Comments on: Chemistry-it’s not just for scientists anymore! http://punkassblog.com/2006/05/07/chemistry-its-not-just-for-scientists-anymore/ Sun, 20 Nov 2011 04:59:27 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3 By: Auguste http://punkassblog.com/2006/05/07/chemistry-its-not-just-for-scientists-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-396 Auguste Tue, 09 May 2006 00:57:34 +0000 http://punkassblog.com/2006/05/07/chemistry-its-not-just-for-scientists-anymore/#comment-396 For those of you who hate WMP, <a href="http://youtube.com/watch?v=RKbLk3QfK04&search=you got served robot chicken" rel="nofollow">this works better</a>. For those of you who hate WMP, this works better.

]]> By: Auguste http://punkassblog.com/2006/05/07/chemistry-its-not-just-for-scientists-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-390 Auguste Mon, 08 May 2006 23:52:37 +0000 http://punkassblog.com/2006/05/07/chemistry-its-not-just-for-scientists-anymore/#comment-390 I didn't just get served, I got <a href="http://media.putfile.com/voltron20" rel="nofollow">ROBO-SERVED</a>. I didn’t just get served, I got ROBO-SERVED.

]]> By: punkass marc http://punkassblog.com/2006/05/07/chemistry-its-not-just-for-scientists-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-388 punkass marc Mon, 08 May 2006 22:33:09 +0000 http://punkassblog.com/2006/05/07/chemistry-its-not-just-for-scientists-anymore/#comment-388 Daaaamn. Auguste got s3rv3d. Daaaamn. Auguste got s3rv3d.

]]> By: Chris Clarke http://punkassblog.com/2006/05/07/chemistry-its-not-just-for-scientists-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-387 Chris Clarke Mon, 08 May 2006 22:23:31 +0000 http://punkassblog.com/2006/05/07/chemistry-its-not-just-for-scientists-anymore/#comment-387 <blockquote>Do you like to have sex with 30-year-old married guys with glasses and a so-five-years-ago-goatee? Yes |X| No | |</blockquote> That is just heinous and wrong. It should be Do you like to have sex with 46-year-old married guys with back hair and a so-thirty-five-years-ago-beard? Yes | | Hell Yes | |

Do you like to have sex with 30-year-old married guys with glasses and a so-five-years-ago-goatee?

Yes |X| No | |

That is just heinous and wrong.

It should be

Do you like to have sex with 46-year-old married guys with back hair and a so-thirty-five-years-ago-beard?

Yes | | Hell Yes | |

]]> By: Auguste http://punkassblog.com/2006/05/07/chemistry-its-not-just-for-scientists-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-385 Auguste Mon, 08 May 2006 19:54:03 +0000 http://punkassblog.com/2006/05/07/chemistry-its-not-just-for-scientists-anymore/#comment-385 If I ran a dating site, the compatibility test would have only one question: Do you like to have sex with 30-year-old married guys with glasses and a so-five-years-ago-goatee? Yes |X| No | | If I ran a dating site, the compatibility test would have only one question:

Do you like to have sex with 30-year-old married guys with glasses and a so-five-years-ago-goatee?

Yes |X| No | |

]]> By: MissPrism http://punkassblog.com/2006/05/07/chemistry-its-not-just-for-scientists-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-379 MissPrism Mon, 08 May 2006 18:29:38 +0000 http://punkassblog.com/2006/05/07/chemistry-its-not-just-for-scientists-anymore/#comment-379 There's probably a fortune to be made from a dating agency with DNA test included, guaranteeing you a partner with different MHC genotype. It probably wouldn't make a blind bit of dfference, so you could throw all the samples away and save the expense of actually doing the test. There’s probably a fortune to be made from a dating agency with DNA test included, guaranteeing you a partner with different MHC genotype.

It probably wouldn’t make a blind bit of dfference, so you could throw all the samples away and save the expense of actually doing the test.

]]> By: Caja http://punkassblog.com/2006/05/07/chemistry-its-not-just-for-scientists-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-377 Caja Mon, 08 May 2006 17:03:45 +0000 http://punkassblog.com/2006/05/07/chemistry-its-not-just-for-scientists-anymore/#comment-377 Actually, if you're really looking for something like that, okcupid.com _does_ combine personality "tests" and sliding bar graph thingies with the usual demographic data. It's an incredible time-waster, cause there are literally hundreds of user-created tests and quizzes and crap. But it's fun. Actually, if you’re really looking for something like that, okcupid.com _does_ combine personality “tests” and sliding bar graph thingies with the usual demographic data. It’s an incredible time-waster, cause there are literally hundreds of user-created tests and quizzes and crap. But it’s fun.

]]> By: Tammy http://punkassblog.com/2006/05/07/chemistry-its-not-just-for-scientists-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-368 Tammy Mon, 08 May 2006 13:59:36 +0000 http://punkassblog.com/2006/05/07/chemistry-its-not-just-for-scientists-anymore/#comment-368 What would be cool is if they had a way to test your pheremone levels to see if you'd be hot for each other. What would be cool is if they had a way to test your pheremone levels to see if you’d be hot for each other.

]]> By: McBoing http://punkassblog.com/2006/05/07/chemistry-its-not-just-for-scientists-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-360 McBoing Mon, 08 May 2006 03:55:00 +0000 http://punkassblog.com/2006/05/07/chemistry-its-not-just-for-scientists-anymore/#comment-360 Christ, what a letdown. Christ, what a letdown.

]]> By: Neil the Ethical Werewolf http://punkassblog.com/2006/05/07/chemistry-its-not-just-for-scientists-anymore/comment-page-1/#comment-358 Neil the Ethical Werewolf Mon, 08 May 2006 02:40:37 +0000 http://punkassblog.com/2006/05/07/chemistry-its-not-just-for-scientists-anymore/#comment-358 When I saw those hexagons, I thought it was a six-carbon phenyl ring. Sadly, chemistry.com seems to be low on chemistry. When I saw those hexagons, I thought it was a six-carbon phenyl ring. Sadly, chemistry.com seems to be low on chemistry.

]]>