supplies last!</p>
<p>*I&#8217;m not saying that God has anything to do with this.  I&#8217;m just saying that religious advocates of polygyny need to take some remedial math classes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SarahS</title>
		<link>http://punkassblog.com/2006/07/25/the-return-of-elder-george-patriarchy-will-turn-that-frown-up-side-down/comment-page-1/#comment-4791</link>
		<dc:creator>SarahS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 12:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punkassblog.com/2006/07/25/the-return-of-elder-george-patriarchy-will-turn-that-frown-up-side-down/#comment-4791</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m baffled.  Is this guy really saying that the only way for men to live is to make women miserable?  That when women are happy, men (who are supposed to be the strong ones right) can&#039;t just see a therapist and spank their inner moppet?  Instead they have to collect women like action figures and force them to do all their housework?  

This is some fucked up shit right there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m baffled.  Is this guy really saying that the only way for men to live is to make women miserable?  That when women are happy, men (who are supposed to be the strong ones right) can&#8217;t just see a therapist and spank their inner moppet?  Instead they have to collect women like action figures and force them to do all their housework?  </p>
<p>This is some fucked up shit right there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: junk science</title>
		<link>http://punkassblog.com/2006/07/25/the-return-of-elder-george-patriarchy-will-turn-that-frown-up-side-down/comment-page-1/#comment-4789</link>
		<dc:creator>junk science</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 11:24:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punkassblog.com/2006/07/25/the-return-of-elder-george-patriarchy-will-turn-that-frown-up-side-down/#comment-4789</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;But .. wont that result in massive immigration from these countries? Aren’t they against immigration?&lt;/i&gt;

Unlike American women, these men understand that love requires sacrifice.

&lt;i&gt;Something Will Have To Be Done&lt;/i&gt;

Hey, you&#039;re right. I wonder if it would be too much to expect them to move to &quot;Asia or South America&quot; themselves to avoid having to bring their mail-order brides back to the poisoned watering hole. Of course, then they&#039;d have to deal with in-laws.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>But .. wont that result in massive immigration from these countries? Aren’t they against immigration?</i></p>
<p>Unlike American women, these men understand that love requires sacrifice.</p>
<p><i>Something Will Have To Be Done</i></p>
<p>Hey, you&#8217;re right. I wonder if it would be too much to expect them to move to &#8220;Asia or South America&#8221; themselves to avoid having to bring their mail-order brides back to the poisoned watering hole. Of course, then they&#8217;d have to deal with in-laws.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: firefalluk</title>
		<link>http://punkassblog.com/2006/07/25/the-return-of-elder-george-patriarchy-will-turn-that-frown-up-side-down/comment-page-1/#comment-4785</link>
		<dc:creator>firefalluk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 10:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punkassblog.com/2006/07/25/the-return-of-elder-george-patriarchy-will-turn-that-frown-up-side-down/#comment-4785</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;If we realize the cause then the solution becomes obvious in that we should open up every man’s range of choices outside of the traditional domestic domain. For some this may mean looking towards Asia or South America while for many others like myself that path lead to the beautiful and traditional women of Russia and the FSU.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
But .. wont that result in &lt;i&gt;massive&lt;/i&gt; immigration from these countries? Aren&#039;t they against immigration? or is it only brown people that aren&#039;t welcome?

Of course, after a few years in the US &amp; being in contact with radical american women, these slavewifes will rebel and demand divorce too, so obviously Something Will Have To Be Done</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>If we realize the cause then the solution becomes obvious in that we should open up every man’s range of choices outside of the traditional domestic domain. For some this may mean looking towards Asia or South America while for many others like myself that path lead to the beautiful and traditional women of Russia and the FSU.</p></blockquote>
<p>But .. wont that result in <i>massive</i> immigration from these countries? Aren&#8217;t they against immigration? or is it only brown people that aren&#8217;t welcome?</p>
<p>Of course, after a few years in the US &amp; being in contact with radical american women, these slavewifes will rebel and demand divorce too, so obviously Something Will Have To Be Done</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Djur</title>
		<link>http://punkassblog.com/2006/07/25/the-return-of-elder-george-patriarchy-will-turn-that-frown-up-side-down/comment-page-1/#comment-4769</link>
		<dc:creator>Djur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 06:10:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punkassblog.com/2006/07/25/the-return-of-elder-george-patriarchy-will-turn-that-frown-up-side-down/#comment-4769</guid>
		<description>I also thought it was Bush Sr. for a second.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also thought it was Bush Sr. for a second.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: belledame222</title>
		<link>http://punkassblog.com/2006/07/25/the-return-of-elder-george-patriarchy-will-turn-that-frown-up-side-down/comment-page-1/#comment-4752</link>
		<dc:creator>belledame222</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 04:33:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punkassblog.com/2006/07/25/the-return-of-elder-george-patriarchy-will-turn-that-frown-up-side-down/#comment-4752</guid>
		<description>&gt;There are many things that women don’t do that men do because they are not men. Of course this is a deep concept to a society that does not understand gender differences&gt;

&quot;They eat of the beef, and enjoy to look at the bosoms.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&gt;There are many things that women don’t do that men do because they are not men. Of course this is a deep concept to a society that does not understand gender differences&gt;</p>
<p>&#8220;They eat of the beef, and enjoy to look at the bosoms.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: belledame222</title>
		<link>http://punkassblog.com/2006/07/25/the-return-of-elder-george-patriarchy-will-turn-that-frown-up-side-down/comment-page-1/#comment-4751</link>
		<dc:creator>belledame222</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 04:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punkassblog.com/2006/07/25/the-return-of-elder-george-patriarchy-will-turn-that-frown-up-side-down/#comment-4751</guid>
		<description>...wow.

Y&#039;know, when I first saw &quot;Elder George&quot; I thought you must mean GBush Sr.  wondering why he was choosing to speak about depression of all things; but also thinking: &quot;Huh.  That would explain a lot.&quot;

so.  guy&#039;s really called &quot;Elder George,&quot; huh.

and, well, that article, and, the publication, that it&#039;s in.  

well.

huh.  

wow.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;wow.</p>
<p>Y&#8217;know, when I first saw &#8220;Elder George&#8221; I thought you must mean GBush Sr.  wondering why he was choosing to speak about depression of all things; but also thinking: &#8220;Huh.  That would explain a lot.&#8221;</p>
<p>so.  guy&#8217;s really called &#8220;Elder George,&#8221; huh.</p>
<p>and, well, that article, and, the publication, that it&#8217;s in.  </p>
<p>well.</p>
<p>huh.  </p>
<p>wow.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: junk science</title>
		<link>http://punkassblog.com/2006/07/25/the-return-of-elder-george-patriarchy-will-turn-that-frown-up-side-down/comment-page-1/#comment-4744</link>
		<dc:creator>junk science</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 03:27:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://punkassblog.com/2006/07/25/the-return-of-elder-george-patriarchy-will-turn-that-frown-up-side-down/#comment-4744</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;However because that desire is turned against us, to pursue them romantically would likely spell our own demise.&lt;/i&gt;

They&#039;ve got &lt;i&gt;teeth&lt;/i&gt; down there now, you know that? Big, shiny, white teeth where teeth should &lt;i&gt;just not be&lt;/i&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>However because that desire is turned against us, to pursue them romantically would likely spell our own demise.</i></p>
<p>They&#8217;ve got <i>teeth</i> down there now, you know that? Big, shiny, white teeth where teeth should <i>just not be</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

